Creative Drama In Science education: The Effects on Situational Interest, Career Interest, and Science-Related Attitudes of Science Majors and Non-Science Majors
More details
Hide details
Tunghai University, TAIWAN
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, MALAYSIA
Online publication date: 2020-01-15
Publication date: 2020-01-15
Corresponding author
Kiah-Ju Ong   

Tunghai University, TAIWAN
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2020;16(4):em1831
This research investigated the effects of creative drama on situational interest, career interest, and science-related attitudes of science majors and non-science majors. Also investigated were students’ perception toward creative drama.

Material and methods:
55 science majors and 28 non-science majors from five high schools in Malaysia voluntarily participated in this 5-day creative drama activity held in Taiwan. They completed pre-tests on “The Individual Interest Questionnaire” and “Test of Science-Related Attitudes”. They designed, prepared, and presented their creative drama during the 5-day. A post-test was administered after the activity.

Creative drama was found to have triggered the situational interest in science within both majors. The career interest and science-related attitudes of science majors were found to have significant improvement; some students’ perception toward science careers and science have changed after the activity. Some students commented that creative drama had developed their courage, social skills, teamwork, creativity, self-reflection, presentation skills, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills.

Due to the promising results, hence, creative drama in science education could be an alternative to promote interest and career interest in science, science-related attitudes, and the development of soft skills.

