Foresight Methods in Pedagogical Design of University Learning Environment
 
More details
Hide details
1
Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China
 
2
Vyatka State University, Russia
 
3
Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Russia
 
4
RUDN University (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia), Russia
 
5
Stolypin International Institute of Informatization and Public Administration, Russia
 
6
Moscow State Pedagogical University, Russia
 
7
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), Russia
 
8
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Russia
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-08-16
 
 
Publication date: 2017-08-16
 
 
Corresponding author
Rong Ju   

College of the Arts, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071001, China, +86 15830290702
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(8):5281-5293
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Currently, informational-educational environment has become one of the constitutive tendencies in the development of modern education and correlates with IT development in all spheres of human life. The availability of multiple possibilities for using information and communication technologies in education brings about variability in university learning environment design. The authors propose the use of foresight methodology to optimize educational content and structure didactic potential of learning environment. The mechanism of pedagogical design using foresight methodology is based on accommodation of subjective views of stakeholders in the education system, creation of a common vision of the informational and educational environment which involves objective prognostic information and the trends and tendencies in regional education development. The knowledge gained from foresight methodology made it possible to design informational and educational, or learning, environment at the university that is able to ensure the learning process meeting the expectations of all stakeholders as close as it is possible and affect the employment rate of the university graduates.
 
REFERENCES (38)
1.
Amsteus, M. (2008). Managerial Foresight: Concept and Measurement. Foresight, 10(1), 53–66.
 
2.
Bell, T., & Newton, H. (2013). Unplugging computer science. New York, NY: Routledge.
 
3.
Bishop, P. (2016). The University Foresight Network: The Search for Common Ground among Foresight Educators. World Future Review, 8(1), 6–11.
 
4.
Danyluk, A. Y., & Kulikov, I. E. (2008). Educational foresight in modern Russia. News of southern Federal University. Pedagogical science, 10, 13-21.
 
5.
Deng, F., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C. C., & Lee, M. H. (2014). The relationships among Chinese practicing teachers’ epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs about the use of ICT. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 245–256.
 
6.
Dibrova, J. N. (2014). Foresight as a modern practice of University management. The scientific journal ITMO. Series “Economy and ecological management”, 1, 56-65.
 
7.
Eremina, I. I. (2012). Forming information and communication competence of subjects of educational process in the conditions of information educational environment of the University. Scientific dialogue, (1). Retrieved from http://www.nauka-dialog.ru/ped....
 
8.
Gao, W., & Wang, W. F. (2017) The fifth geometric-arithmetic index of bridge graph and carbon nanocones. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, 23(1-2SI), 100-109.
 
9.
Gao, W., Farahani, M. R., Aslam, A., & Hosamani, S. (2017) Distance learning techniques for ontology similarity measuring and ontology mapping. Cluster Computing - The Journal of Networks Software Tools and Applications, 20(2SI), 959-968.
 
10.
Gaponenko, N. In. (2010). Beyond the horizon: using foresight to explore the future and develop adaptive strategies. Economic strategy, 1-2, 64-71.
 
11.
Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2009). Futures Research Methodology Version 3.0. Washington, DC: The Millennium Project.
 
12.
Goux-Baudiment, F. (2016). A Foresight Overarching Method: I. Looking for a Way to Bridge the Gap. World Future Review, 8(1), 12–23.
 
13.
Gusarova, M. N. (2014). The principles and theoretical bases of designing of information educational environment. Modern problems of science and education, (1). Retrieved from http://www.science-education.r....
 
14.
Hayward, P. (2005). From Individual to Social Foresight. Melbourne: Swinburne University.
 
15.
Henner, E. K. (2014). Highly developed information and educational environment of the University as a condition of reforming education. Education and science, 1, 54-72.
 
16.
Hines, A., & Gold, J. (2013). Professionalizing Foresight: Why Do It, Where It Stands, and What Needs to Be Done. Journal of Futures Studies, 17(4), 35–54.
 
