The Cascade Model of Mathematics Teachers’ Professional Development in South Africa: How Well did it Suit Them?
More details
Hide details
University of Limpopo, Sovenga, SOUTH AFRICA
Online publication date: 2019-05-09
Publication date: 2019-05-09
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2019;15(10):em1761
This paper discusses the extent to which the professional development (cascade model) met its goal of improving mathematics teaching and learning during the implementation of National Curriculum Statement in South Africa. Fifty mathematics teachers from ten public secondary schools in Vhembe District in Limpopo Province of South Africa were chosen purposively. Using a qualitative approach, data were collected through a focus group discussion with five mathematics teachers at each of the ten schools. Teachers disapproved the manner in which the workshops were conducted claiming that they were disconnected from classroom practices. The conclusion was that: (a) the success of in-service programs should be determined by the way that the ideas, knowledge and skills learnt are implemented in a classroom setting; (b) for any in-service program that introduces teachers to a different instructional approach from the traditional one, it has to impact on teachers’ concerns (be they self-oriented, task-oriented or impact-oriented).
ASCD (2010). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: On-site staff development. Retrieved from
Attard, K. (2017). Personally driven professional development: reflective self-study as a way for teachers to take control of their own professional development. Teacher Development, 21(1), 40-56.
Bett, H. K. (2016). The cascade model of teachers’ continuing professional development in Kenya: A time for change? Cogent Education, 3(1), 1139439.
Blank, R. K., De las Alas, N., & Smith, C. (2008). Does teacher professional development have effects on teaching and learning? Analysis of evaluation findings from programs for mathematics and science teachers in 14 states. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Bygstad, B., & Munkvold, B. (2007). The significance of member validation in qualitative analysis: experiences from a longitudinal case study. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bygstad, B., & Munkvold, B. E. (2007, January). The significance of member validation in qualitative analysis: Experiences from a longitudinal case study. In System sciences, 2007. hicss 2007. 40th annual hawaii international conference on (pp. 243b-243b). IEEE.
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it.
Covay Minor, E., Desimone, L., Caines Lee, J., & Hochberg, E. D. (2016). Insights on How to Shape Teacher Learning Policy: The Role of Teacher Content Knowledge in Explaining Differential Effects of Professional Development. Education policy analysis archives, 24(61).
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Donnell, L. A., & Gettinger, M. (2015). Elementary school teachers’ acceptability of school reform: Contribution of belief congruence, self-efficacy, and professional development. Teaching and teacher education, 51, 47-57.
Easton, L. B. (2009). Protocols for professional learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2004). Elusive equity: education reform in post-apartheid South Africa. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41-67.
Giorgi, A. (Ed.). (1985). Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 8-22). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Gunnarsdóttir, G. H., & Pálsdóttir, G. (2010). Lesson study in teacher education: A tool to establish a learning community. Retrieved from http://www.cerme7.univ.rzeszow..._.
Heck, R. H. (2007). Examining the relationship between teacher quality as an organizational property of schools, and students’ achievement and growth rates. Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 399-432.
Heck, R. H. (2009). Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: Investigating a multilevel cross-classified model. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(2), 227-249.
Heppner, P. P., & Heppner, M. J. (2004). Writing and publishing your thesis. Dissertation& Research: A guide for students in the helping professionals, (4thEds), Thomson Brooks/Cole: Canada.
Hill, H., & Ball, D. (2009). The curious--and crucial--case of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(2), 68-71. Retrieved from
Hord, S. M., & Tobia, E. F. (2015). Reclaiming our teaching profession: The power of educators learning in community. Teachers College Press.
Hunzicker, J. L. (2010). Characteristics of effective professional development: a checklist. [online]. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED510366). Retrieved from
Hunzicker, J. L. (2011). Characteristics of effective professional development: a checklist. Professional Development in Education, 37(2), 177-179.
Jansen, J. D., & Christie, P. (eds) (1999). Changing curriculum: studies on outcomes-based education in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta.
Jansen, J. D., & Taylor, N. (2003). Educational change in South Africa 1994–2003: case studies in large scale education reform. Washington DC: World Bank.
Joubert, M., & Sutherland, R. (2008). Researching CPD for teachers of mathematics: A review of the literature. National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics.
Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of in-service education, 31(2), 235-250.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2004). Methods of educational and science research: an integrated approach (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lee, H. L. (2007). Developing an effective professional development model to enhance teachers’ conceptual understanding and pedagogical strategies in mathematics. Journal of Educational Thought, 41(2), 125-144.
Lewis, C. (2008). Lesson study. In Easton, L.B. Powerful designs for professional learning. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
Lodico, M., Spaulding, D., & Voegtle, K. (2006). Methods in educational research: From Theory to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bas.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing Professional Development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Hewson, P. W., & Love, N. (2010). Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
McAleavy, T., & Elwick, A. (2016). School Improvement in London: A Global Perspective. Education Development Trust.
Meijs, C., Prinsen, F. R., & de Laat, M. F. (2016). Social learning as approach for teacher professional development: how well does it suit them? Educational media international, 53(2), 85-102.
Nelson, B. S., & Sassi, A. (2007). What math teachers need most. The Education Digest, 72(6), 54-56.
Ono, Y. (2008). Lesson study as professional development of teachers in South Africa and in Afghanistan. Paper presented at the Comparative and International Education Society 52nd Annual Conference, Teachers College, New York.
Ono, Y., & Ferreira, J. (2010). A case study of continuing teacher professional development through lesson study in South Africa. South Africa Journal of Education, 30(1), 4-10.
Periodical Teachers’ News Letter (October, 2010). The Teacher News Paper.
Salleh, H. (2016). Facilitation for professional learning community conversations in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 285-300.
Shank, G. D. (2006). Qualitative research: A personal skills approach. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory.
Stronge, J. H. (2007). Qualities of effective teachers (2nd Ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tam, A. C. F. (2015). The role of a professional learning community in teacher change: A perspective from beliefs and practices. Teachers and Teaching, 21(1), 22-43.
Taylor, N., & Vinjevold, P. (1999). Getting learning right: report to the president’s education initiative research project. Johannesburg: Joint Education Trust.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. Y. Y. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development: best evidence synthesis iteration. (Wellington, New Zealand Ministry of Education.
Trust, T., & Horrocks, B. (2017). ‘I never feel alone in my classroom’: teacher professional growth within a blended community of practice. Professional Development in Education, 43(4), 645-665.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2005). Lessons learned from curriculum differentiation, instruction, and assessment. Presentation at the National Curriculum Network Conference, Williamsburg, VA.
Wiliam, D. (2008). Changing classroom practice. Educational leadership, 65(4), 36-41.