RESEARCH PAPER
Classification of open mathematical problems and their role in academic achievement and motivation of students
 
More details
Hide details
1
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Nur-Sultan, KAZAKHSTAN
 
2
Vyatka State University, Kirov, RUSSIA
 
3
Ogarev Mordovia State University, Saransk, RUSSIA
 
4
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, RUSSIA
 
5
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
6
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
7
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
 
 
Publication date: 2022-07-25
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(8):em2143
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Problems of developing subject education and science have become more acute during different social changes. The most problematic is the teaching of exact disciplines, including mathematical disciplines (mathematics, algebra, geometry), which form knowledge for working in high-tech industries. It is worth noting that the methodology of teaching mathematics has accumulated a large unsystematized portfolio of new techniques and methods. Thus, open problems aimed at developing students’ creativity are used more actively in the lessons. Tasks that require students to use non-standard approaches to the solution affect academic success. But a teacher of mathematics needs to have a classification of problems in the educational process to choose tasks of an open type correctly. In this regard, the article deals with substantiating the classification of open problems for teaching mathematical disciplines and developing methodological guidelines for lessons that help increase learning motivation and academic achievement of students. The leading research methods are the following: observation of teachers’ methodological work, talks with teachers, analysis of methodological developments, educational documentation and teachers’ surveys. Statistical processing of the results using Wilcoxon W test. In 2020-2021 the authors carried out an experiment with 358 students from 16 classes. Based on its results, the authors of the article have identified a classification of open problems for teaching mathematical disciplines; developed and implemented methodological guidelines for lessons of mathematics that contribute to developing students’ creativity in the academic progress. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of using the selected classification of open problems for teaching mathematical disciplines. They concluded about the increase of group motivation among students and academic performance in mathematical disciplines. The practical use of the classification of open problems allows the teacher to differentiate educational problems in mathematics, taking into account the relationship between their logical structure and the level of ability achieved by the student to solve problems in mathematics. Methodological guidelines developed by the authors can be used to help increase the learning motivation and academic achievement of students while preparing for mathematics lessons.
 
REFERENCES (51)
1.
Ali, A., Ahmad, N., & Hussain, S. (2021). An experimental study of collaborative instructional strategy (CIS) for teaching mathematics at primary level in Pakistan. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 13(1), 94-105.
 
2.
Barana, A. (2021). From formulas to functions through geometry: A path to understanding algebraic computations. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(4), 1485-1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe....
 
3.
Basu, D., & Nguyen, H. B. (2021). Eating healthy: Understanding added sugar through proportional reasoning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12821. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
 
4.
Begishev, I., Khisamova, Z., & Vasyukov, V. (2021). Technological, ethical, environmental and legal aspects of robotics. E3S Web of Conferences, 244, 12028.
 
5.
Boaler, J., Dieckmann, J. A., LaMar, T., Leshin, M., Selbach-Allen, M., & Pérez-Núñez, G. (2021). The transformative impact of a mathematical mindset experience taught at scale. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.....
 
6.
Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2019). The influence of cognitive style on mathematical communication of prospective math teachers in solving problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
7.
Dong, Z., Tang, Y., & Cao, P. (2015). Research on teaching reform methods of data structure. Future Communication, Information and Computer Science - Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Communication, Information and Computer Science, FCICS 2014, 221-223. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18049....
 
8.
Duyen, N. T. H., & Loc, N. P. (2022). Developing primary students’ understanding of mathematics through mathematization: A case of teaching the multiplication of two natural numbers. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JE....
 
9.
Egara, F. O., Eseadi, C., & Nzeadibe, A. C. (2022). Effect of computer simulation on secondary school students’ interest in algebra. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
10.
ElSayary, A. (2021). Teaching and assessing creativity in STEAM education [Paper presentation]. In ICSIT 2021 - 12th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, Proceedings (pp. 126-131).
 