17.
Hines, A., Gary, J., Daheim, C., & Van der Laan, L. (2016). Building Foresight Capacity: Toward a Foresight Competency Model. World Future Review, 8(4), 193-196.
 
18.
Jasvin, V. A. (2001). Educational environment: from modeling to design. Moscow: Meaning.
 
19.
Khairullina, E. R., Makhotkina, L. Yu., Kiryakova, A. V., Baranov, V. V., Maksimova, O. G., Khrisanova, E. G., Piralova, O. F., & Masalimova, A. R. (2016). The real and the ideal engineer-technologist in the view of employers and educators. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(1), 134-138.
 
20.
Khodyakova, N. V. (2012). Situational-environment approach to designing personal development education: methodological background and concept. Volgograd: Peremena.
 
21.
Kirilova, G. I., & Vlasova, V. K. (2014). Metadynamics of functioning of informational educational environment of a professional school. Education and self-development, 2(40), 92-97.
 
22.
Kolesnikova, I. A. (2013). Continuing education as a phenomenon of the XXI century: new perspectives of research. Lifelong education: the XXI century, 1, 2-18.
 
23.
Leontieva, O. V. (2009). Cultural and educational environment of the University as psychological and pedagogical problems. Education and society, 6, 106-111.
 
24.
Levin, K. (2000). Field theory in social Sciences. Moscow: The Sensor.
 
25.
Levina, E. Y. (2015). To the problem of development management education: a stakeholder approach. Kazan pedagogical journal, 6, 11-15.
 
26.
Levina, E. Y., Yevgrafova, O. G., Derdizova, F. V., Zagladina, E. N., Levchenkova, T. V., Murugova, V. V., Blinova, L. N., & Anfilatova, O. V. (2016). Educational systems scenarios development in modern conditions. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2(6), 76-81.
 
27.
Manuilov, Y. S. (2002). Environmental approach in education. N. Novgorod: Publishing House of Volga-Vyatka Academy of State Service.
 
28.
Ostroumova, E. N. (2011). Information educational environment of higher school as the factor of professional and personal self-development of the future specialist. Fundamental research, 4, 37-40.
 
29.
Privalov, A. N., Bogatyrev Y. I., & Romanov, V. A. (2017). Methodological approaches to organization of safe educational environment of the University. Education and science, 4, 169-183.
 
30.
Pugacheva N. B. (2010). Foresight as a component of the management of modern vocational education. Professional education in Russia and abroad, 1, 65-69.
 
31.
Robert, I. V., Panyukova S. V., & Kuznetsov, A. A. (2008). Information and communication technologies in education: textbook for pedagogical. Moscow: Drofa.
 
32.
Sakhieva, R. G., Khairullina, E. R., Khisamiyeva, L. G., Valeyeva, N. S., Masalimova, A. R., & Zakirova, V. G. (2015). Designing a structure of the modular competence-based curriculum and technologies for its implementation into higher vocational institutions. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 246-251.
 
33.
Shaidullina, A. R., Sinitzyn, O. V., Nabiyeva, A. R., Yakovlev, S. A., Maksimov, I. N., Gatina, A. R., & Akhmetov, L. G. (2015). Functions and Main Directions of Development of the Integrated Educational-Industrial Complex “College—University—Enterprise”. Review of European Studies, 7(4), 228-233.
 
34.
Shesternin, A. S. (2014). Informatization of education. Modern problems of information educational environment of informatization of studying process. The modern issues of informational education field. The scientific journal of the Kuban state agrarian University, 96(02). Retrieved from http://ej.kubagro.ru.
 
35.
Slobodchikov, V. I. (2000). About the concept of the educational environment in the concept of developing education. Moscow: Akopiants ROSS.
 
36.
Smirnova, M. N. (2012). Components of information educational environment and its functioning in the educational space of the University. Education, Science, Innovation: the southern dimension, 5, 43-51.
 
37.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715-728.
 
38.
Yarygin A. N., Aniskin, V. N., & Dobudko, T. V. (2014). The analysis of the main problems and features of modern information-educational environment. Vector of science of Togliatti state University, 3, 343 -346.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top