1/2018 vol. 14
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
RESEARCH PAPER
A Case Study on Developmental Changes of Eleventh Graders’ Scientific Inquiry Competences
Yu-Liang (Aldy) Chang 1
,
 
Su-Chiao (Angel) Wu 2
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Graduate Institute of Educational Administration and Policy Development, National Chiayi University, TAIWAN
 
2
Department of Early Childhood Education, National Chiayi University, TAIWAN
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-11-07
 
 
Publication date: 2017-11-07
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(1):363-382
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79838
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (73)
 
KEYWORDS
scientific competence
scientific inquiry competence
vocational high school
inquiry-based teaching and learning
 
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to explore possible developmental changes of vocational high school students’ scientific inquiry competence while they learned within the “Mechatronics” inquiry-based curriculum and instruction. A case study approach was employed in this study, while multiple resources of 77 11th graders’ learning were collected and analyzed by using the editing analytic techniques. During the process of this two-year study, there were 11 changes of students’ competence extracted from the data collected. These changes were inducted into 6 categories of scientific inquiry competences and then finally formed three themes, “basic competence, advanced competence, and critical competence”. The result of this study was reported as a developmental triad of students’ scientific inquiry competences. Based on discussions, as teachers, we have to actively implement the real-life problem-solving teaching practice to enhance students’ scientific inquiry competences. The findings of this study also provided the insight that how teachers understood the scope and sequence in designing inquiry-based curricula. Finally, the dialogue between the findings and the literature reminded us that students’ scientific inquiry competences could not be cultivated in a short time; instead, a long-term and context-driven curriculum design is the cornerstone to develop their competences for future learning and life.
 
REFERENCES (73)
1.
American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1989). Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics and technology. Washington, DC: AAAS.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Ann, C. H. K. & Marcy, S-G. (2010). Inscriptional practices in undergraduate introductory science courses: A path toward improving prospective k-6 teachers understanding and teaching of science. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(3), 58-88.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Atilhan, M., Eljack, F., Atilhan, H. M., Froyd, J. E., El-Halwagi, M., & Mahalec, V. (2014). Inquiry guided learning in a chemical engineering core curriculum general instructional approach and specific application to the fluid mechanics case. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(6), 1450-1460.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Barak, M. & Shakhman, L. (2008). Reform-based science teaching: Teachers‟ instructional practices and conceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 11-20.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Barbro, G. & Johan O. (2013). DEQUAL: A tool of investigating deliberative qualities in students’ socio-scientific conversations. International Journal of Environment & Science Education, 8(2), 319-338.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Brown, W. R. (1977). The effect of process-skill instruction on performance of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Research Teaching, 14(1), 83-87.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Bruner, J. S. (1967). The Process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. E. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. In D. L. Gabel (ED.), Handbook of Research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357-388). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5e instructional model: Origins and effectiveness, Colorado Springs, CO: A Report Prepared for the Office of Science Education, National Institutes of Health.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Bybee, R. W., Powell, J. C., and Trowbridge, L. W. (2008). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Cajas, F. (1999). Public understanding of science: Using technology to enhance school science in everyday life. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 765-773.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Chin, C. C. (2007). A reflection on the science education of Taiwan: The voice from the elites in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 627-646.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Chang, L. Y. (2008). A study on science inquiry for gifted students. Bulletin of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 18, 51-71.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Chang, Y. L. (2015). Using mechatronics curriculum design in enhancing vocational high-school students’ competence of scientific inquiry. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(5), 1398-1409.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Chang, Y. L., & Wu, H. H. (2015). A case study of increasing vocational high school teachers practices in designing interdisciplinary use of scientific inquiry in curriculum design. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 11(1), 37-51.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Center for Science Mathematics and Engineering Education [CSMEE] (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Using codes and code manuals: A template organizing style of interpretation. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research in primary care: Multiple strategies (2nd ed., pp. 163-177). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Cross, R. T. (1999). The public understanding of science: Implication for education. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 699-702.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1999). The responsibility of science and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 775-785.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Colburn, A., & Bianchini, J. K. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teacher: A tale of researchers. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 37(2), 177-209.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Durant, J. R. (1993). What is scientific literacy? In J. R. Durant, & J. Gregory (Eds.), Science and culture in Europe (pp. 129-137). London: Science Museum.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Durant, J. R., Evans, G. A., & Thomas, G. P. (1989). The public understanding of science, Nature, 340(6), 11-14.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Espinosa-Bueno, J. S., Labastida-Pina, D. V., Padilla-Martínez, K., & Garritz A. (2011). Pedagogical content knowledge of inquiry: An instrument to assess it and its application to high school in-service science teachers. US-China Education Review, 8(5), 599-614.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, T. R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643-658.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Gallagher, J., & Harsch, G. (1997). Scientific literacy: Science education and secondary school students. In W. Graeber & C. Bolte. (Eds.). Scientific literacy: An international symposium (pp. 13-34). Kiel, Germany: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften [IPN].
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Gejda, L. M., & LaRocco, D. J. (2006, October). Inquiry-based instruction in secondary science classrooms: A survey of teacher practice. Research paper presented at the 37th annual Northeast Educational Research Association Conference, Kerhonkson, NY.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Hazen, R. M. (2002). Why should you be scientifically literate? Retrieved on Oct. 15, 2012 from Action Bioscience website at http://www.actionbioscience.or....
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362.
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Hsu, Y. (2006). A survey of college students’ scientific competence: An example of Kainan University. Journal of the Chinese for General Education, 9, 137-154.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Jacobs-Sera, D., Hatfull, G.F., and Hanauer, D.I. (2009). Assessing scientific inquiry. In Hanauer, I.D., Hatfull, G.F., & Jacobs-Sera, D. (Eds.), Active assessment: Assessing scientific inquiry (pp. 31-43). New York: Springer.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Keeves, J., & Aikenhead, G. (1995). Science curriculum in changing world. In B, J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Improving science education (pp. 13-45). Chicago, IL: The National Society for the Study of Education, University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Ketelhut, D.J., Dede, C., & Clarke, J. (2010). A multi-user virtual environment for building higher order inquiry skills in science. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 56-68.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Klein, P. D. (2006). The challenges of science literacy: From the viewpoint of second-generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2/3), 143-178.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Kulgemeyer, C., & Schecker, H. (2014). Research on educational standards in German science education: Towards a model of student competences. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(4), 257-269.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Lee, W.-C., & Chang, C.-Y. (2005). Taiwan’s secondary school teachers’ expectations with regard to the earth science literacy of their students. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Mathematics & Science Education, 50(2), 1-27.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Lin, C. Y. (1995). The development and validation of the understanding of the nature of science scale. Science Education Monthly, 4(1), 1-58.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Lin, S. S. (1999). Reflection on scientific literacy. Science Education Monthly, 222, 16-25.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Lubben, F., & Millar, R. (1996). Children’s ideas about the reliability of experimental data. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 955-968.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Lunsford, E., & Melear, C.T. (2004). Using scoring rubrics to evaluate inquiry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(1), 34-38.
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier. R., & Tal, R. T. (2004). Inquiry‐based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063-1080.
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Ministry of Education, Taiwan (2000). Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Ministry of Education, Taiwan (2007). Science Education Whitepaper. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Ministry of Education, Taiwan (2014). 12-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Moore, R. W., & Sutman, F. X. (1970). The development, field test, and validation of an inventory of scientific attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 85-94.
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
National Center for Education Statistics [NCES] (2012). The condition of education 2012. Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2014 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/co....
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
National Science Teacher Association [NSTA] (2004). Scientific inquiry. Retrieved on Oct. 20, 2014 from http://www.nsta.org/about/posi....
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
National Research Council [NRC] (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
53.
National Research Council [NRC] (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
54.
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
55.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240.
Google Scholar
 
