Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER
Analysis of the Spot Market’s T+1 Trading System Effects on the Stock Index Futures Market
1
College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, CHINA
2
China Center for Social Computing and Analytics, Tianjin, 300072, CHINA
3
Key Laboratory of Computing and Analytics of Complex Management Systems, Tianjin, 300072, CHINA
Online publication date: 2017-11-16
Publication date: 2017-11-16
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(12):7679-7693
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
T+0 trading system, or day trading system, which allows the investors to buy and sell shares in one day, is a universal trading system in international markets. By contrast, T+1 trading system, which is implemented in China’s stock market, allows investors to sell shares which are bought today only on the next day. T+1 trading system in spot market is a Chinese problem left over by history, and a characteristic in Chinese market. Stock index futures, the financial derivatives based on the stock, are the products of the development of the capital market at certain stage. For the stock index futures are generated based on the stock, they must be closely related. On that basis, what’s the impact of the Chinese special T+1 trading system in spot market on the pricing efficiency, market liquidity and market volatility of the stock index futures market? The paper adopted the method based on the agent-based computational finance which’s different from the traditional method, and built the agent-based computational cross-market platform which includes both several stocks and stock index futures based on MASON. The paper simulated the experiment on the platform to look out the effect on the market quality of the stock index futures market when T+1 trading system in spot market turned into T+0 trading system, consisting mainly of the efficiency of price discovery, market liquidity, market volatility and arbitrage investors’ order submission behavior. The results showed that, compared with the T+1 trading system in spot market, T+0 trading system improved the efficiency of price discovery and market liquidity of stock index futures market, did not raise market volatility, enhance the enthusiasm of arbitrage investors’ order submission behavior. From the perspective of the stock index futures market, we believe that we should restore the T+0 trading system in stock market timely, so as to active the market and improve the efficiency of market information diffusion, to promote the steady and sound environment of the stock index futures market.
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Balakrishnan, N., Gopinatha, J., Goswami D, & Shanker, L. (2014). Parallel computing strategies in the analysis of the inhibiting effect of price limits on futures prices [J]. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 26(9), 1666-1678.
2.
Bessembinder, H., & Seguin, P. J. (1992). Futures‐trading activity and stock price volatility [J]. The Journal of Finance, 47(5), 2015-2034.
3.
Bian, J., & Su, T. (2010). T+1 trading system and Chinese warrant market premium [J]. Financial Research, (6), 143-161.
4.
Cacli, E. C., & Mandaci, P. E. (2013). The long-run relationship between the spot and futures markets under multiple regime-shifts: Evidence from Turkish derivatives exchange [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 4206-4212.
5.
Cai, X., & Liu, F. (2014). Micro fundamental exploration on the stock index futures’ macro-stabilization effect: based on the empirical examination of the Hushen300 stock index futures’ restriction on the stock market’s positive-feedback trading [J]. Security Market Guide, (12), 20-25.
6.
Chan, K. A. (1992). further analysis of the lead-lag relationship between the cash market and stock index futures market [J]. Review of financial studies, 5(1), 123-152.
7.
Chen, C., & Huang, Y. (2014). Research on the spillover effects and the dynamic relationship between the stock index futures and the spot market— Empirical analysis based on the markets of China, US, Japan and HK [J]. Macro-Economy Research, (6), 113-123.
8.
Chen, H. (1998). Price limits, overreaction, and price resolution in futures markets [J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 18(3), 243-263.
9.
Chen, W. (2011). Empirical research on the orders’ transparency’s effects to the market quality [J]. Security Market Guide, (12), 2938-2938.
10.
Chen, Y., Wu, Z.，& Wang, Y. (2014). Multiple markets’ transactions and price discovery of Hushen300 index derivatives securities [J]. Journal of Management Science, 17(12), 75-84.
11.
Chiarella, C., Iori, G., & Perelló, J. (2009). The impact of heterogeneous trading rules on the limit order book and order flows [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33(3), 525-537.
12.
Dutt, H. R., & Harris, L. E. (2005). Position limits for cash‐settled derivative contracts [J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 25(10), 945-965.
13.
Gai, H., & Zhang, L. (2006). Comparison of the investment risks under the trading system of T+0 and T+1 system [J]. College Journal of Harbin Business University: Social science page, 22(5), 122-125.
14.
Ge, Y., & Zhang, L. (2009). The effects of T+1 trading system on Chinese stock market’s volatility: empirical analysis based on the time series date from 1992-2008 [J]. Economic Forum, (3), 45-48.
15.
Hamao, Y., & Hasbrouck, J. (1995). Securities trading in the absence of dealers: Trades and quotes on the Tokyo Stock Exchange [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 8(3), 849-878.
16.
Hua, R., & Chen, B. (2006). Price limit regulation’s effects on the stock index futures market’s price discovery process and volatility: based on the empirical research of Shanghai Futures Exchange [J]. Asia and Pacific Journal of Finance, 23(5), 86-93.
