RESEARCH PAPER
Comparative Advantages between China and Britain in the Construction of Higher Educational Security System
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Humanities and Law, Harbin University, Harbin, 150080, CHINA
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-10-14
 
 
Publication date: 2017-10-14
 
 
Corresponding author
Haohua Zhao   

College of Humanities and Law, Harbin University, Harbin, 150080, China, +86 13936541585
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(10):6939-6944
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
It is a common sense in the field of world educational theory that the development of higher education is promoted and the participation of talents into practice of training for technical education is encouraged. All countries have taken active measures to encourage and promote the development of higher education in their own countries. With deepening of reform and opening up, talent shortage has become the bottleneck of social and economic development in China’s higher education. In order to meet the needs of professional and technical talents in economic development, China’s vocational higher education has established the goal of training talents to meet the needs of social and economic development. In educational practice, talent training is related to job gap in social technology. Under the guidance of this goal, the batch of market-oriented training model for qualified personnel has become the mainstream. As a result, China’s higher educational system can alleviate the “thirst for talent” in the market and provide a strong support for sustained and healthy development of economy. The mode of Chinese higher educational system and “dual system” of British educational model constitute a different form of personnel training. The UK higher education pays more attention to ability training, which has significant tendency. It is beneficial to individual development, while Chinese higher educational system supported by university system will not only offer the talents systematic knowledge, but also timely adjust the teaching content according to the change of market demand and enhance the social applicability of higher education. In the reform of optimizing Chinese higher educational system, we should actively refer to experiences of higher education in Britain to build higher educational system with Chinese characteristics: strengthening basic construction of law system and top-level construction of vocational education; carrying out quality certification and encouraging enterprises to participate in practice of vocational education system; regulating the connotative construction of contents and model in higher education to improve the quality of vocational education.
 
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Alas, R., & Aarna, O. (2015). The Transition from the Soviet Higher Education System to the European Higher Education Area: The Case of Estonia. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 34, 31-40.
 
2.
Gao, G., & Ma, Y. N. (2016). Influence of family environmental factors on the mental health of uyghur students. School health in China, 37, 1713-1715.
 
3.
Hou, Y.C., Ince, M., Tsai, S., Chiang, C. L. (2015). Quality assurance of quality assurance agencies from an Asian perspective: regulation, autonomy and accountability. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 95-106.
 
4.
Li, S. (2017). Analysis and design of online learning activities of education. Research of heilongjiang high education, 3, 85-88.
 
5.
Liang, C. M., & Yu, L. M. (2017). Call for Reason: Research on the Lack of PE Curriculum and Teaching Rationality and Its. Journal of Nanjing Sport Institute (Social Science), 30, 113-117.
 
6.
Ma, L., Wang, L. X., Shen, X. Y., et al. (2016). Air quality in winter dormitory of a university in Beijing. School health in China, 37, 470-472.
 
7.
Maassen, P. A. M., & Potman, H. P. (2017). Strategic Decision Making in Higher Education: An Analysis of the New Planning System in Dutch Higher Education. Higher Education, 20, 393-410.
 
8.
Price, S. B. M. (2015). External examining: fit for purpose? Studies in Higher Education, 40, 195-211.
 
9.
Serrano, G., Llamazares, F., & Otamendi, F. (2015). Measurement and Sustainability of the Qualifications Frameworks in the European Higher Education Area through an Employment Survey on Access to the Labour Market. Sustainability, 7, 13777-13812.
 
10.
Shen, W. Y. (2016). Advanced education advantage resources to coordinate development concept and carry out research. Research of heilongjiang high education, 30, 28-30.
 
11.
Sun, L. Y. (2015). The health literacy status and education demand analysis of college students in zhengzhou university. School health in China, 36, 773-776.
 
12.
Wang, Y. X., Fu, R., & Yi, X. (2015). Analysis of the results of college entrance examination for female college students in Beijing from 2010 to 2014. School health in China, 36, 613-614.
 
13.
Yeap, J. A. L., Ramayah, T., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2016). Factors propelling the adoption of m-learning among students in higher education. Electronic Markets, 26, 1-16.
 
14.
Zhan, W. L. (2016). Higher education entrepreneurship curriculum system social professional application direction research. Research of heilongjiang high education, 20, 103-105.
 
15.
Zhang, G. Y. (2015). Construction of high education quality assurance mechanism under collaborative innovation vision. Research of heilongjiang high education, 12, 55-57.
 
16.
Zhang, N. X., Zhang, R. S., Cui, Q., et al. (2015). The localization exploration and practice of “dual system” talent cultivation mode. Chinese professional technology education, 11, 16-20.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top