RESEARCH PAPER
Descriptors Derived From Feedback on Teaching Mathematics in School
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Psychology and Education, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
 
 
Publication date: 2021-08-24
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(10):em2019
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this article was to identify the mechanism of bilateral feedback on Mathematics homework and to determine its impact on the success of schoolchildren learning. The following were used as the main research methods: the study and generalization of pedagogical experience which helped to consider possible ways of providing feedback on homework in Mathematics; the analysis of student artefacts with subsequent statistical processing. The latter made it possible to study the dynamics of students’ knowledge of Mathematics and to judge the effectiveness of feedback on homework. The article reveals possible ways to provide feedback on homework in Mathematics deploying digital technologies; a scheme for meaningful feedback and ensuring its bilateral nature has been developed; the influence of the feedback in question on learning success was calculated. The implications of the study involve the fact that the developed didactic conditions ensure a bilateral nature of feedback during self-directed learning of Mathematics using digital technologies. This, in turn, contributes to the efficiency of the educational process and the provision of visible learning.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Azizi, M., Kralik, R., Petrikovicova, L., & Tkáčova, H. (2020). A comparative study of the effects of self-assessment and peer feedback on literature students’ oral production. Science for Education Today, 10(5), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-....
 
2.
Baisalbaeva, M. K., & Syzdykova, G. S. (2019). Principles of constructive feedback in research practice of an international baccalaureate teacher. Young Scientist, 6, 198-201.
 
3.
Begishev, I., Khisamova, Z., & Vasyukov, V. (2021). From robotics technology to environmental crimes involving robots. E3S Web of Conferences, 244, 12029. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scon....
 
4.
Federal State Educational Standard for Compulsory Education. (2010). Garant: Information and legal support. https://base.garant.ru/5517050....
 
5.
Feoktistov, I. E. (2009). Algebra. 7th grade. Didactic materials. Guidelines. Mnemosina.
 
6.
Gin, A. A. (2016). Methods of pedagogical technique: freedom of choice, openness, activity, feedback, ideality: A manual for a teacher. VITA-PRESS.
 
7.
Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning. Publishing house “National Education”. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
8.
Hu, B. Y., Li, Y. H., Zhang, X., Roberts, S. K., & Vitiello, G. (2021). The quality of teacher feedback matters: Examining Chinese teachers’ use of feedback strategies in preschool math lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate....
 
9.
Ibragimov, G. I. (2017). Purpose as a pedagogical category. In Innovation in vocational and vocational teacher education (pp. 68-72).
 
10.
Klyueva, T. N., & Gensetskaya, Yu. V. (2017). Formation of conscious self-regulation of adolescents in educational activities: guidelines. GBU DPO “Regional Sociopsychological Center”.
 
11.
Korenev, A. A. (2018). Feedback in teaching and pedagogical communication. Rhema. Rem, 2, 112-127.
 
12.
Korenev, A. A. (2020). How to give effective feedback? https://teacher.yandex.ru/post....
 
13.
Korotkova, A. Yu., & Litvinovskaya, N. Yu. (2019). Feedback in the classroom as an element of the formative assessment system. Implementation of educational and educational functions of a modern elementary school: Collection of articles based on the materials of the X All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 122-126). Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University”.
 
14.
Larionova, A. A., Zaitseva, N. A., Anoshina, Y. F., Gaidarenko, L. V., & Ostroukhov, V. M. (2018). The modern paradigm of transforming the vocational education system. Astra Salvensis, 6, 436-448.
 
15.
Lazarev, V. S. (2016). On the problem of ensuring the validity of a pedagogical experiment. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Education, 2, 50-64.
 
16.
Monteiro, V., Mata, L., Santos, N., Sanches, C., & Gomes, M. (2019). Classroom talk: The ubiquity of feedback. Frontiers in Education, 4, 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.....
 
17.
Myshkovskaya, A. P. (2016). Use of effective feedback techniques, mutual control and mutual evaluation in physics lessons. https://multiurok.ru/blog/ispo....
 
18.
Razumovskaya, M., Zaitseva, N. A., Larionova, A. A., Chudnovskiy, A. D., & Breusova, E. A. (2018). Prospects for applying various forms of organizational integration to improve the quality of education. Astra Salvensis, 6, 348-362.
 
19.
Roslan, R., Panjang, S. M., Yusof, N., & Shahrill, M. (2018). Teacher’s feedback in teaching science in a bilingual Bruneian primary classroom. On the Horizon. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09....
 
20.
Salomasov, V. (2011). Principles of effective feedback. https://orator.biz/library/com....
 
21.
Wang, W., & Li, S. (2021). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in American ESL and Chinese EFL classrooms: A comparative study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/079083....
 
22.
Zaitseva, N. A., Larionova, A. A., Filatov, V. V., Rodina, E. E., Zhenzhebir, V. N., Povorina, E. V., & Palastina, I. P. (2018). Natural-resource potential management of region’s territorial ecosystems. Ekoloji, 27(106), 495-502.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top