17.
Judge, A, & Reancharoen, T. (2014). An empirical examination of the lead–lag relationship between spot and futures markets: Evidence from Thailand [J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 29, 335-358.
18.
Kang, S. H., Cheong, C., & Yoon, S. M. (2013). Intraday volatility spillovers between spot and futures indices: Evidence from the Korean stock market [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392(8), 1795-1802.
19.
Kavussanos M. G., Visvikis, I. D., & Alexakis, P. D. (2008). The Lead‐Lag Relationship Between Cash and Stock Index Futures in a New Market [J]. European Financial Management, 14(5), 1007-1025.
20.
Kobayashi, S., & Hashimoto, T. (2007). Analysis of circuit breakers using artificial stock market [C]. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics (AROB07), 260-263.
21.
Kobayashi, S., & Hashimoto, T. (2011). Benefits and limits of circuit breaker: Institutional design using artificial futures market [J]. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 7(2), 355-372.
22.
Lei, J. (2010). Empirical research on the decomposition of the bid-ask spread in Chinese stock market [D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China.
23.
Liu, T., & Ye, W. (2008). Rotary trading days: based on the empirical research of Shanghai security market [J]. New Finance, (3), 38-42.
24.
Mizuta, T., Izumi, K., Yagi, I., Yoshimura, S. (2013). Design of Financial Market Regulations against Large Price Fluctuations Using by Artificial Market Simulations [J]. Journal of Mathematical Finance, (3), 15-22.
25.
Mizuta, T., Kosugi, S., Kusumoto T, Matsumoto, W., Izumi, K., Yagi, I., & Yoshimura, S. (2015). Effects of Price Regulations and Dark Pools on Financial Market Stability: An Investigation by Multiagent Simulations [J]. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 1.
26.
Pang, S., & Wu, M. (2014). Comparative study on margin settings of the stock index futures: based on the Hill estimator and the Var-x estimation [J]. Journal of Management Science, 17(6), 84-96.
27.
Pati, P. C., & Rajib, P. (2011). Intraday return dynamics and volatility spillovers between NSE S&P CNX Nifty stock index and stock index futures [J]. Applied Economics Letters, 18(6), 567-574.
28.
Phylaktis, K., & Aristidou, A. (2010). Margin changes and futures trading activity: A new approach [J]. European Financial Management.
29.
Theissen, E. (2000). Market structure, informational efficiency and liquidity: An experimental comparison of auction and dealer markets [J]. Journal of Financial Markets, 3(4), 333–363.
30.
Wei, L, Xiong, X, & Che, H. (2012). Analysis of minimum quotation price unit’s effects on the liquidity and the volatility of the stock index futures market [J]. Modern Finance and Economics, (5), 45-51.
31.
Wei, L., Zhang, W., Xiong X., & Shi, L. (2015). Position limit for the CSI 300 stock index futures market [J]. Economic Systems.
32.
Wei, L., Zhang, W., Xiong, X., Zhao, Y. (2014). A Multi‐agent System for Policy Design of Tick Size in Stock Index Futures Markets [J]. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(4), 512-526.
33.
Xiong, X., Liu, J., Xu, H. (2014). Analysis of cross-time arbitraging effects on Chinese stock index futures market volatility [J]. System Engineering: Theory and Practice, 34(3), 623-630.
34.
Xu, H. C., Zhang, W.，Xiong, X., Zhou, W. X. (2014). An Agent-Based Computational Model for China’s Stock Market and Stock Index Futures Market [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.
35.
Xue, G., & Sriboonchitta, S. (2013). The optimal margin setting: The application of bivariate EVT method [J]. The Empirical Econometrics and Quantitative Economics Letters, 2(3), 56-74.
36.
Yagi, I., Mizuta, T., & Izumi, K. A. (2010). Study on the effectiveness of short-selling regulation using artificial markets [J]. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 7(1), 113-132.
37.
Yang, H., & Yan, H. (2008). Comparative empirical study on margin setting methods of index futures’ calendar spread trading [J]. Theory & Practice of System Engineering, 8(8), 132-138.
38.
Yeh, C. H., & Yang, C. Y. (2010). Examining the effectiveness of price limits in an artificial stock market [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(10), 2089-2108.
39.
Zhang, D., & Wei, X. (2013). Research on the effect of margin level to the stock index futures market: base on the perspectives of liquidity and volatility [J]. Management Review, 25(5), 35-41.
40.
Zhang, J., & Wang, X. (2014). Feasibility analysis of the T+0 trading system based on Chinese stock market [J]. Financial Times, (1), 247.
41.
Zuo, H., Liu, Z., & Zeng, H. (2012). High frequent data based research on the volatility spillover and the information delivery between the stock index futures market and the spot market [J]. Financial Research, (4), 140-154.
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
