RESEARCH PAPER
Involvement of the student in their learning: Effects of formative assessment on competency development
 
More details
Hide details
1
Universidad César Vallejo, Lima, PERU
 
2
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, PERU
 
3
Educational Institution 3056 Great Britain, Lima, PERU
 
4
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, PERU
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-04-11
 
 
Publication date: 2024-05-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(5):em2440
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The study aimed to establish the influence of formative assessment on the attainment of scientific and technological competencies in a school in Lima, Peru. We formulated and subsequently tested hypothesis of the positive impact of formative evaluation on science and technology competencies. The authors used the questionnaire associated with formative evaluative practices and to measure the development of competencies gradings of 116 second-grade high school students. It was found that formative assessment significatively influences the development of scientific and technological competencies, predicting a 0.708 increase in educational outcomes (pseudo R-squared Nagelkerke). This influence on competency attainment was examined through regression analysis. It was concluded that formative assessment, along with all its dimensions, influences the achievement of competencies related to science and technology. We recommend that its implementation in classrooms should receive greater dissemination.
 
REFERENCES (47)
1.
Anijovich, R., & Cappelletti, G. (2020). La retroalimentación formativa: Una oportunidad para mejorar los aprendizajes y la enseñanza [Formative feedback: An opportunity to improve learning and teaching]. Revista Docencia Universitaria [University Teaching Magazine], 21(1), 81-96.
 
2.
Atienza, R., Valencia, A., Martos, D., López, V. & Devís, J. (2016). La percepción del alumnado universitario de educación física sobre la evaluación formativa: Ventajas, dificultades y satisfacción [The perception of university physical education students about formative evaluation: Advantages, difficulties and satisfaction]. Movimento [Movement], 22(4), 1033-1048. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-....
 
3.
Babinčáková, M., Ganajová, M., Sotáková, I., & Bernard, P. (2020). The implementation of formative assessment into chemistry education at secondary school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/....
 
4.
Beekman, K., Joosten, D., & Boshuizen, E. (2021). Sustainability of developed self-regulation by means of formative assessment among young adolescents: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.....
 
5.
Beriche, M., & Medina, P. (2021). Formative evaluation: Implementation and main challenges present on schools or higher education. Educación [Education], 27(2), 201-208. https://doi.org/10.33539/educa....
 
6.
Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5-31. https://doi.org/10.4135/978144....
 
7.
Broadbent, J., Sharman, S., Panadero, E., & Fuller, M. (2021). How does self-regulated learning influence formative assessment and summative grade? Comparing online and blended learners. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihed....
 
8.
Cañadas, L. (2020). Contribution of formative assessment for developing teaching competences in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 516-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/026197....
 
9.
Cerón-Urzua, C., Cossío, M., Pezoa, P., & Gómez, R. (2020). Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para evaluar desempeño docente asociado a las prácticas evaluativas formativas [Design and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate teaching performance associated with formative evaluation practices]. Revista Complutense de Educación [Complutense Education Magazine], 31(4), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.6....
 
10.
Creswell, J., & Creswell, D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
 
11.
Duro, E. (2022). Evaluación formativa para mejorar la educación [Formative assessment to improve education]. Propuesta Educativa [Educational Proposal], 31(58), 49-62.
 
12.
Fernández, D., Banay, W., De la Cruz, L., & Alegre, J. (2022). Learning achievement and competences development through formative assessment. Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación [Journal of Research in Educational Sciences], 6(23), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.33996/revis....
 
13.
Fernández-Río, J., Cecchini, J., Lopes, L., Silva, H., & Leite, A. (2023). Self-efficacy, self-regulation and cooperative learning in secondary education Spanish and Portuguese students. Education XX1, 26(1), 117-139. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx....
 
14.
Fraile, J., Gil, M., Zamorano, D., & Sánchez, I. (2020). Autorregulación del aprendizaje y procesos de evaluación formativa en los trabajos en grupo [Self-regulation of learning and formative evaluation processes in group work]. RELIEVE, 26(1), M5. http://doi.org/10.7203/relieve....
 
15.
Fraile, J., Ruiz, P., Zamorano, D., & Orgaz, D. (2021). Evaluación formativa, autorregulaciòn, feedback y herramientas digitales: Uso de Socrative en educación superior [Formative evaluation, self-regulation, feedback and digital tools: Use of Socrative in higher education]. Retos, 42, 724-734. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos....
 
16.
Gedikli, H., & Buldur, S. (2022). The effects of formative assessment practices in science education on students’ metacognitive knowledge and regulation skills. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37(4), 1393-1415. https://doi.org/10.16986/huje.....
 
17.
Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stue....
 
18.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning inside. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
19.
Hernández, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta [Investigation methodology: The quantitative, qualitative and mixed routes]. McGraw Hill.
 
20.
Ismail, S., Rahui, D., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468....
 
21.
Kültür, Z., & Kutlu, M. (2021). The effect of formative assessment on high school students' mathematics achievement and attitudes. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.33902/ JPR.2021474302.
 
22.
Llece-Unesco (2021). Evaluación formativa: Una oportunidad para transformar la educación en tiempos de pandemia [Formative assessment: An opportunity to transform education in times of pandemic]. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark....
 
