The Effectiveness of Activation of Prior Mathematical Knowledge During Problem-solving in Physics
More details
Hide details
Radboud University Nijmegen, THE NETHERLANDS
Delft University of Technology, THE NETHERLANDS
Online publication date: 2020-01-26
Publication date: 2020-01-26
Corresponding author
Süleyman Turşucu   

Radboud University Nijmegen, THE NETHERLANDS
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2020;16(4):em1837
Mathematics is of major importance in science subjects. Unfortunately, students struggle with applying mathematics in science subjects, especially physics. In this qualitative study we demonstrate that transfer of algebraic skills from mathematics in physics class can be improved by using pre-knowledge effectively. We designed shift-problems involving instructional models to carry out small interventions in textbook problems. Shift-problems are feasible for teachers to adopt in teaching practice. To gain insight in the extent to which students improved their application of algebraic skills including basic skills and symbol sense behaviour, we selected three grade-10 physics students. In round one, the students solved algebraic physics problems as they appear in physics textbooks. Two weeks later in round two, the same problems were presented as shift problems to them where we activated prior mathematical knowledge by providing systematic rule-based algebraic hints at the start of these tasks. Algebraic skills were presented in a similar way to how these were learned in mathematics textbooks. We observed that students’ problem-solving abilities increased from 48.5 % in the first to 81.8 % in the second round, indicating the effectiveness of how we implemented shift-problems. Furthermore, we discussed the implications of our results for the international science audience.
1. (2019, November 22). Retrieved from
Alink, N., Asselt, R. van, & Braber, N. den (2012). Samenhang en afstemming wiskunde en de profielvakken [Coherence between mathematics and the profile subjects]. Utrecht / Enschede, The Netherlands: cTWO / SLO.
Andrá, C., Lindström, P., Arzarello, F., Holmqvist, K., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2015). Reading mathematics representations: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 237-259.
Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol Sense: Informal Sense-Making in Formal Mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 24-35.
Arcavi, A. (2005). Developing and using symbol sense in mathematics. For the learning of mathematics, 25(2), 42-47.
Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2010). Preservice mathematics and science teachers in an integrated teacher preparation program for grades 7–12: A 3-year study of attitudes and perceptions related to integration. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 97-115.
Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2012). A longitudinal look at attitudes and perceptions related to the integration of mathematics, science, and technology education. School science and mathematics, 112(1), 20-30.
Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (Eds.). (2014). Initiatives in Mathematics and Science Education with Global Implications. Columbus, OH: International Consortium for Research in Science and Mathematics Education.
Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Symbol sense behavior in digital activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(3), 43-49.
Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Charters, E. (2003). The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Education Journal, 12(2).
Dierdorp, A., Bakker, A., van Maanen, & J., Eijkelhof, H. (2014). Meaningful statistics in professional practices as a bridge between mathematics and science: an evaluation of a design research project. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(9), 1-15.
Drijvers, P. (Ed.) (2011). Secondary algebra education. Revisiting topics and themes and exploring the unknown. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Furner, J., & Kumar, D. (2007). The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A stand for Teacher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 185-189.
Geiger, V. S, Muir, T., & Lamb, J. (2016). Video-stimulated recall as a catalyst for teacher professional learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(5), 457-475.
Girvan, C., Conneely, C., &Tangney, B. (2016). Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58(206), 129-139.
Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A. Kelly, & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 517-545). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(5), 113.
Haskell, R. E. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction and reasoning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.). (2017). Learning to solve complex scientific problems. Routledge.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Leahy, S., & Wiliam, D. (2012). From teachers to schools: scaling up professional development for formative assessment. Assessment and learning, 2, 49-71.
Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 17–20.
Lobato, J., Rhodehamel, B., & Hohensee, C. (2012). “Noticing” as an alternative transfer of learning process. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(3), 433-482.
Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591-613.
