Development of Scoring Rubrics to Assess Physics Practical Skills
More details
Hide details
Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA
Online publication date: 2019-01-21
Publication date: 2019-01-21
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2019;15(4):em1691
The Malaysian curriculum for physics aims to produce active learners who are good with physics concepts, practical skills and scientific attitudes. Practical skills are acquired through active involvement in investigative work in the laboratory. This paper discusses the development of a scoring rubric that can be used to assess students’ physics practical skills through observation, where scores are assigned to students while they are carrying out practical work. The important physics practical skills are identified through literature review and criteria of scoring each skill are depicted. A total of twenty skills are outlined in the scoring rubric. These skills were subjected to review by a panel of expert teachers. Evidences for validity of test content were gathered. The instrument was tested on 153 Form 4 students and the data obtained was subjected to PLS-SEM analysis. Interpretation of results indicates satisfactory validity and reliability. Results on the scoring rubrics is found to have weak but significant correlation with a written practical test subjected to the same group of students.
Abrahams, I. (2011). Practical Work in Secondary Science: A Minds-on Approach. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Akinbobola, A. O., & Afolabi, F. (2010). Analysis of science process skills in West African senior secondary school certificate physics practical examinations in Nigeria Bulgarian Journal of Science & Education Policy, 4(1), 32-47.
Deacon, C., & Hajek, A. (2011). Student Perceptions of the Value of Physics Laboratories. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 943-977.
DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: theory and applications (3rd ed.). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Doran, R., Chan, F., Tamir, P., & Lenhardt, C. (2002). Science Educator’s Guide to Laboratory Assessment. Virginia: NSTA Press.
Edy, H. M. S., & Lilia, H. (2010). Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9(0), 142-146.
Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum: Developing science and technology education. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Hair, J. J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). USA: SAGE Publication.
Hidayah, M. F., & Rohaida, M. S. (2013). Phenomenographic study of students’ manipulative skills during transition from primary to secondary school. Jurnal Teknologi, 63(2), 71-75.
Khaparde, R. B., & Pradhan, H. C. (2002). Procedural understanding: A neglected aspect of physics laboratory training. Physics Education, 19(2), 147-154.
Lane, S., & Stone, C. A. (2006). Performance Assessment. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4th ed., pp. 387 - 432). Connecticut, USA: American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers.
Lawson, A. E., Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1989). A theory of instruction: Using the learning cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills.
Millar, R., Lubben, F., Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1994). Investigating in the school science laboratory: conceptual and procedural knowledge and their influence on performance. Research Papers in Education, 9(2), 207-248.
Ministry of Education. (2005). Curriculum Specifications PHYSICS Form 4. Putrajaya: Curriculum Development Centre.
Ministry of Education. (2009). Physics Practical Work Assessment (PEKA) Assessment Guide: SPM 2010. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Examination Syndicate.
Moni, R. W., Hryciw, D. H., Poronnik, P., Lluka, L. J., & Moni, K. B. (2007). Assessing core manipulative skills in a large, first-year laboratory. Advances in Physiology Education, 31, 266 - 269.
Musial, D., Nieminen, G., Thomas, J., & Burke, K. (2009). Foundations of Meaningful Educational Measurement. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
Ong, S. L. (2010). Assessment profile of Malaysia: high‐stakes external examinations dominate. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 91-103.
Prades, A., & Espinar, S. R. (2010). Laboratory assessment in chemistry: an analysis of the adequacy of the assessment process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 449-461.
Reiss, M., Abrahams, I., & Sharpe, R. (2012). Improving the Assessment of Practical Work in School Science. Retrieved from
Shultz, K. S., Whitney, D. J., & Zickar, M. J. (2014). Measurement theory in action: Case studies and exercises (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Solano-Flores, G., & Shavelson, R. J. (1997). Development of performance assessment in science: conceptual, practical and logistic issues. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(3), 16-25.
Wenning, C. J. (2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 4(2), 21-24.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top