Academy of Science Malaysia. (2018). Science outlook 2017. Kuala Lumpur, Academy of Sciences Malaysia.
Adiguzel, H. Ö., & Timucin, E. (2010). The effect of creative drama on student achievement in the instruction of some development and learning theories. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1741-1746.
Ainley, M., & Hidi, S. (2014). Interest and enjoyment. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (eds), The International Handbook of Emotions in Education (pp. 205-227). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545-561.
Allina, B. (2017). The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 77-87.
Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3-15.
Andersen, C. (2004). Learning in “as-if” worlds: Cognition in drama in education. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 281-286.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617-639.
Arieli, B. (2007). The integration of creative drama into science teaching. Ph.D. dissertation, Kansas State University, United States-Kansas. From dissertations & theses: A & l. (Publication No. AAT 3291364).
Arveklev, S. H., Berg, L., Wigert, H., Morrison-Helme, M., & Lepp, M. (2018). Nursing students experiences of learning about nursing through drama. Nurse Education in Practice, 28, 60-65.
Ashton-Hay, S. (2005). Drama: Engaging all learning styles. Paper presented in Proceedings 9th International INGED (Turkish English Education Association) Conference, Economics and Technical University, Ankara Turkey, 20-22 October 2005. Retrieved from
Azevedo, F. S. (2013). The tailored practice of hobbies and its implication for the design of interest-based learning environments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 462-510.
Batdi, V., & Batdi, H. (2015). Effect of creative drama on academic achievement: A meta-analytic and thematic analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6), 1459-1470.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.<740::aid-sce4>;2-3.
Bong, M., Lee S. K., & Woo, Y. K. (2015). The role of interest and self-efficacy in pursuing mathematics and science. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds), Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning (pp. 33-48). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Cakici, Y., & Bayir, E. (2012). Developing children’s views of the nature of science through role play. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7), 1075-1091.
Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 243-257.
Ceylan, E., Polat, R. K., Akpınar, M., Ulusal, E., & Kalender, S. (2015). Designing science instruction based on creative drama: The effect on 6th grade students’ understanding and elimination of misconceptions. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(4), 1-10.
Choi, Y., Yang, J., H. & Hong, SH. (2016). The effects of smart media based STEAM program of ‘Chicken Life Cycle’ on academic achievement, scientific process skills and affective domain of elementary school students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(2), 166-180.
Çokadar, H., & Yılmaz, G. C. (2010). Teaching ecosystems and matter cycles with creative drama activities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), 80-89.
Colucci-Gray, L., Burnard, P., Cooke, C., Davies, R., Gray, D. S., & Trowsdale, J. (2017). BERA Research Commission Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: how can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education? British Educational Research Association. Retrieved from
Crouch, C. H., Wisittanawat, P., & Renninger, K. A. (2013). Initial interest, goals, and changes in CLASS scores in introductory physics for life sciences. In P. Engelhardt (ed.), Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference (pp. 105-108). Melville, NY: AIP.
DeBacker, T., & Nelson, R. (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 245-254.
Deloitte Access Economics. (2014). Australia’s STEM workforce: A survey of employers. Office of the Chief Scientist, Australian Government.
Dogru, M., Yilmaz, T. T., Kalay, A., & Gençosman, T. (2010). Effect of creative drama method in science and technology course on the attitudes of primary school fifth grade students towards the course and on their achievements. Practice and Theory in Systems of Education, 5(2), 133-144.
Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 597-610.
Fabrigar, L. R., Petty, R. E., Smith, S. M., & Crites, S. L. (2006). Understanding knowledge effects on attitude-behavior consistency: The role of relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 556-577.
Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of Science-Related Attitudes: Handbook. Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
French, D. P., & Russell, C. P. (2001). A statistical examination of student achievement and attitude in a large enrolment inquiry-based, introductory, biology course. Paper presented at the 2001 Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. St. Louis, Missouri.
Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science. Studies in Science Education, 2(1), 1-41.
Glasson, G. (1993). Reinterpreting the learning cycle from a social constructivist perspective: A qualitative study of teachers’ beliefs and practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 187-207.
Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176.
Gul, E., & Gucum, E. B. (2015). Creative drama applications as complementary for constructivist approaches for science courses: Teacher and student’s evaluations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2043-2050.
Hardiman, M., Magsamen, S., McKhann, G., & Eilber, J. (2009). Neuroeducation: Learning, arts, and the brain. New York, NY: Dana Press.
Hendrix, R. C. (2011). Using creative dramatics to foster conceptual learning in a science enrichment program (Ph.D. dissertation), Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
Hendrix, R., Eick, C., & Shannon, D. (2012). The integration of creative drama in an inquiry-based elementary program: The effect on student attitude and conceptual learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 823-846.
Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2012). To choose or not to choose science: Constructions of desirable identities among young people considering a STEM higher education programme. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 186-215.
Hung, C.M., Hwang, G. J., & Huang, I. (2012). A project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students’ learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 368-379.
Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). The relationships between primary teachers’ attitudes and cognition during a two year science in-service programme. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. D. Jong, & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education, (pp. 157-168). Netherland, Springer.
