Learning styles in science education at university level: A systematic review
More details
Hide details
Almetyevsk State Oil Institute, Almetyevsk, RUSSIA
Financial University Under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RUSSIA
Vyatka State University, Kirov, RUSSIA
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
Online publication date: 2023-05-25
Publication date: 2023-07-01
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(7):em2293
In this systematic review study, it is aimed to summarize the findings and reach a conclusion about the role and importance of learning styles in science education at university level from 2007 to 2023. This paper analyzed the studies related to the learning styles in science education at university level. The original studies were extracted from Scopus database, and the review of the 21 selected journal articles revealed that the common feature of the studies in both groups was that learning styles in science education had a positive effect on both cognitive and affective factors. The relation between learning styles in science education at university level and some cognitive or affective factors was investigated. While some studies have found significant differences between these two variables, some studies have concluded that there is no significant relationship. According to the detailed analysis of each 21 articles, the content of the studies was coded as name of the author and year, profile of the participants, research type and major findings. The reviewed research has numerous implications for learning styles in science education at university level.
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969.
Allers, N. (2010). Teaching physiology to dental students: Matching teaching and learning styles in a South African dental school. Journal of Dental Education, 74(9), 986-992.
Almasri, F. (2022). Simulations to teach science subjects: Connections among students’ engagement, self-confidence, satisfaction, and learning styles. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7161-7181.
Alshammari, M. T., & Qtaish, A. (2019). Effective adaptive e-learning systems according to learning style and knowledge level. Journal of Information Technology Education, 18, 529-547.
Arslan, C., Gocmencelebi, S. I., & Tapan, M. S. (2009). Learning and reasoning styles of pre-service teachers’: Inductive or deductive reasoning on science and mathematics related to their learning style. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2460-2465.
Coffield, F. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Center.
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2010). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Center.
Coma-Roselló, T., Aguelo-Arguis, A., Álvarez, P., Sanz, C., & Baldassarri, S. (2018). Analysis of innovative approaches in the class using conceptual maps and considering the learning styles of students. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje [IEEE Ibero-American Journal of Learning Technologies], 13(4), 120-129.
Dincol-Ozgur, S. (2018). Effect of learning styles on prospective teachers’ self-regulated learning skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(4), 521-528.
Farkas, G. J., Mazurek, E., & Marone, J. R. (2016). Learning style versus time spent studying and career choice: Which is associated with success in a combined undergraduate anatomy and physiology course? Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(2), 121-131.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (2002). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Gabel, D., Samuel, K. V., Helgeson, S., McGuire, S., Novak, J., & Butzow, J. (1987). Science education research interests of elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(7), 659-677.
Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediated modeling in science education. Science & Education, 16, 653-697.
Harahap, F., Nasution, N. E. A., & Manurung, B. (2019). The effect of blended learning on student’s learning achievement and science process skills in plant tissue culture course. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 521-538.
Hung, H. C., & Young, S. S. C. (2021). Unbundling teaching and learning in a flipped thermal physics classroom in higher education powered by emerging innovative technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 89-99.
Jiraporncharoen, W., Angkurawaranon, C., Chockjamsai, M., Deesomchok, A., & Euathrongchit, J. (2015). Learning styles and academic achievement among undergraduate medical students in Thailand. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 12.
Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169-183.
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2014). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 227-248). Routledge.
Kubat, U. (2018). Identifying the individual differences among students during learning and teaching process by science teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 30-38.
Markowitz, D. G., & DuPre, M. J. (2007). Graduate experience in science education: The development of a science education course for biomedical science graduate students. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 6(3), 233-242.
McMahon, M. (2010). The use of instructional technology to impact student retention and attitudes in a college level geology course. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 2(4), 77-84.
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1-9.
Pablico, J. R., Diack, M., & Lawson, A. (2017). Differentiated instruction in the high school science classroom: Qualitative and quantitative analyses. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 16(7), 30-54.
Paiboonsithiwong, S., Kunanitthaworn, N., Songtrijuck, N., Wongpakaran, N., & Wongpakaran, T. (2016). Learning styles, academic achievement, and mental health problems among medical students in Thailand. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 13.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.
Riggs, E. M. (2005). Field‐based education and indigenous knowledge: Essential components of geoscience education for native American communities. Science Education, 89(2), 296-313.
Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2015). Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 64.
Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of augmented reality technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144, 103710.
Singh-Pillay, A., & Naidoo, J. (2020). Context matters: Science, technology and mathematics education lecturers’ reflections on online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 1125-1136.
Stone, D. C. (2021). Student success and the high school-university transition: 100 years of chemistry education research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 579-601.
Thanyaphongphat, J., & Panjaburee, P. (2019). Effects of a personalized ubiquitous learning support system based on learning style-preferred technology type decision model on university students’ SQL learning performance. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 13(3), 233-254.
Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., & Almeida, L. (2002). Science learning in virtual environments: A descriptive study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 471-488.
Ucar, D., & Yilmaz, S. (2023). Pre-service science teachers’ e-learning styles. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(1), 167.
Van Petegem, C., Deconinck, L., Mourisse, D., Maertens, R., Strijbol, N., Dhoedt, B., De Wever, B., Dawyndt, P., & Mesuere, B. (2023). Pass/fail prediction in programming courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(1), 68-95.
Virkus, S. (2019). The use of open badges in library and information science education in Estonia. Education for Information, 35(2), 155-172.
Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266-271.
Yang, Y. F., Lee, C. I., & Chang, C. K. (2016). Learning motivation and retention effects of pair programming in data structures courses. Education for Information, 32(3), 249-267.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top