SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER
The Effects of Training – Based on Knowles’ Adult Education Principles – On Participants
 
More details
Hide details
1
Final International University, Kyrenia, N. CYPRUS
 
2
Cukurova University, Adana, TURKEY
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-11-25
 
 
Publication date: 2017-11-25
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(12):8405-8414
 
This article has been presented in ICES 2017 - International Conference on Environmental Sciences & Educational Studies. This article belongs to the special issue " Interdisciplinary Research on the Environmental Education, Educational Studies in Sustainability & Instructional Technologies and Designs".
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In this research, it is planned to identify the effect of adult education principles of Knowles based first aid training on participants. Accordingly, this study aims to identify academic success of participants and analyze their views related to their first aid knowledge levels before and after the application of first aid training. Also, participants’ views about training have been taken after first aid training. Within this context, research problem is: “What is the effect of first aid training on participants? Mixed design research model has been used in this research. Study group of this research include 120 participants from different sectors and institutions who attend first aid training. Within the scope of this study, academic success test, participants’ views about their first aid knowledge levels survey and participants’ views about training survey have been applied. Within the context of this study, it is concluded that first aid training -which is planned on basis of adult education principles- increases academic success related to first aid topics and that participants’ views about their first aid knowledge change in a positive way after first aid training program.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Balcı, A. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntem, Teknik ve İlkeler. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
 
2.
Barnett, D. (2008). Adult Education: Motivation and Recruitment of Working Adults in the Pursuit of Higher Education (Master Thesis). Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
 
3.
Bilir, N. (2016). İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Profili: Türkiye. Ankara: Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü, ILO Türkiye Ofisi.
 
4.
Birzer, M. L. (2004). Andragogy: Student centered classrooms in criminal justice programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 15, 2, 393-411,.
 
5.
Bye, D., Pushkar, D., & Conway, M. (2007). Motivation, Interest And Positive Affect In Traditional And Nontraditional Undergraduate Students. American Association for Adult and Continuing Education.
 
6.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (Sixth edition). London: Routledge.
 
7.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
 
8.
European Commission. (2002). European Report on quality indicators of lifelong learning. Fifteen quality indicators. European Commission Report. Brussels: Directorate-General for Education and Culture.
 
9.
Forrest III, S. P., & Peterson, T. (2006). It’s called andragogy. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(1), 113-122.
 
10.
İnan, H. F., Kurt, Z., & Kubilay, İ. (2011). Temel İlk Yardım Uygulamaları Eğitim Kitabı. Ankara: T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Bakanlığı Temel Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
 
11.
Johnston, C. D. (2010). Motivators Of Adult Women Enrolled In A Community College (PhD Thesis). The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
 
12.
Karasar, N. (2002). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
 
13.
Kaza Araştırma ve İnceleme Kurulu (KAİK). (2013). Ulaştırma Kaza İstatistikleri Raporu. Ankara: Ulaştırma, Denizcilik ve Haberleşme Bakanlığı.
 
14.
Knowles, M., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (5th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
 
15.
Kureckova, V., Gabrhel, V., Zamecnik, P., Rezac, P., Zaoral, A., &Hobl, J. (2017) First aid as an important traffic safety factor – evaluation of the experience–based training. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., 9, 5.
 
16.
Li, F., Sheng, x., Zhang, J., Jiang, F., & Shen, X. (2014) Effects of pediatric first aid training on preschool teachers: a longitudinal cohort study in China. BMC Pediatrics, 14, 209.
 
17.
Lindeman, E. C. (1926). The meaning of adult education (Redistributed ed. 1989 ed.). NY: New Republic. Company.
 
18.
Lingard, H. (2002). The effect of first aid training on Australian construction workers’ occupational health and safety motivation and risk control behavior. Journal of Safety Research, 33, 209-30.
 
19.
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse.
 
20.
Ozuah, P. O. (2005). First, there was pedagogy and then came andragogy. Einstein Journal of Biology & Medicine, 21(2), 83-87.
 
21.
Reischmann, J. (2004). Andragogy. History, Meaning, Context, Function. Retrieved on August 2017 from http://www.andragogy.net.
 
22.
Resmi Gazete. (2004). İlk Yardım Yönetmeliğinde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik. Retrieved on July 2017 from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/....
 
23.
Singer, A. J., Gulla, J., Thode, H. C., & Cronin, K. A. (2004). Pediatric first aid knowledge among parents. PediatrEmerg Care, 20(12), 808-11.
 
24.
Terehoff, I. I. (2002) Elements of Adult Learning in Teacher Professional Development. National Association of Secondary School Principals, V86, N632.
 
25.
Thompson, M. A., & Deis, M. H. (2004). Andragogy for adult learners in higher education. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 8(3), 77-89.
 
26.
Turgut, M., F. (1992). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Metotları. Ankara: Saydam Matbaacılık.
 
27.
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TUİK) (2017) 2016 Karayolu Trafik İstatistikleri Haber Bülteni. Retrieved on July 2017 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr.
 
28.
World Health Organization Europe. (1998). Health 21- health for all in the 21st century. Copenhagen: WHO European Health for all series.
 
29.
Yanpar Şahin, T. (2003). Student teachers’ perceptions of ınstructional technology: Developing materials based on a constructivist approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 67–74.
 
30.
Yoshimoto, K., Inenaga, Y., & Yamada, H. (2007). Pedagogy and andragogy in higher education - A comparison between Germany, the UK and Japan. European Journal of Education, 42(1), 75-98.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top