RESEARCH PAPER
Investigating students’ arguments with real-life functional situations throughout a sequence of collaborative activities
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Haifa, Haifa, ISRAEL
 
2
Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, AUSTRALIA
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-10-16
 
 
Publication date: 2024-11-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(11):em2526
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Recent years have seen increasing interest in providing students with opportunities for developing important argumentation skills in the mathematics classroom. Social interactions with peers to critique alternative ideas, justify arguments, and build consensus, have been found to promote deep thinking and meaningful development of concepts. In this study we explored 9th -grade students’ interactions during a sequence of specifically designed argumentation tasks on real-life functional situations to investigate the appropriateness of their arguments. Data were collected from the students’ written task responses, student reflections, small-group observations, individual interviews with the group members, and teacher interviews. Analysis of the level of appropriateness of the students’ individual and group written responses in each activity focused on three aspects: identifying variables, forming relations between them, and noticing contextual features of the real-life situation. We found evidence of students grappling with selecting two suitable variables and with conceptualizing the nature of their relation. It also appeared that aspects of the students’ social interactions played a role in students ignoring correct arguments and accepting incorrect arguments. We discuss implications for small-group argumentation and suggest avenues for future research.
 
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Andriessen, J. E. B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentative design. In N. Muller-Mirza, & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education–Theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 145-174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-....
 
2.
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/004615....
 
3.
Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2016). Factors shaping students' opportunities to engage in argumentative activity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics education, 14(3), 575-601.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
4.
Ayalon, M., Watson, A., & Lerman, S. (2016a). Progression towards functions: Students' performance on three tasks about variables from grades 7 to 12. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14(6), 1153-1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
5.
Ayalon, M., Watson, A., & Lerman, S. (2016b). Reasoning about variables in 11 to 18 year olds: Informal, schooled and formal expression in learning about functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28, 379-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394....
 
6.
Ayalon, M., Watson, A., & Lerman, S. (2018). Comparison of students’ understanding of functions in classes following English and Israeli national curricula. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
7.
Ayalon, M., Wilkie, K. J., & Eid, K. H. (2021). Relating students’ emotions during argumentative discourse to their learning of real-life functional situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110, 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
8.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585-614. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144....
 
9.
Burkhardt, H., & Swan, M. (2012). Designing assessment of performance in mathematics. Educational Designer, 2(5), 1-40.
 
10.
Cavagnetto, A. R., & Kurtz, K. J. (2016). Promoting students’ attention to argumentative reasoning patterns. Science Education, 100(4), 625-644. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
 
11.
CCSSI. 2010. Common core state standards for mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/t....
 
12.
Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students’ justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0127....
 
13.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20....
 
14.
Chua, B. I., (2016). Justification in Singapore secondary mathematics. In P. C. Toh, & B. Kaur (Eds.), Developing 21st century competencies in the mathematics classroom (pp. 165-188). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/978981....
 
15.
Clement, J. (1985). Misconceptions in graphing. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 369-375). Utrecht University.
 
16.
Corrbet, D., & Wilson, B. (1995). Make a difference with, not for, student. Educational Researcher, 24, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
17.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE.
 
18.
Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326....
 
19.
Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
 
20.
Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2009). Deliberation versus dispute: The impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom. Informal Logic, 29(4), 417-446. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v2....
 
21.
Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 361-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
22.
Goldenberg, E. P. (1987). Believing is seeing: How preconceptions influence the perceptions of graphs. In J. Bergeron, N. Herscovits, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 197-203).
 
23.
Goldenberg, E. P., & Kliman, M. (1988). Metaphors for understanding graphs: What you see is what you see. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED3033....
 
24.
Janvier, C. (1981). Use of situations in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(1), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0038....
 
25.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., &Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran, & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3-27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
 
26.
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1-64. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465....
 
27.
Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Ablex.
 
28.
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students’ use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. In M. Lovett, & P. Shah (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
 
29.
McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
 
30.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
 
31.
Ministry of Education. (2020). The adult character skills document. https://meyda.education.gov.il....
 
32.
Ministry of Education. (2024). The new mathematics curriculum for middle-high school. https://pop.education.gov.il/t....
 
33.
Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2014). Teachers promoting student mathematical reasoning. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/247274....
 
34.
Reuter, F. (2023). Explorative mathematical argumentation: A theoretical framework for identifying and analysing argumentation processes in early mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112, 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
35.
Schultz, K., Clement, J., & Mokros, J. (1986). Adolescents’ graphing skills: A descriptive analysis [Paper presentation]. The Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
 
36.
Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M. J. (2017). Dialogue: Argumentation and education: History, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/978131....
 
37.
Slavit, D. (1997). An alternate route to the reification of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(3), 259-281. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002....
 
38.
Staples, M. (2014). Supporting student justification in middle school mathematics classrooms: Teachers’ work to create a context for justification. CRME Publications. 4. https://digitalcommons.lib.uco....
 
39.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2-3), 229-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0127....
 
40.
Toh, P. C., & Kaur, B. (Eds.). (2016). Developing 21st century competencies in the mathematics classroom. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/10132.
 
41.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
 
42.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
 
43.
Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A., & Lee, H. S. (2008). Learning opportunities from group discussions: Warrants become the objects of debate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
44.
Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children’s mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222-255.
 
45.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresem....
 
46.
Zambak, V. S., & Magiera, M. T. (2020). Supporting grades 1-8 pre-service teachers’ argumentation skills: Constructing mathematical arguments in situations that facilitate analyzing cases. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(8), 1196-1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top