Maher, C. A., & Sigley, R. (2014). Task-based interviews in mathematics education. In S. Lernman (ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media.
Mestre, J. P. (Ed.). (2005). Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2019, November 23). Retrieved from
National Research Council. (2013). The mathematical sciences in 2025. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Netherlands institute for curriculum development. (2018, May 27). Retrieved from
OECD. (2018, September 3). Retrieved from
Ottink, et al. (2014). Systematische Natuurkunde, 8e editie basisboek, 4 vwo [Systematic Physics, 8th edition basic textbook, first year senior pre-university education]. Amersfoort, The Netherlands: ThiemeMeulenhoff.
Palha, S., Dekker, R., & Gravemeijer, K. (2015). The effect of shift-problem lessons in the mathematics classsroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1589-1623.
Palha, S., Dekker, R., Gravemeijer, G., & Van Hout-Wolters, B., (2013). Developing shift problems to foster geometrical proof and understanding. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 32(2), 142-159.
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The journal of mathematical behavior, 22(4), 405-435.
Rebello, N. S., Cui, L., Bennett, A. G., Zollman, D. A., & Ozimek, D. J. (2007). Transfer of learning in problem solving in the context of mathematics and physics. Learning to solve complex scientific problems, 223-246.
Redish, E. F. (2017). Analysing the competency of mathematical modelling in physics. In Key Competences in Physics Teaching and Learning (pp. 25-40). Springer, Cham.
Reichard, L. A., Dijkhuis, J. H., Admiraal, C. J., Vaarwerk te, G. J., Verbeek, J. A., Jong de, G., ... Voets, S. (2014). Getal en Ruimte, wiskunde A, deel 1 [Numbers & Space, mathematics A, part 1]. Houten, The Netherlands: EPN.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587-597.
Roorda, G. (2012). Ontwikkeling in verandering; ontwikkeling van wiskundige bekwaamheid van leerlingen met betrekking tot het concept afgeleide [Development of ‘change’; the development of students’ mathematical proficiency with respect to the concept of derivative]. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
Roorda, G., Goedhart, M., & Vos, P. (2014). An actor-oriented transfer perspective on high school students’ development of the use of procedures to solve problems on “rate of change”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 863-889.
Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of U.S. mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525¬-559.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). 100 Years of curriculum history, Theory, and Research. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 105-111.
Schoenfeld, A. H., & Sloane, A. H. (Eds.). (2016). Mathematical thinking and problem solving. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189.
Sonneveld, et al. (2014). Overal Natuurkunde 4 vwo, 4e druk [Everywhere Physics, 4th edition, first year of upper secondary education]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Noorhoff Uitgevers B.V.
Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2010). The influence of curriculum on student learning. In B. Reyes, R. Reyes, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends and future directions (pp. 351-362). Reston, VA: NCTM.
TIMMS & PIRLS. (2018, July 24). Retrieved from
Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., & de Vries M. J. (2018b). Search for symbol sense behavior: students in upper secondary education solving algebraic physics problems. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 1-27.
Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., Flipse, S., & de Vries, M. J. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs about improving transfer of algebraic skills from mathematics into physics in senior pre-university education. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 587-604.
Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., Flipse, S., Jongbloed, G., & de Vries, M. J. (2018a). Teachers’ beliefs systems about improving transfer of algebraic skills from mathematics into physics in senior pre-university education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1-27.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: an example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics 54, 9-35.
van Zanten, M., & van den Heuvel - Panhuizen, M. (2014). Freedom of design: the multiple faces of subtraction in Dutch primary school textbooks. In Y. Li, & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 231-259). New York, NY: Springer.
Walshe, G., Johnston, J., & McClelland, G. (2017). Integrating mathematics into science: design, development and evaluation of a curriculum model. In Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research (pp. 309-321). Springer, Cham.
Wenger, R. H. (1987). Cognitive science and algebra learning. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 217-251). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wong, V. J. (2018). The relationship between school science and mathematics education (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from