11.
Fetiskin, N. P., Kozlov, V. V., & Manuilov, G. M. (2014). Socio-psychological diagnostics of the development of personality and small groups. University education.
 
12.
Guerra, P., & Lim, W. (2017). Critical examination of ways students mirror the teacher's classroom practice: What does it mean to be successful at mathematics? Mathematics Enthusiast, 14(1-3), 175-206.
 
13.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
 
14.
Gülmez-Dağ, G., & Yildirim, A. (2016). A meta-synthesis study identifying the landscapes of pre- and in-service math teachers’ knowledge in the turkish context. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 31(2), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.....
 
15.
Hancock, E., & Karakok, G. (2021). Supporting the development of process-focused metacognition during problem-solving. PRIMUS, 31(8), 837-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/105119....
 
16.
Hawes, Z., Merkley, R., Stager, C. L., & Ansari, D. (2021). Integrating numerical cognition research and mathematics education to strengthen the teaching and learning of early number. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 1073-1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.1....
 
17.
Husain, S. A., Manan, N. A. E. M., & Goergeshua, V. (2022). Determining suitable creative and innovative teaching methods for secondary school mathematics during COVID-19 pandemic. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 381, 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
18.
Hwang, J., & Ham, Y. (2021). Relationship between mathematical literacy and opportunity to learn with different types of mathematical tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.1....
 
19.
Japelj Pavešić, B., Radović, M., & Brese, F. (2022). Students’ interests, motivation, and self-beliefs. IEA Research for Education (A Series of In-depth Analyses Based on Data of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)), 13, 65-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
20.
Jere, N. R., Jona, W., & Lukose, J. M. (2019). Effectiveness of using WhatsApp for grade 12 learners in teaching mathematics in South Africa. Paper presented at the 2019 IST-Africa Week Conference, IST-Africa 2019. https://doi.org/10.23919/ISTAF....
 
21.
Kalimullin, A. M., & Utemov, V. V. (2017). Open type tasks as a tool for developing creativity in secondary school students. Interchange, 48(2), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780....
 
22.
Klein, S., & Leikin, R. (2020). Opening mathematical problems for posing open mathematical tasks: what do teachers do and feel? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
23.
Kong, S. F., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2022). Can a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) approach enhance students’ mathematics performance? Sustainability, 14(1), 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1401....
 
24.
Kostyuk, G. S., Ball, G. A., & Mashbits, E. I. (1973). On the task approach to the study of educational activity. Second Prague Conference "Psychology of human learning and problem solving". Summary.
 
25.
Ladanov, I. D. (2004). Practical management. Psychothenics of management and self-training. Corporate strategies.
 
26.
Leikin, R., & Kawass, S. (2005). Planning teaching an unfamiliar mathematics problem: The role of teachers' experience in solving the problem and watching pupils solving it. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 253-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
27.
Lestari, N. D. S., Juniati, D., & Suwarsono, S. (2018). Exploring the knowledge of content and teaching (KCT) of prospective math teacher in planning mathematical literacy teaching. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
28.
Liñán-García, M. M., Muñoz-Catalán, M. C., Contreras, L. C., & Barrera-Castarnado, V. J. (2021). Specialised knowledge for teaching geometry in a primary education class: Analysis from the knowledge mobilized by a teacher and the knowledge evoked in the researcher. Mathematics, 9(21), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/math92....
 
29.
Litster, K., Macdonald, B. L., & Shumway, J. F. (2020). Experiencing active mathematics learning: Meeting the expectations for teaching and learning in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Enthusiast, 17(2-3), 615-640. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-....
 
30.
Lukac, S., & Sekerak, J. (2017). The use of the system geogebra for graphical interpretation of functional dependencies in mathematics teaching [Paper presentation]. In ICETA 2017 - 15th IEEE International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications, 2805. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.....
 
31.
Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The Role of Mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM, 51(6), 869-884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
32.
Mahmud, M. S., Pa, W. A. M. W., Zainal, M. S., & Drus, N. F. M. (2021). Improving students' critical thinking through oral questioning in mathematics teaching. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(11), 407-421. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlte....
 
