Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
KM Theory Applied in Accounting and Statistics Education: Case on the Cost of Debt
1
School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology No.15 Bei-san-huan Dong-lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, P.R. China
Online publication date: 2017-07-31
Publication date: 2017-07-31
Corresponding author
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(8):4847-4856
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study examines the impact of audit opinions on the cost of debt based on accounting education and knowledge management theory. The empirical results of whole sample regression show that audit opinions are negatively correlated with the cost of debt and financial marketization weakens the effect of audit opinions on debt pricing. The subsample regression results of audit opinions indicate that financial marketization is negatively correlated with the cost of debt only in companies with modified audit opinions. This implies that audit opinions play a more important role in debt pricing compared to the financial marketization of companies’ localities.
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 57-116.
2.
Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2012). Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(4), 617-636.
3.
Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2010). Formal versus informal finance: evidence from China. Review of Financial Studies, 23(8), 3048-3097.
4.
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2006). A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(11), 2945-2966.
5.
Blackwell, D. W., Norland, T. R., & Winters, D. B. (1998). The value of audit assurance: evidence from loan pricing. Journal of Accounting Research, 36(1), 57-70.
6.
Chen, P. F., He, S., Ma, Z., & Stice, D. (2016). The information role of audit opinions in debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 121-144.
7.
Church, B. K., Davis, S. M., & Mccracken, S. A. (2008). The auditor’s reporting model: a literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons, 22(1), 69-90.
8.
Cui, A. S., Griffith, D. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2005). The influence of competitive intensity and market dynamism on knowledge management capabilities of multinational corporation subsidiaries. Journal of International Marketing, 13(3), 32-53.
9.
Darroch J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101-115.
10.
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.
11.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Gleason, C. A., Heitzman, S., & Melendrez, K. (2008). Auditor fees and cost of debt. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 23(1), 1-22.
12.
Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. (2011). NERI INDEX of marketization for China’s provinces: 2011 report. Beijing: Economic Science Press.
13.
Fortin, S., & Pittman, J. (2007). The role of auditor choice in debt pricing in private firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), 859-896.
14.
Gold, A. H., Malhortra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
15.
Janvrin, D. J., & Watson, M. W. (2017) “Big Data”: A new twist to accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 38, 3-8.
16.
Jiang, J. (2008). Beating earnings benchmarks and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 377-416.
17.
Karjalainen, J. (2008). Auditor choice and cost of debt financing for private SMEs. Working paper, University of Kuopio.
18.
Karjalainen, J. (2011). Audit quality and cost of debt capital for private firms: evidence from Finland. International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), 88-108.
19.
Lennox, C., Wu, X., & Zhang T. (2016). The effect of audit adjustments on earnings quality: evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(2-3), 545-562.
20.
Liao, S. H., & Wu, C. C. (2010). System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1096-1103.
21.
Luo, Y., & Park, S. H. (2001). Strategic alignment and performance of market-seeking MNCs in China. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2), 141-155.
22.
Malone, D. (2002). Knowledge management: a model for organizational learning. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3, 111-123.
23.
Mansi, S. A., Maxwell, W. F., & Miller, D. P. (2004). Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from the bond market. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(4), 755-793.
24.
Massingham, P. (2014a). An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1-managing knowledge resources. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1075-1100.
25.
Massingham, P. (2014b). An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 2-managing knowledge flows and enablers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1101-1126.
26.
Menon, K., & Williams, D. (2010). Investor reaction to going concern audit reports. The Accounting Review, 85(6), 2075-2105.
27.
Mills, A. M., & Smith, T. A. (2011). Knowledge management and organizational performance: a decomposed view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 156-171.
28.
Minnis, M. (2011). The value of financial statement verification in debt financing: evidence from private U. S. firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(2), 457-506.
29.
Mutchler, J., Hopwood, W., & Mckeown, J. (1997). The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), 295-310.
30.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
32.
Ohlson, J. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131.
33.
Oluikpe, P. (2012). Developing a corporate knowledge management strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 862-878.
34.
Peev, E. (2015). Institutions, economic liberalization and firm growth: evidence from European transition economies. European Journal of Law and Economics, 40(1), 149-174.
35.
Pittman, J., & Fortin, S. (2004). Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital in newly public firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), 113-136.
36.
Rahaman, M., & Zaman, A. A. (2013). Management quality and the cost of debt: does management matter to lenders?.Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(3), 854-874.
37.
Shah, M., Rahneva, N., & Ahmed, R. (2014). Knowledge management practice at a Bulgarian bank: a case study. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), 54-69.
38.
Sledgianowski, D., Gomaa, M., & Tan, C. (2017). Toward integration of Big Data, technology and information systems competencies into the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education, 38, 81-93.
39.
Tirole, J. (2007). The theory of corporate finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
40.
Wang, T. S. (2013). Design and assessment of joyful mobile navigation systems based on TAM and integrating learning models applied on ecological teaching activity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 191-200.
41.
Wu, Y. W., Lin, Y. A., Wen, M. H., Perng, Y. H., & Hsu I. T. (2016). Design, analysis and user acceptance of architectural design education in learning system based on knowledge management theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(11), 2835-2849.
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
