RESEARCH PAPER
A New Mental Experience Quantification and Emotion Prediction Model for E-Learning Users
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Ningde Normal University, Ningde, CHINA
 
 
Online publication date: 2018-04-21
 
 
Publication date: 2018-04-21
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(6):2623-2638
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
At present, there exists a lack of an in-depth study on the quality of service evaluation of computer systems from the perspective of user psychological experience. This paper proposes an overall model for prediction of user psychological experience which is based on the environmental analysis of E-learning, the quantitative evaluation of user psychological experience and emotion. First, this study analyzes the impact of usability, usefulness, emotion and other factors on the psychological experience of E-learning users. Next, we use the resource coverage rate, recommendation hit rate and other indicators to measure usability and usefulness that are to construct the feature weight matrix and then use the AHP to quantify the overall user psychological experience evaluation model. The partial least squares regression method is adopted to take the individual characteristics of the learners as independent variables, and the characteristics of negative emotion regulation strategies as the variables. The proposed model can effectively find the E-learning system experience in the shortcomings of user psychology through a practical application. The results of this study can be used to build a more suitable quantitative evaluation method of user psychological examination for further study the characteristics of emotions affecting the user’s psychological experience.
 
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-learning theoretical framework. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 292-307.
 
2.
Bellavista, P., Corradi, A., Fanelli, M., & Foschini, L. (2012). A survey of context data distribution for mobile ubiquitous systems. Acm Computing Surveys, 44(4), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1145/233311....
 
3.
Broekens, J., & Brinkman, W. (2013). Affect Button: A method for reliable and valid affective self-report. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(6), 641-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhc....
 
4.
Buchholz, T., Küpper, A., & Schiffers, M. (2003). Quality of context: what it is and why we need it. Proceedings of the 10th Workshop of the OpenView University Association: OVUA’03.
 
5.
Calvo, R., & D’Mello, S. (2010). Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1(1), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC....
 
6.
Chang, C. C., Liang C. Y., Chou, P. N., & Lin, G. Y. (2017). Is game-based learning better in flow experience and various types of cognitive load than non-game-based learning? Perspective from multimedia and media richness. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
 
7.
Chen, S. C., Yen, D. C., & Hwang, M. (2012). Factors influencing the continued intention to the usage of Web 2.0: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 933-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
 
8.
Chu, T. H., & Chen, Y. Y. (2016). With good we become good: understanding e-learning adoption by theory of planned behavior and group influences. Computers & Education, 92–93, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
9.
Clark, L. M., & Wrona, S. (2016). A sensory & emotional experience: pediatric chronic pain & mental health. Pain Management Nursing, 17(2), 97-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.....
 
10.
Dong, Y., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic gdm with preference relation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 45(4), 780-792. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2....
 
11.
Dyson, R., & Renk, K. (2006). Freshmen Adaptation to University Life: Depressive Symptoms, Stress and Coping. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(10), 1231-1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.2....
 
12.
Hannigan, B., Edwards, D., & Burnard, P. (2004). Stress and Stress Management in Clinical Psychology: Findings from a Systematic Review. Journal of Mental Health, June, 13(3), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382....
 
13.
Harrati, N., Bouchrika, I., Tari, A., & Ladjailia, A. (2016). Exploring user satisfaction for e-learning systems via usage-based metrics and system usability scale analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 463-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
 
14.
Hwang, Y. J., Al-Arabiat, M., Shin, D. H., & Lee, Y. H. (2016). Understanding information proactiveness and the content management system adoption in pre-implementation stage. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
 
15.
Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
16.
Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continued intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54, 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
17.
Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. https://doi.org/10.1080/104473....
 
18.
Li, Z., Wen, G., & Xie, N. (2015). An approach to fuzzy soft sets in decision making based on grey relational analysis and dempster–shafer theory of evidence: an application in medical diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 64(3), 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artm....
 
19.
Lin, J. L., & Lin, C. L. (2002). The use of the orthogonal array with grey relational analysis to optimize the electrical discharge machining process with multiple performance characteristics. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 42(2), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-....
 
20.
Liu, Y. C. & Huang, Y. M. (2015). Using the UTAUT Model to Examine the Acceptance Behavior of Synchronous Collaboration to Support Peer Translation. JALT CALL Journal, 11(1), 77-91.
 
21.
Malek, A., Ebrahimnejad, S., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2017). An improved hybrid grey relational analysis approach for green resilient supply chain network assessment. Sustainability, 9(8), 1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081....
 
22.
Manzoor, A. (2010). Quality of context in pervasive systems: models, techniques, and thesis, applications. PhD School of Computer Science, Wien TU.
 
23.
Moridis, C., & Economides, A. (2008). Toward Computer-Aided Affective Learning Systems: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(4), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.39.....
 
24.
Ortigosa, A., Martín, J., & Carro, R. (2014). Sentiment analysis in Facebook and its application to e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 527-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
 
25.
Reyes-Aguilar, A., & Barrios, F. A. (2016). A preliminary study of sex differences in emotional experience. Psychological Reports, 118(2), 337. https://doi.org/10.1177/003329....
 
26.
Sheikh, K., Wegdam, M., & Sinderen, M. V. (2007). Middleware Support for Quality of Context in Pervasive Context-Aware Systems. IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (Vol.13, pp.461-466). https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM....
 
27.
Sinclair, P., Kable, A., & Levettjones, T. (2016). The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 57(1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnu....
 
28.
Wang, L., Sharkh, S., Chipperfield, A., & Cruden, A. (2017). Dispatch of vehicle-to-grid battery storage using an analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(4), 2952-2965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.20....
 
29.
Zhou, W., & Xu, Z. (2016). Asymmetric hesitant fuzzy sigmoid preference relations in the analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences, 358–359, 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top