RESEARCH PAPER
Formation of Computational Thinking Skills Using Computer Games in Teaching Mathematics
 
More details
Hide details
1
Vyatka State University, 610000, Moskovskaya Street 36, Kirov, RUSSIA
 
2
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, 420008, Kremlevskaya Street 18, Kazan, RUSSIA
 
3
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991, Trubetskaya Street 8, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
4
Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, 125130, Narvskaya Street 15a, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
5
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198, Miklukho-Maklaya Street 6, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
6
Kazan State Power Engineering University, 420066, Krasnoselskaya Street 51, Kazan, RUSSIA
 
 
Publication date: 2021-08-24
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(10):em2012
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The research is relevant as educational computer games are included in students’ mathematical activity and form additional opportunities to improve the quality of teaching mathematics in a digital school, to support the formation of the demanded professional competence - computational thinking. To form the appropriate skills that determine the essence of special computational thinking, the authors propose to include game educational spaces based on digital gamification resources into students’ mathematical activities. The research aims to resolve the contradiction between requirements of the modern economy for specialists’ high level of computational thinking and an insufficiently developed methodological base for training graduates that meets these requirements. The purpose of this research is to study the features of using gamification technologies in teaching mathematics to form the skills and abilities that make up the essence of computational thinking. The article describes directions of educational and cognitive mathematical activity based on the principles of gamification. The authors clarify the concept of “computational thinking”, which includes a system of actions for activating patterns, connections between them from human memory, and compile an effective algorithm for solving them: to obtain relevant information on advanced technological developments; to state the problem and model; to use a software product with mathematical content.
 
REFERENCES (67)
1.
Alexandrov, D., Ivaniushina, V., & Simanovsky, D. (2017). Online educational resources for schoolchildren and the digital divide. Educational Studies Moscow, 3, 183-201. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-....
 
2.
Arefeva, E. V., Muraveva, E. V., & Valiullin, B. M. (2021) Application of mathematical modeling in forecasting the spread of infection. Vestnik NCBŽD, 2(48), 82-92.
 
3.
Barbieri, G. G., Barbieri, R., & Capone, R. (2021). Serious games in high school mathematics lessons: An embedded case study in Europe. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(5), em1963. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
4.
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1145/192988....
 
5.
Bayanova, A. R., Kuznetsov, V. V., Merculova, L. V., Gorbunova, L. N., Pervozvanskaya, O. A., Shalamova, O. O., & Vorobyova, C. I. (2019). Student performance interrelation with gadget use at lessons. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 7(3), 432-437. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.0....
 
6.
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., & Earp, J. (2018). The Nordic approach to introducing computational thinking and programming in compulsory education. Report prepared for the Nordic@BETT2018 Steering. https://doi.org/10.17471/54007.
 
7.
Borissova, D., Keremedchiev, D., & Tuparov, G. (2000). Multi-criteria model for questions selection in generating e-education tests involving gamification. TEM Journal, 9(2), 779-785. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM92....
 
8.
Bovermann, K., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2020). Towards a motivational design? Connecting gamification user types and online learning activities. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039....
 
9.
Buteau, C., Sacristán, A. I., & Muller, E. (2019). Roles and demands in constructionist teaching of computational thinking in university mathematics. Constructivist Foundations, 14(3), 294-309.
 
10.
Catarino, P., Vasco, P., Lopes, J., Silva, H., & Morais, E. (2019). Cooperative learning on promoting creative thinking and mathematical creativity in higher education. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educacion, 17(3), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice....
 
11.
Chevalier, M., Giang, C., Piatti, A., & Mondada, F. (2020). Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: A model for creative computational problem solving. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
 
12.
Fazleeva, E. V., Fazleev, A. N., Valeeva, A. A., & Merkulov, A. N. (2021). Influence of physical education on the dynamics of psychophyiological adaptation indicators during distance learning. Vestnik NCBŽD, 1(47), 45-52.
 
13.
Finkel, A. (2017). Cognitive analysis, digital psychology and training of university teachers. Pratiques Psychologiques, 23(3), 303-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps....
 
14.
Galimova, E., Konysheva, A., Kalugina, O., & Sizova, Z. (2019). Digital educational footprint as a way to evaluate the results of students’ learning and cognitive activity in the process of teaching mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8), em1732. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
15.
Galiullina, E. R. (2018). Mastering the methods of generating ideas as a way to develop creativity. Vestnik NCBŽD, 1(35), 12-15.
 
16.
Gault, F. (2019). User innovation in the digital economy. Foresight and STI Governance, 13(3), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-....
 