 
56.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2007). Assessing scientific, and mathematical literacy. Paris: Author.
Google Scholar
 
 
57.
Orgill, M., & Thomas, M. (2007). Analogies and the 5E model: Suggestions for using analogies in each phase of the 5E model. The science teacher, 74, 40-45.
Google Scholar
 
 
58.
Pella, M. O. (1967). Scientific Literacy and the High School Curriculum. School Science & Mathematics, 67, 346-356.
Google Scholar
 
 
59.
Rithchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 799-815.
Google Scholar
 
 
60.
Roth, W. M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry laboratories. Dordrecht: The Netherlands: Kluwen Academic Publishing.
Google Scholar
 
 
61.
Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). A holistic model of competence. In D. S. Rychen and L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. (pp. 41-62). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber Publisher.
Google Scholar
 
 
62.
Santos-Trigo, M. (2008). An inquiry approach to construct instructional trajectories based on the use of digital technologies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(4), 347-357.
Google Scholar
 
 
63.
Shavelson, R. (2010). On the measurement of competency. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2, 43-65.
Google Scholar
 
 
64.
Shen, B. S. P. (1975). Science Literacy: The Public Need. The Sciences, 1, 27-29.
Google Scholar
 
 
65.
Showalter, V. (1974). What is unified science education? Program objectives and scientific literacy, 2, 1-6.
Google Scholar
 
 
66.
Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
Google Scholar
 
 
67.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk.
Google Scholar
 
 
68.
Wenning, C. (2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Education Online, 4(2), 21-24.
Google Scholar
 
 
69.
Yen, C. F., & Huang, S. C. (1999). Student interactions in open-inquiry ecological research settings. Science Education Monthly, 11(2), 141-169.
Google Scholar
 
 
70.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
 
 
71.
Zachos, P. (2004). Pendulum phenomena and the assessment of scientific inquiry capabilities. Science and Education, 13(7-8), 743-756.
Google Scholar
 
 
72.
Zachos, P., Hick, T. L., Doanne, W. E., & Sargent, C. (2000). Setting theoretical and empirical foundations for assessing scientific inquiry and discovery in educational programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 938-962.
Google Scholar
 
 
73.
Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., & Lee, H. W. (2009). Flipping the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition. Retrieved on Nov. 15, 2014 from https://peer.asee.org/flipping....
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Preservice Chemistry Teachers’ Epistemic Beliefs After a Student-Centred Approach Training Programme
A Case Study of Increasing Vocational High School Teachers Practices in Designing Interdisciplinary Use of Scientific Inquiry in Curriculum Design
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top