RESEARCH PAPER
How to Promote Knowledge Sharing among EVC Members? — Based on Interactive Perspective of Modified TAM Model
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Economics and Management, Shandong University of Science and Technology, CHINA
 
2
School of Business Administration, Hunan University, CHINA
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-09-16
 
 
Publication date: 2017-09-16
 
 
Corresponding author
Shi-Jian Wu   

College of Economics and Management, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China. Address to No.579 Qianwangang Road, Huangdao District, Qingdao city 266590, P.R. China. Tel: +86-532-8605-7027
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(9):6313-6323
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Compared with traditional learning methods, Educational virtual community has the incomparable advantage of knowledge diffusion with high efficiency and wide range. It is conductive to the knowledge acquisition and innovation of learners, and it provides a platform for learners to change their roles from the passive recipient of information to the main participant of knowledge acquisition. Based on the interactions between users’ personal, technical and organizational characteristics, a modified technology acceptance model was presented in this paper to explain the willingness and behavior of knowledge sharing in EVC in order to propose and validate the effects of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and psychological ownership on the willingness and behavior of knowledge sharing. In this research, the methods of interviewing and questionnaires with 40 questions included have adopted and 334 members from 32 educational virtual communities were surveyed. Based on the 326 valid samples, the hypothesis of research be tested with software SPSS 22.0 by structural equation model. Empirical research found that: Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use has remarkable positive impact on knowledge sharing willingness, and perceived usefulness with greater function can significantly promote perceived ease of use; psychological ownership can affect not only the knowledge sharing behavior through the knowledge sharing willingness, but also the behavior directly; the knowledge sharing willingness plays a fully mediating role between perceived usefulness and knowledge sharing behavior, while there exist the significant mediating effects between perceived ease of use and knowledge sharing behavior, and between psychological ownership and knowledge sharing behavior. Based on the conclusion of this research, the interactions between different factors should be taken into account in order to advance the willingness and behavior of knowledge sharing among EVC members and the perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and psychological ownership level of community members should be proactively promoted.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2010). Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173-191. doi:10.1002/job.583.
 
2.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decision Support Systems, 32(2), 201-214.
 
3.
Chen, C. J., & Hung, S. W. (2010). To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management, 47(4), 226-236. doi:10.1016/j.im.2010.03.001.
 
4.
Chen, M. H. (2015). Research on the Willingness of Students’ Sustainable Knowledge Sharing in Academic Virtual Community. Information and Documentation Services, 36(1), 41-47.
 
5.
Cheung, C. M. Y., Shek, S. P. W., & Sia, C. L. (2004). Virtual Community of Consumers: Why People Are Willing to Contribute. Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 2100-2107.
 
6.
Chou, C. H., Wang, Y. S., & Tang, T. I. (2015). Exploring the determinants of knowledge adoption in virtual communities: a social influence perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 364-376. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.02.001.
 
7.
Davis, Fred D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Society for Information Management and the Management Information Systems Research Center. doi:10.2307/249008.
 
8.
Furby, L. (1978). Possession in humans: exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior & Personality an International Journal, 6(1), 49-65. doi:10.2224/sbp.1978.6.1.49.
 
9.
Gang, K. W., & Ravichandran, T. (2015). Exploring the determinants of knowledge exchange in virtual communities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(1), 89-99. doi:10.1109/TEM.2014.2376521.
 
10.
Huang, W., & Zhang, P. (2016). Research on the influencing factors of knowledge sharing behavior of virtual community users. Information Science, 34(4), 68-73.
 
11.
Jin, H. (2015). Research on the mechanism of knowledge sharing of college teacher education blog based on DTPB - an empirical study from real users and potential users. Journal of Intelligence (10), 175-182.
 
12.
Nielsen, J. (2006a). Participation inequality: encouraging more users to contribute. Quaderns De Filologia Estudis Literaris, 2688(3), 11-25.
 
13.
Nielsen, J. (2006b). The 90-9-1 Rule for Participation Inequality in Social Media and Online Communities. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/article....
 
14.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4378028.
 
15.
Han, T. S., Chiang, H. H., & Chang, A. (2010). Employee participation in decision making, psychological ownership and knowledge sharing: mediating role of organizational commitment in Taiwanese high-tech organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12), 2218-2233. doi:10.1080/09585192.2010.509625.
 
16.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
 
17.
Wasko, M. L., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
 
18.
Yang, S. C., & Farn, C. K. (2009). Social capital, behavioral control, and tacit knowledge sharing—a multi-informant design. International Journal of Information Management, 29(3), 210-218. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.09.002.
 
19.
Yao, C. Y., & Fang, Y. C. (2015). Understanding social capital, team learning, members’ e-loyalty and knowledge sharing in virtual communities. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(5-6), 619-631. doi:10.1080/14783363.2013.865918.
 
20.
Yilmaz, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing behaviors in e-learning community: exploring the role of academic self-efficacy and sense of community. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 373-382. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.055.
 
21.
Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K. K., & Chen, H. (2010). Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 425-436. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.003.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top