17.
Ghazali, E. M., Mutum, D. S., & Woon, M. Y. (2019). Multiple sequential mediation in an extended uses and gratifications model of augmented reality game Pokémon Go. Internet Research, 29(3), 504-528. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-1....
 
18.
Gruzdev, M. V., Kuznetsova, I. V., Tarkhanova, I. Yu., & Kazakova, E. I. (2018). University graduates’ soft skills: The employers’ opinion. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(4), 690-698. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced....
 
19.
Hamada, M., & Hasan, M. (2017). An interactive learning environment for information and communication theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
20.
Helmlinger, B., Sommer, M., Feldhammer-Kahr, M., Wood, G., Arendasy, M. E., & Kober, S. E. (2020). Programming experience associated with neural efficiency during figural reasoning. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 13351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
 
21.
Hotyat, F. (1952). The weakness in mathematical thinking in adolescents. Enfance; Psychologie, Pédagogie, Neuropsychiatrie, Sociologie, 5(4), 273-300. https://doi.org/10.3406/enfan.....
 
22.
Hsu, Y. C., Irie, N. R. & Ching, Y. H. (2019). Computational Thinking Educational Policy Initiatives (CTEPI) across the Globe. TechTrends, 63, 260-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528....
 
23.
Ilomäki, L., & Lakkala, M. (2018). Digital technology and practices for school improvement: innovative digital school model. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13, 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039....
 
24.
Janelli, M. (2018). E-learning in theory, practice, and research. Educational Studies Moscow, 4, 81-98. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-....
 
25.
Karakozov, S. D., & Ryzhova, N. I. (2019). Information and education systems in the context of digitalization of education. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 12(9), 1635-1647. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-....
 
26.
Karavaev, N. L., & Soboleva, Е. V. (2017). Analysis of software services and platforms that have the potential to gamify learning. Scientific and Methodological Electronic Journal “Concept”, 8, 461-473. http://doi.org/10.24422/mcito.....
 
27.
Khenner, E. K. (2016). Computational thinking. The Education and Science Journal, 2, 18-33. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-....
 
28.
Kholodnaya, M. A., & Gelfman, E. G. (2016). Development-focused educational texts as a basis for learners’ intellectual development in studying mathematics (DET technology). Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(3), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2....
 
29.
Khutorskoy, A. V. (2017). Methodological basis for the use of competence-based approach to the design of education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 12(218), 85-91. https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/art....
 
30.
Klunnikova, М. М. (2019). The methods of developing computational thinking of students while studying the course “Numerical methods” based on blended learning. Computer Science and Education, 6, 34-41. https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-....
 
31.
Kuzminov, Y., Sorokin, P., & Froumin, I. (2019). Generic and specific skills as components of human capital: New challenges for education theory and practice. Foresight and STI Governance, 13(2), 19-41. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-....
 
32.
Legaki, N., Xi, N., Hamari, J., Karpouzis, K., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2020). The effect of challenge-based gamification on learning: An experiment in the context of statistics education. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 144, 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhc....
 
33.
Leontiev, D. A., Lebedeva, A. A., & Kostenko, V. Yu. (2017). Pathways of personality development: following Lev Vygotsky’s guidelines. Voprosi obrazovania, 2, 98-112. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-....
 
34.
Li, N., Mok, I. A. C., & Cao, Y. (2019). The evolution of mathematical thinking in chinese mathematics education. Mathematics, 7(3), 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/m-ath7....
 
35.
Mora-Luis, C. E., & Martin-Gutierrez, J. (2020). The change of educational processes, learning and teaching in engineering education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3), em1828. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
36.
More, M. (2018). Mathematics and engineering in real life through mathematical competitions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(2), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
37.
Nizamutdinova, S. M., Lisitzina, T. B., Vorobyev, V. K., Prokopyev, A. I., Tararina, L. I., & Sayfutdinova, G. B. (2019). Student views on downshifter lifestyle in urban environments. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 1196-1201.
 
38.
Paiva, J. C., Leal, J. P., & Queirós, R. (2020). Fostering programming practice through games. Information (Switzerland), 11(11), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11....
 
39.
Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
 
40.
Papert, S. (1996). An Exploration in the Space of Mathematics Educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0019....
 
41.
Paterson, R. E. (2017). Intuitive cognition and models of human–automaton interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59(1), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872....
 
42.
Perminov, E. A., Gadjiev, D. D., & Abdurazakov, M. M. (2019). About relevance of fundamentalisation of mathematical training of students of the pedagogical directions during the digital era. Obrazovanie i Nauka, 21(5), 86-111. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-....
 
43.
Petrova, S. O. (2021). Ethical behaviour of a teacher and students in the distance learning environment. Vestnik NCBŽD, 1(47), 17-23.
 
