RESEARCH PAPER
High School Students’ Questions About Science and Religion in School Debates with Scientists
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
CIIE - Centre for Research and Intervention in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, PORTUGAL
 
2
CIQUP, Science Teaching Unit, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, PORTUGAL
 
3
Department of Education and Distance Education, Open University, Lisbon, PORTUGAL
 
 
Publication date: 2021-04-30
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(6):em1967
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The paper describes an analysis of the questions posed by high school students regarding relationships between science and religion in a series of debates with scientists in public high schools of the northern part of Portugal. The exploratory interpretation of 171 collected anonymous written questions allowed for the detection of fragilities in the students’ ideas about the nature of science and the nature of religion, connected with a trend to reject religion using scientism arguments. The findings reinforce a need of revising the fragmented teaching of nature of science and its connections with religion towards a more contextualized approach of diversified episodes of these social endeavours, anchored in life’s ‘big questions’ that allow students to make cross-disciplinary connections. Our analysis also supports the need for more research on students’ questions rather than on students’ answers in more common research methodologies conducted to inform the development of a more meaningful curriculum.
 
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Abreu, H. (2011). Evolução: O seu ensino em Portugal [Evolution: Its teaching in Portugal]. Açoreana, 7, 369-375.
 
2.
Baram‐Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Characterizing children’s spontaneous interests in science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 803-826. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
3.
Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2006). Using questions sent to an Ask-A-Scientist site to identify children’s interests in science. Science Education, 90(6), 1050-1072. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
 
4.
Bardin, L. (2006/1977). Análise de conteúdo [Content analysis]. Edições 70.
 
5.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
 
6.
Billingsley, B., & Hardman, M. (2017). Epistemic insight: Teaching and learning about the nature of science in real-world and multidisciplinary arenas. School Science Review, 365, 57-58.
 
7.
Billingsley, B., Brock, R., Taber, K., & Riga, F. (2016). How students view the boundaries between their science and religious education concerning the origins of life and the universe. Science Education, 100(3), 459-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
 
8.
Billingsley, B., Taber, K., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2013). Secondary school students’ epistemic insight into the relationships between science and religion: A preliminary enquiry. Research in Science Education, 43, 1715-1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
9.
Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 865-883. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20....
 
10.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/030572....
 
11.
Eriksson, K. (2000). In search of the meaning of life: A study of the ideas of senior compulsory school pupils on life and its meaning in an experiential learning context. British Journal of Religious Education, 22(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/014162....
 
12.
France, B., & Bay, J. L. (2010). Questions students ask: Bridging the gap between scientists and students in a research institute classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
13.
Gibbons, M., Nowotny, H., & Scott, S. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and contemporary societies. Sage Publications.
 
14.
Goodson, I. F. (2005). Learning curriculum, and life politics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
15.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.
 
16.
Kohut, M. (2018). Changing minds or rhetoric? How students use their many natures of science to talk about evolution. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14, 839-862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422....
 
17.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (Vol. 1, pp. 831-880). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
18.
Mansour, N. (2015). Science teachers’ views and stereotypes of religion, scientists and scientific research: A call for scientist-science teacher partnerships to promote inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1767-1794. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
19.
Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmst....
 
20.
Paiva J., Morais C., & Moreira L. (2019). If neither from evolution nor from the bible, where does tension between science and religion come from? Insights from a survey with high school students in a Roman Catholic society. In B. Billingsley, K. Chappell, & M. Reiss (Eds.), Science and religion in education: Contemporary trends and issues in science education (Vol. 48). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
21.
Paiva, J., Morais, C., & Moreira, L. (2016). Attitudes towards science and religion: Insights from a questionnaire validation with secondary education students. In Pixel (Ed.), International conference new perspectives in science education: Conference proceedings (pp. 430-434). libreriauniversitaria.it.
 
22.
Paiva, J., Moreira, J., Morais, C., & Moreira, L. (2016). Windows for science-religion dialogue in Portuguese school education. https://crc.up.pt/2018/05/10/w....
 
23.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods - Integrating Theory and Practice (4th Ed.). SAGE.
 
24.
Reiss, M. J. (2010). Science and religion: Implications for science educators. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422....
 
25.
Santos, B. S. (1989). Um discurso sobre as ciências [A discourse about sciences]. Afrontamento.
 
26.
Starr, L. J. (2010). Does anyone really know anything? An exploration of constructivist meaning and identity in the tension between scientific and religious knowledge. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422....
 
27.
Tang, K.-S., & Yang, X. (2017). Student agency in negotiating the relationship between science and religion. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 1301-1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
28.
Yasri, P., & Mancy, R. (2014). Understanding student approaches to learning evolution in the context of their perceptions of the relationship between science and religion. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top