RESEARCH PAPER
How to Design Teaching Materials to Improve the Ability of Mathematical Reflective Thinking of Senior High School Students in Indonesia?
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Siliwangi, INDONESIA
 
2
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, INDONESIA
 
 
Online publication date: 2019-08-29
 
 
Publication date: 2019-08-29
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2019;15(12):em1790
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This research is a research and development which produces teaching materials. The research method consists of stages, namely: an introduction (literature study, observation, and interviews), product development of teaching materials, test by a team of experts, and restricted trial to the eleventh-grade students of senior high school in Cimahi, West Java, Indonesia. It was concluded that the teaching materials through scientific approach with what if not strategy load some activities including observing, trying, reasoning, asking, and concluding. The activities of asking using what if not strategy involve changing the data, adding the data, changing the data with the same question, and changing the question to the same data. In the teaching materials, it is presented some contextual problems in accordance with the experience of students. The design of teaching materials consists of three parts, namely: the beginning involves cover, preface, and table of contents; the content section: containing the title of the chapter dealing with the enumeration rules as a representation of the contents of the chapter; and closing: as a reflection and evaluation of the material presented on teaching materials for the next revision. Teaching materials can enhance the ability of reflective thinking of the students with medium criteria.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Black, S. (2005). Teaching Students to Think Critically. The Education Digest, 70(6), 42-47.
 
2.
Brown, S. I., & Walter, I. (2005). The Art of Problem Posing (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/978141....
 
3.
Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher Perceptions of Critical Thinking Among Students and its Influence on Higher Education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 1996-204.
 
4.
Choy, S. C., & Oo, P. S. (2012). Reflective Thinking and Teaching Practise: A Precursor for Incorporating Critical Thinking into the Classroom? International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 167-182.
 
5.
Dewey, J. (1993). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process (2nd ed.). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.
 
6.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/089236....
 
7.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analysing Change/Gain Scores. Woodland Hills, USA: Department of Physics, Indiana University.
 
8.
Haryadi, R., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. (2014). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching (RT) dan Problem Based Learning (PBL) pada Materi Peluang Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Belajar Siswa Kelas XI SMA/MA Negeri di Kabupaten Ketapang Provinsi Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika UNS, 2(8), 885-898.
 
9.
Hendriana, H. (2017). Teachers’ Hard and Soft Skills in Innovative Teaching of Mathematics. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(2), 145-150.
 
10.
Herman, T. (2007). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Matematika Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Educationist, 1(1), 47-56.
 
11.
Hmelo, C. E., & Ferrari, M. (1997). The Problem-Based Learning Tutorial: Cultivating Higher Order Thinking Skills. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20(4), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235....
 
12.
Hu, Y., Xing, J., & Tu, L. (2018). The Effect of a Problem-oriented Teaching Method on University Mathematics Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1695-1703. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
13.
Kemdikbud. (2013). Pendekatan Scientific (Ilmiah) dalam Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Pusbagprodik.
 
14.
Kurniawati, L., Kusumah, Y. S., Sumarmo, U., & Sabandar, J. (2014). Enhancing Students’ Mathematical Intuitive-Reflective Thinking Ability through Problem-Based Learning with Hypnoteaching Method. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(36), 130-135.
 
15.
Moss, J. (2010). A Partnership in Induction and Mentoring: Noticing How we Improve Our Practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.....
 
16.
Mursidi, I. R., & Muhsetyo, G. (2012). Penggunaan Media Cat Air dalam Memahamkan Materi Permutasi dan Kombinasi Pada Siswa Kelas XI SMAK Yos Sudarso Kapanjen dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik. Jurnal UNM, 1(3), 1-14.
 
17.
Nindiasari, H. (2011). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar dan Instrumen untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Berbasis Pendekatan Metakognitif pada Siswa SMA. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY (pp. 251-263). Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
 
18.
Prastowo, A. (2012). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
 
19.
Putra, H. D. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa SMA dengan Pendekatan Scientific Disertai Strategi What If Not. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. 4, pp. 131-138. Cimahi: STKIP Siliwangi.
 
20.
Putra, H. D., Herman, T., & Sumarmo, U. (2017). Development of Student Worksheets to Improve the Ability of Mathematical Problem Posing. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme....
 
21.
Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2003). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Surabayar: YP3IT & Unesa Press.
 
22.
Rudd, R. D. (2007). Defining Critical Thinking. Techniques, 82(7), 46-49.
 
23.
Sabandar, J. (2008). Thinking Classroom dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah. Bandung: FPMIPA UPI.
 
24.
Sukmadinata, & Nana, S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
 
25.
Sumarmo, U. (2000). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Intelektual Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: FPMIPA UPI.
 
26.
Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Contextual Learning: Innovative Approach Towards the Development of Students’ Scientific Attitude and Natural Science Performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmst....
 
27.
Vaske. (2001). Critical Thinking in Adult Education: An Elusive Quest for a Definition of the Field. Des Moines, Iowa: Drake University.
 
28.
Widodo, C., & Jasmadi. (2008). Buku Panduan Menyusun Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
 
29.
Zhu, Y., Yu, W., & Cai, J. (2018). Understanding Students’ Mathematical Thinking for Effective Teaching: A Comparison Between Expert and Nonexpert Chinese Elementary Mathematics Teacher. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmst....
 
30.
Zulyadaini. (2017). A Development of Students’ Worksheet Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 13(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.9790/5728-1....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top