23.
López-Vázquez, R., Tobón-Tobón, S., Veytia-Bucheli, G., & Juárez-Hernández, G. (2021). Mediación didáctica e inclusión educativa en la educación básica desde el enfoque socioformativo [Didactic mediation and educational inclusion in basic education from the socio-formative approach]. Revista de Investigación Educativa [Educational Research Magazine], 39(2), 527-552. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.44....
 
24.
Martínez-Rizo, F. (2013). Dificultades para implementar la evaluación formative: Revisión de literatura [Difficulties in implementing formative evaluation: Literature review]. Perfiles Educativos [Educational Profiles], 35(139), 128-150. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue....
 
25.
Meusen-Beekman, K., Joosten, D., & Boshuizen, H. (2016). Effects of formative assessment to develop self-regulation among sixth grade students: Results from a randomized controlled intervention. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 51, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stue....
 
26.
Minedu. (2017). Currículo nacional de la educación básica [National curriculum of basic education]. Ministerio de Educación del Perú [Ministry of Education of Peru]. http://www.minedu.gob.pe/curri....
 
27.
Minedu. (2020). Resolución viceministerial N° 00094-2020-MINEDU. Norma que regula la evaluación de las competencias de los estudiantes de la educación básica [Vice-ministerial resolution No. 00094-2020-MINEDU. Standard that regulates the evaluation of the competencies of basic education students]. Ministerio de Educación del Perú [Ministry of Education of Peru]. https://www.grade.org.pe/creer....
 
28.
Minedu. (2023). El valor de la evaluación formative [The value of formative evaluation]. Ministerio de Educación del Perú [Ministry of Education of Peru].. https://www.gob.pe/institucion....
 
29.
Mollo, M., & Medina, P. (2020). Formative evaluation: Towards a comprehensive pedagogical proposal in times of pandemic. Maestro y Sociedad [Master and Society], 17(4), 635-651.
 
30.
Msosa, A., Bruce, J., & Crouch, R. (2021). Effect of a formative assessment intervention of nursing skills laboratory learning in a resource constrained country. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt....
 
31.
Ozan, C., & Kincal, R. (2018). The effects of formative assessment on academic achievement, attitudes toward the lesson, and self-regulation skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(1), 85-118. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.....
 
32.
Pallares, J., Parra, H., Garcidueñas, A., López, J., Cervantes, C., & Navarro, K. (2022). The socio-formative rubrics in the OSCE to assess the level of achievement of the competences comprising the profile of the physician graduate. Educación Médica [Medical Education], 23(3), 100740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edum....
 
33.
Panadero, E., & Broadbent, J. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: A self-regulated learning perspective. In D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson, & J. Tai (Eds.), Developing evaluative judgement in higher education: Assessment for knowing and producing quality work (pp. 81-89). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
34.
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 13-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384....
 
35.
Panadero, E., Brown, G., & Strijbos, W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648....
 
36.
Pérez-Pino, M., Enrique-Clavero, J., Carbó, J., & González, M. (2017). La evaluación formativa en el proceso enseñanza aprendizaje [Formative evaluation in the teaching-learning process]. Edumecentro, 9(3), 263-283.
 
37.
Pozo, J., & Mateos, M. (2009). Aprender a aprender: Hacia una gestion autónoma y metacognitive del aprendizaje [Learning to learn: Towards an autonomous and metacognitive management of learning]. Ediciones Morata [Morata Editions].
 
38.
Sanmartí, N. (2010). Aprender a evaluarse: Motor de todo aprendizaje [Learning to evaluate yourself: Engine of all learning]. Aula de Innovación Educativa [Educational Innovation Classroom], 192(6), 26-29.
 
39.
Sanmartí, N. (2020). Evaluar y aprender: Un único proceso [Evaluate and learn: A single process]. Octaedro Editorial.
 
40.
Sanmartí, N. (2021). ¿Qué sabemos de la importancia del valor del error y de su gestión para el aprendizaje? [What do we know about the importance of the value of errors and their management for learning?]. https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/caplli....
 
41.
Sanmartí, N., Flores, E., & Quintanilla, M. (2020). Memorias primer foro virtual de evaluación formativa por una evaluación diferenciada en tiempos de crisis, para profesores en formación inicial y continua [Reports first virtual formative evaluation forum for a differentiated evaluation in times of crisis, for teachers in initial and continuing training]. https://repositorio.unicordoba....
 
42.
Simon, B. (2019). The effect of formative assessment on student motivation and self-regulation [PhD thesis, Concordia University St. Paul].
 
43.
Sotaková, I., Ganajová, M., & Babincaková, M. (2020). Inquiry-based science education as a revision strategy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(3), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/....
 
44.
Vargas-Quispe, G., Sito-Justiniano, L., Toledo, S., Toledo-Espinoza, M., & Mendoza, M. (2022). Evaluación formativa y las tecnologías del aprendizaje y conocimiento [Formative evaluation and learning and knowledge technologies]. Universidad y Sociedad [University and Society], 14(1), 339-348.
 
45.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
 
46.
Wafubwa, R., & Csikos. C. (2022). Formative assessment as a predictor of mathematics teachers’ levels of metacognitive regulation. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 983-998. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2....
 
47.
William, D. (2010). The role of formative assessment in effective learning environments. In H. Dumont, D. Islances, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 135-155). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/978926....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top