33.
Maurer, J., Becker, A., Hilkenmeier, J., & Daseking, M. (2021). Experiences and perceived self-efficacy in distance learning among teachers of students with special educational needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
 
34.
McLure, F. I., Fraser, B. J., & Koul, R. B. (2022). Structural relationships between classroom emotional climate, teacher–student interpersonal relationships and students’ attitudes to STEM. Social Psychology of Education, 25(2), 625-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218....
 
35.
Mohd, N., & Tengku Mahmood, T. F. P. (2011). The effects of attitude towards problem solving in mathematics achievements. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1857-1862.
 
36.
Ozturk, M. (2021). Cognitive and metacognitive skills performed by math teachers in the proving process of number theory. Athens Journal of Education, 8(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.8....
 
37.
Platonova, R. I., Vasyukov, V. F., Vorozhikhin, V. V., Akhamadieva, R. S., Donskova, L. A., & Zdanovskaya, L. (2021). Metaphorical cards as innovative educational technology for students' social intelligence developing. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(4), 1926-1935. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.....
 
38.
Przybylska, I. (2014). Emotional aspects of school educationcurricula and relationship context. Us-China Educational Review B, 4(7), 431-442.
 
39.
Putra, J. D., Suryadi, D., & Juandi, D. (2018). Mathematical abstraction ability of prospective math teacher students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132(1), 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
40.
Rose, N., Gunadi, F., Rosyadi, Nandang, & Sudirman. (2021). Comic mathematics: A bridge to understanding the concept of social arithmetic for secondary school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1783(1), 012104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
41.
Sarifuddin, M., Isnarto, I., & Wiyanto, W. (2021). Students ’ Critical Thinking Ability Reviewed Learning Styles in Learning with SCAMPER Method the Assisted by E-Module. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 10(2), 188-194.
 
42.
Shaidullina, A. R., Zakirova, V. G., Kashurnikov, S. N., Arestova, E. N., Shmidt, A. N. & Kovaleva, N. I. (2018). Students training for innovative entrepreneurial activity: social responsibility competences. ESPACIOS, 39(02), 15-26.
 
43.
Shang, C., Lin, E., & Juan, C. (2011). The discussion information computer technology integrates fitness of 6-7th grade mathematics teaching [Paper presentation]. In 2011 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering, ICECE 2011 – Proceedings (pp. 6884-6888). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECEN....
 
44.
The jamovi project. (2022). jamovi (Version 2.3.12). https://www.jamovi.org/.
 
45.
Tian, H. (2021). Comparative and development of network information teaching and traditional teaching methods [Paper presentation]. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 1289-1293). https://doi.org/10.1145/348263....
 
46.
Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Quoc, N. V. A. (2021). The improvement of 10th students' mathematical communication skills through learning ellipse topics. Heliyon, 7(11), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli....
 
47.
Utemov, V. V., & Masalimova, A. R. (2017). Differentiation of creative mathematical problems for primary school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4351-4362. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
48.
Wahyudi, I., & Marsyidin, S. (2019). The effect of open ended approaches and learning motivation on mathematical learning outcomes in Class V. International Journal of Educational Dynamics, 1(2), 211-217. http://ijeds.ppj.unp.ac.id/ind....
 
49.
Wang, L., & Feng, C. (2009). The high school maths teachers' specialism's impact of educational background. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, ETCS 2009, 3, 930-933. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCS.2....
 
50.
Yang, P., Li, Z., Guo, H., Tang, Y., & Wang, J. (2011). Integrative application of modern teaching methods in teaching of engineering geophysical exploration. Advanced Materials Research, 271-273, 1425-1429. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.sc....
 
51.
Zuzovsky, R. (2013). What works where? the relationship between instructional variables and schools' mean scores in mathematics and science in low-, medium-, and high-achieving countries. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 1(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-0....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top