Katz, Y. J. (2002). Attitudes affecting college students’ preferences for distance learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 2-9.
Kim, E., Kim, S., Nam, D., & Lee, T. (2012). Development of STEAM program Math centered for middle school students. Retrieved from
Kim, S., Jiang, Y., & Song, J. (2015). The effect of interest and utility on Mathematics engagement and achievement. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, and S. Hidi (eds), Interest in Mathematics and science learning (pp. 63-78). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Kivunja, C. (2015). Exploring the pedagogical meaning and implications of the 4Cs “Super Skills” for the 21st century through Bruner’s 5E lenses of knowledge construction to improve pedagogies of the new learning paradigm. Creative Education, 6(2), 224-239.
Kong, Y. T, Huh, S. C., & Hwang, H. J. (2014). The effect of theme-based STEAM activity programs on self-efficacy, scientific attitude, and interest in scientific learning. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 17(10), 5153-5159.
Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23-40.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lehtonen, A., Kaasinen, M., Karjalainen-Väkevä, M., & Toivanen, T. (2016). Promoting creativity in teaching drama. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 558-566.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122.
Liao, C., Motter, J. L., & Patton, R. M. (2016). Tech-savvy girls: Learning 21st-century skills through STEAM digital artmaking. Art Education, 69(4), 29-35.
Low, K. S. D., Yoon, M., Roberts, B. W., & Rounds, J. (2005). The stability of vocational interests from early adolescence to middle adulthood: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 713-737.
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669-685.
McCaslin, N. (2006). Creative drama in the classroom and beyond (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Mji, A., & Makgato, M. (2006). Factors associated with high school learners’ poor performance: a spotlight on mathematics and physical science. South African Journal of Education, 26(2), 253-266.
Naithram, R. (2014). How music education powers the STEAM movement. neaToday. Retrieved from
Nye, C. D., Su, R., Rounds, J., & Drasgow, F. (2012). Vocational interests and performance: A quantitative summary of over 60 years of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 384-403.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
Özbek, G. (2014). Drama in education: Key conceptual features. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies / Sodobna Pedagogika, 65(1), 46-61.
Ozdemir, P., & Ustundag, T. (2007). Creative education program related to famous scientists in the field of science and technology. Primary Education Online Magazine, 226-233.
Ozek, M. B. (2016). The effect of creative drama on student achievement in the course of information technologies. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(6), 51-57.
Peter, M. (2003). Drama, narrative an early learning. British Journal of Special Education, 30 (1), 21-27.
Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218.
Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373-404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Rotgans, J. I. (2015). Validation study of a general subject-matter interest measure: The Individual Interest Questionnaire (IIQ). Health Professions Education, 1(1), 67-75.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58-67.
Rounds, J., & Su, R. (2014). The nature and power of interests. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 98-103.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88(4), 535-547.
Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10(3), 175-186.
Schmidt, K. M., & Kelter, P. (2017). Science fairs: A qualitative study of their impact on student science inquiry learning and attitudes toward STEM. Science Educator, 25(2), 126-132.
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Switzerland, World Economic Forum.
Şengun, Y., & Iskenderoglua, T. (2010). A review of creative drama studies in math education: aim, data collection, data analyses, sample and conclusions of studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1214-1219.
Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2002). Performance goals: The moderating roles of context and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 603-610.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411-417.
Silvia, P. (2008). Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity. Cognition & Emotion, 22(1), 94-113.
Sousa, D. A., & Pilecki, T. (2013). From STEAM to STEAM: Using brain-compatible strategies to integrate the arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Su, R. (2012). The power of vocational interests and interest congruence in predicting career success (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Sun, H., Chen, A., Ennis, C., Martin, R., & Shen, B. (2008). An examination of the multidimensionality of situational interest in elementary school physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(1), 62-70.
Sungurtekin, Ş., Sezer, G. O., Kahraman, P. B., & Sadioğlu, Ö. (2009). The views of pre-service teachers about creative drama: A study according to gender. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 755-770.
Swackjamer, L. E., Koellner, K., Basile, C. & Kimbrough D. (2009). Increasing the self-efficacy of inservice teachers through content knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 63-78.
Taskin-Can, B. (2013). The effects of using creative drama in science education on students’ achievements and scientific process skills. Elementary Education Online, 12(1), 120-131.
Taylor, P. C. (2016, August). Why is a STEAM curriculum perspective crucial to the 21st century? In ACER Research Conferences 2016. Retrieved from
Timothy, J., & Apata F. S. (2014). Effects of creative drama - based instruction on basic science achievement and scientific attitudes in Lagos State. ATBU, Journal of Science, Technology & Education (JOSTE), 2(2), 59-65.
Trowsdale, J. (2015). Psycho-physical theatre practice as embodied learning for young people with learning disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(10), 1022–1036.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387-398.
Wienk, M. (2017). Some students are enrolled in more than one mathematics subjects. Discipline Profile of the Mathematical Sciences 2017, AMSI (University of Melbourne), Melbourne.
Yager, R. E. (1996). History of Science/Technology/Society as reform in the United States. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Science/Technology/Society as a reform in science education (pp. 3-15). New York: State University of New York.