44.
Piralova, O. F., Gerasimenko, S. A., Kuznetsov, V. V., Popova, O. V., Subbotin, G. V., Kolomyts, O. G., & Mashkin, N. A. (2020). Gaming industry trends in new generation specialist training in university environment. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 8(3), 1132-1135.
 
45.
Ponomarev, A., & Dezhina, I. (2016). Approaches to the formulation of Russia’s technological priorities. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-....
 
46.
Radović, S., Marić, M., & Passey, D. (2019). Technology enhancing mathematics learning behaviours: Shifting learning goals from “producing the right answer” to “understanding how to address current and future mathematical challenges”. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
47.
Sabirova, E., Zakirova, V., Valeeva, R. A., & Mena, J. (2019). Educational platforms for children in teaching mathematics: Russian Case. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 594-599. https://doi.org/10.1145/336278....
 
48.
Sayed, F. (2017). ICT, mathematics and critical thinking. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 383-385.
 
49.
Semenykhina, O. V., & Rudenko, Y. О. (2018) Problems of educating to programming of students and way of their overcoming. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 66(4), 54-64. http://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v....
 
50.
Sirazetdinov, R. T. (2018). Mathematical models of risk in emergency situations. Vestnik NCBŽD, 4(38), 129-134.
 
51.
Skurikhina, J. A., Valeeva, R. A., Khodakova, N. P., & Maystrovich, E. V. (2018). Forming research competence and engineering thinking of school students by means of educational robotics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1639. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
52.
Smirnov, E. I., Zykova, T. V., & Tikhomirov, S. A. (2019). The management of school mathematical education with synergistic effect. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 37(1), 190-202. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2....
 
53.
Soboleva, E. V., & Perevozchikova, M. S. (2019). Features of training future teachers to develop and use mobile gaming applications with educational content. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania – Perspectives of Science and Education, 41(5), 428-440. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2....
 
54.
Soboleva, E. V., Suvorova, T. N., Zenkina, S. V., & Gerasimova, E. K. (2020). The development of critical thinking through the involvement of pupils in competitive robotics (from work experience). Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania – Perspectives of Science and Education, 44(2), 268-284. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2....
 
55.
Solodikhina, M. V., & Solodikhina, A. A. (2019). Development of critical thinking of master’s degree students using stem cases. Obrazovanie i Nauka, 21(3), 125-153. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-....
 
56.
Urvanova, N. А. (2018). Model of development of mathematical thinking of students on the lessons of the disciplines of mathematical and natural science cycle. Innovative Development of Professional Education, 4(20), 39-45.
 
57.
Usol’tsev, A. P., & Antipova, E. P. (2019). Innovative activity of teachers—Myth or reality? The Education and Science Journal, 21(5), 9-41. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-....
 
58.
Valeeva, R. A. & Bushmeleva, N. A. (2016). Forming analytical competency of higher school students. Mathematics Education, 11(8), 3137-3148.
 
59.
Valeeva, R. A., & Shakirova, K. B. (2015). Development of the future mathematics teachers’ constructive skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese....
 
60.
Varshavskaya, E., & Kotyrlo, E. S. (2019). Graduates in Engineering and Economics: Between Demand and Supply. Educational Studies Moscow, 2, 98-128. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-....
 
61.
Wing, J. M. (2017). Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-....
 
62.
Yung, O. C., Junaini, S. N., Kamal, A. A., & Md Ibharim, L. F. (2020). I slash 100%: Gamification of mathematics with hybrid QR-based card game. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 20(3), 1453-1459. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeec....
 
63.
Yurkin, M. A., Shimitilo, V. L., Usacheva, T. V., & Bataeva, K. S. (2020). Possible approaches to flood forecasting in information systems of EMERCOM of Russia with the use of mathematical models. Vestnik NCBŽD, 1(43), 131-139.
 
64.
Záhorec, J., Hašková, A., & Munk, M. (2010). Impact of Electronic Teaching Materials on Process of Education Results of an Experiment. Informatics in Education, 9(2), 261-281. https://doi.org/10.15388/infed....
 
65.
Zaripova, I. M., Shaidullina, A. R., Upshinskaya, A. E., Sayfutdinova, G. B., & Drovnikov, A. S. (2014). Modeling of petroleum engineers design-technological competence forming in physical-mathematical disciplines studying process. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(7), 1049-1053. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp....
 
66.
Zeynivandnezhad, F., & Bates, R. (2018). Explicating mathematical thinking in differential equations using a computer algebra system. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(5), 680-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
67.
Zharko, L. N. (2020). Case-study as an innovative pedagogical technology in teaching activities of lecturer of additional professional education. Vestnik NCBŽD, 2(44), 49-56.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top