Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
RESEARCH PAPER
Enhancing the Achievement in Physics’ Motion Concept through Online Multiple Intelligence Learning Approach
1
Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA
2
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, MALAYSIA
Publication date: 2021-02-13
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(2):em1941
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The complexity of physics concepts in online learning environment probably will only benefit
certain group of students. Thus, there are suggestions that the approach of delivering physics
concepts in online learning environment shoud be conducted in various ways. The purposed of
research was to investigate the effect of online multiple intelligence-based learning on
achievement in physics’ motion concept among 10th grade students. The one group pre-test and
post-test design were used in this research with purposive sampling, with 30 students in a science
junior high school in Malaysia. In the research, the data were obtained from Multiple Intelligence
Test and Physics Force and Motion Concept Test, which were analyzed using one-way ANOVA
and non-parametric test Wilcoxon and Friedman. The findings reveal that online multiple
intelligence-based learning had an effect on the achievement in physics’ force and motion
concepts with mathematical logic and Intrapersonal intelligence group performed significantly
better than others.
REFERENCES (49)
1.
Abdul Rahim, K., & Selamat, S. R. (2014). Penerapan Teori Kecerdasan Pelbagai dalam Pengajaran Jenis-Jenis Ayat [Application of Multiple Intelligences Theory in the Teaching of Sentence Types]. Seminar Bahasa Melayu 2014.
2.
Ainley, M. (2012). Students’ Interest and Engagement in Classroom Activities. In Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
3.
Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 32-44.
4.
Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies, and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Retrieved from http://www.ictliteracy.info/rf....
5.
Armstrong, T. (2000). In their own way: Discovering and encouraging your child’s multiple intelligences (rev. and updated ed.). New York, NY: Penguin Putnam.
6.
Bachtold M. (2013). What Do Students “Construct” According to Constructivism in Science Education? Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2477-2496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
7.
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2008). Research in Education (10th Ed.). India: Prentice Hall.
8.
Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2007). Reinventing project-based learning: Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
9.
Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 16-32.
10.
Cambell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research. Chicago: Rand Menally.
11.
Chien, C.-F., Chen, G. Y.-H., & Liao, C.-J. (2019). Designing a Connectivist Flipped Classroom Platform Using Unified Modelling Language. Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD....
12.
Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2005). What Do Pupils Think of Open Science Investigations? A Study of Singaporean Primary 6 Pupils. Educational Research. 47(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318....
13.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/030572....
14.
Choi, I., Lee, S. J., & Jung, J. W. (2008) Designing Multimedia Case-Based Instruction Accommodating students’ Diverse Learning Style. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 5-25.
15.
Chung, K. C. (2008). Antecedent of Brand Trust in Online Tertiary Education: A Malaysian and Singapore Perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(4), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v....
16.
Cohen, L., Manion. L., & Morrison, K. (2001). Research Methods in Education (5th Ed.). New York: Routledge Falmer.
17.
Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation; A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678-707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9....
18.
Elkins, J. (2007). Learning disabilities: Bringing fields and nations together. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 392-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221....
19.
Erinosho, S. Y. (2013). How Do Students Perceive the Difficulty of Physics in Secondary School? An Exploratory Study in Nigeria. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), Special Issue Volume 3 Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.20533/IJCDS....
21.
Gen, R. (2000). Technology and multiple intelligences. ED at a Distance, 15(5), 4-9.
22.
George, G., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
Gray, K. C., & Xiaoli, C. (2001). Computer and internet usage in education: Theories, practice, and research basics. Journal Educational Technology System, 29(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.2190/87H6-R....
24.
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009a). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 14(4), 1130-1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083....
25.
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009b). Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age: Web 2.0 and Classroom Research--What Path Should We Take “Now”? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
26.
Hair, J. F. H., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th Ed.). Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
27.
Halpern, D. F. (2002). Cognitive Science and the Work of Reform. In J. L. Narum & K. Conover (Eds.), Building Robust Learning Environment in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and Procedures Assessing Science Process Skill. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/096959....
29.
Howell, A. J., & Buro, K. (2009). Implicit beliefs, achievement goals, and procrastination: a mediational analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 151-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lind....
30.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316....
31.
Mantyla, T., & Koponen, I. T. (2007). Understanding the Role of Measurements in Creating Physical Quantities: A Case Study of Learning to Quantify Temperature in Physics Teacher Education. Science& Education, 16(3), 291-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
32.
Ministry Education of Malaysia (MOE) (2012). Spesifikasi Kurikulum Fizik Tingkatan Empat [Fourth Level Physical Curriculum Specifications]. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum KPM. Kuala Lumpur.
33.
Murphy, K. L., & Cifuentes, L. (2001). Using web tools, collaborating, and learning online. Distance Education, 22(2), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/015879....
34.
Neset, D. (2005). The effect of web-based homework on university students’ physics achievements. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 156-161.
35.
Ng’ambi, D., & Lombe, A. (2012). Using Podcasting to Facilitate Student Learning: A Constructivist Perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 181-192.
36.
Nik Daud, N. S., Abd Karim, M. M., Wan Hassan, S. W., & Rahman, N. (2015). Misconception and Difficulties in Introductory Physics Among High School and University Students: An Overview in Mechanics (34 - 47). EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology (EJSMT), 2(1), 34-47.
37.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lesson from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
38.
Piew, C. Y. (2013). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan [Basic Research Statistics: Second Edition] (2nd Ed.). McGraw Hill.
39.
Pulit anak Lai (1998). Mengkaji Strategi Pengajaran Fizik di Sekolah: Satu Kajian Kes di beberapa Sekolah Daerah Kajang, Selangor [Studying Physics Teaching Strategies in Schools: A Case Study in Several Kajang District Schools, Selangor] (Unpublished Thesis). Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
40.
Ramlah, J., & Mahani, R. (2002). Psikologi Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kontemporari [Educational Psychology: A Contemporary Approach]. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
41.
Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
42.
Rhodes, L. K., & Bellamy, T. (1999). Choices and consequences in the reform of teacher education. Journal or Teacher Education, 50, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248....
43.
Sandra, R., Abu Bakar, N., & Norlidah. A, (2013). Penggunaan ICT merentas kurikulum standard prasekolah kebangsaan (kspk): tinjauan di prasekolah kementerian pelajaran Malaysia [Use of ICT across the national preschool standard curriculum (kspk): survey in preschools ministry of education Malaysia]. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(4), 65.
44.
Shy-Jong, J. (2007). A Study of Students’ Construction of Science Knowledge: Talk and Writing in a Collaborative Group. Educational Research, 49(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318....
45.
Sidman-Taveau, R. & Milner-Bolotin, M. (2001). Constructivist inspiration: A project-based model for L2 learning in virtual worlds. Texas Papers in Foreign Language, 6(1), 63-82.
46.
Trif, L. (2015). Training models of social constructivism: Teaching based on developing a scaffold. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences: The 6th International Conference Edu World, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp....
47.
Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Student’ characteristics, self regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/015879....
48.
Wang, Y. D. (2014). Building student trust in online learning environment. Distance Education, 35(3), 345- 359. https://doi.org/10.1080/015879....
49.
Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, E. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
