Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER
Intuitionistic Linguistic Multiple Attribute Decision-making Based on Heronian Mean Method and Its Application to Evaluation of Scientific Research Capacity
1
College of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, CHINA
2
School of Business, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, CHINA
Online publication date: 2017-11-22
Publication date: 2017-11-22
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(12):8017-8025
KEYWORDS
intuitionistic linguistic setHeronian meanmultiple attribute group decision makingscientific research capacity
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The main focus of this paper is to investigate intuitionistic linguistic information fusion based on Heronian mean. Two new intuitionistic linguistic aggregation operators called intuitionistic linguistic generalized Heronian mean (ILGHM) and intuitionistic linguistic generalized weighted Heronian mean (ILGWHM) operators, are introduced. The ILGHM and ILGWHM operators are characterized by the ability to deal with the intuitionistic linguistic multiple attribute decision making problems in which the attributes are interactive. Some desired properties and special cases with respect to the different parameter values in the developed operators are studied. Furthermore, a method based on the proposed operators is developed to deal with multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) method problems. Finally, an illustrative example concerning evaluation of scientific research capacity is provided to illustrate the decision-making process and to discuss the influences of different parameters on the decision-making results.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Atanassov, K. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87-96.
2.
Beliakov, G., Pradera, A., & Calvo, T. (2007). Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007.
3.
Boran, F. E., & Akay, D. (2014). A biparametric similarity measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition. Information Sciences, 255, 45-57.
4.
Chang, T. C., & Wang, H. (2016). A Multi Criteria Group Decision-making Model for Teacher Evaluation in Higher Education Based on Cloud Model and Decision Tree. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5).
5.
Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2000). Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(1), 67-82.
6.
Hsieh, M. Y., & Chan, Y. K. (2016). Is Online Learning Able to Effectively Decrease Tuition and Miscellaneous Fees Debt of Higher Education in Taiwan. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1313-1326.
7.
Ju, Y. B., Liu, X. Y., & Ju, D. W. (2016). Some new intuitionistic linguistic aggregation operators based on Maclaurin symmetric mean and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making. Soft Computing, 20(11), 4521-4548.
8.
Liu, P. (2013). Some generalized dependent aggregation operators with intuitionistic linguistic numbers and their application to group decision making. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 79(1), 131-143.
9.
Liu, P. D., & Wang, Y. M. (2014). Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on intuitionistic linguistic power generalized aggregation operators. Applied Soft Computing, 17(5), 90-104.
10.
Merigo, J. M., & Yager, R. R. (2013). Generalized moving averages, distance measures and OWA operators. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(4), 533-559.
11.
Peng, D. H., Gao, C. Y., & Gao, Z. F. (2013). Generalized hesitant fuzzy synergetic weighted distance measures and their application to multiple criteria decision-making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(8), 5837-5850.
12.
Su, W. H., Li, W., Zeng, S. Z., & Zhang, C. H. (2014). Atanassov’s intuitionistic linguistic ordered weighted averaging distance operator and its application to decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 26(3), 1491-1502.
13.
Wan, S. P., Wang, F., Dong, J. Y. (2016). A novel group decision making method with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations for RFID technology selection. Applied Soft Computing, 38, 405-422.
14.
Wang, J. Q., & Li, H. B. (2010). Multi-criteria decision-making method based on aggregation operators for intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy numbers. Control and Decision, 25(10), 1571-1574.
15.
Xu, Z. S. (2007). Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15(6), 1179-1187.
16.
Xu, Z. S. (2015). Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega, 33(3), 249-254.
17.
Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man and Cybernetics B, 18(1), 183-190.
18.
Yager, R. R. (2004). Generalized OWA aggregation operators. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3(1), 93-107.
19.
Yu, D. J. (2013). Prioritized information fusion method for triangular intuitionistic fuzzy set and its application to teaching quality evaluation. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28(5), 411-435.
20.
Yu, D. J. (2015). Intuitionistic fuzzy theory based typhoon disaster evaluation in Zhejiang Province, China: a comparative perspective. Natural Hazards, 75(3), 2559-2576.
22.
Zeng, S. Z., & Chen, S. (2015). Extended VIKOR method based on induced aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy financial decision making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research Issue, 49(4), 289-303.
23.
Zeng, S. Z., & Xiao Y. (2016). TOPSIS method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making and its application to investment selection. Kybernetes, 45(2), 282-296.
24.
Zeng, S. Z., Chen, J. P., & Li, X. S. (2016). A Hybrid Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision Making. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(2), 403-422.
25.
Zeng, S. Z., Su, W. H., & Zhang, C. H. (2016). Intuitionistic fuzzy generalized probabilistic ordered weighted averaging operator and its application to group decision making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(2), 177-193.
26.
Zhou, L. G., Chen, H. Y., & Liu, J. P. (2012). Generalized power aggregation operators and their applications in group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(4), 989-999.
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
