RESEARCH PAPER
Mobile Games for Negotiated-Play and Decision-Making in Health Literacy
 
More details
Hide details
1
Center for Social Innovation, CYPRUS
 
2
University of Groningen, NETHERLANDS
 
3
CARDET - University of Nicosia, Nicosia, CYPRUS
 
 
Publication date: 2020-06-20
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2020;16(9):em1873
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this qualitative case study study is to examine the ways in which mobile videogames can be used in non-formal educational environments, to support students to develop decision-making skills through negotiated play. In the context of this study, the health literacy mobile videogame, PlayForward: Elm City Stories developed at Yale University was implemented in an afterschool setting in southern Europe. In this study we explored how secondary school students negotiate meaning, make decisions, and interpret the consequences in a non-formal education context, through an interpretive symbolic-interactive framework. The data included individual interviews with students, field-notes, and video-based student-groups’ interactions. These were analyzed with the use of open coding techniques. The analysis of the data resulted in the following three assertions: (a) The technical affordances of the game such as sound, usability, rating system, and visuals, are vital features that defined the quality of play and learning experience; (b) The narrative of the game guided the learning game-play experience of the students; and, (c) Students perceived that their engagement in the game facilitated their collaboration and decision-making. These are discussed alongside recommendations for game design for supporting negotiated play and decision-making.
 
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Amory, A. (2007). Game object model version II: a theoretical framework for educational game development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(1), 51-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423....
 
2.
Arnab, S., Brown, K., Clarke, S., Dunwell, I., Lim, T., Suttie, N., Louchart, S., Hendrix, M., & De Freitas, S. (2013). The development approach of a pedagogically-driven serious game to support Relationship and Sex Education within a classroom setting. Computers & Education, 69, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
3.
Blumberg, F. C., Almonte, D. E., Anthony, J. S., & Hashimoto, N. (2013). 19 Serious Games: What Are They? What Do They Do? Why Should We Play Them? (p. 334). The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxford....
 
4.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of computer assisted learning, 26(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
 
5.
Cunningham, D., & Duffy, T. (1996). Constructivism: implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170-198). London: Prentice Hall.
 
6.
Dickey, M. D. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 253-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423....
 
7.
Fiellin, L. E., Hieftje, K., Edelman, E. J., & Camenga, D. R. (2013). Play To Prevent Can Video Games Make Kids Healthier? Footnote1. Retrieved from http://footnote1.com/can-video....
 
8.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780....
 
9.
Fuchslocher, A., Niesenhaus, J., & Krämer, N. (2011). Serious games for health: An empirical study of the game “Balance” for teenagers with diabetes mellitus. Entertainment Computing, 2(2), 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entc....
 
10.
Galotti, K. M. (2002). Making decisions that matter: How people face important life choices. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
 
11.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. San Francisco, California: The Sociology Press.
 
12.
Hense, J., & Mandl, H. (2014). Learning in or with Games?. In Digital Systems for Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning (pp. 181-193). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
13.
Hernandez, L. M. (Ed.). (2013). Health Literacy: Improving Health, Health Systems, and Health Policy Around the World: Workshop Summary. National Academies Press.
 
14.
Hieftje, K., Duncan, L. R., & Fiellin, L. E. (2014). Novel methods to collect meaningful data from adolescents for the development of health interventions. Health promotion practice, 15(5), 714-722. https://doi.org/10.1177/152483....
 
15.
Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in learning technology, 20.14406. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v2....
 
16.
Kim, S. H., Mims, C., & Holmes, K. P. (2006). An introduction to current trends and benefits of mobile wireless technology use in higher education. AACE journal, 14(1), 77-100.
 
17.
Koutromanos, G., & Avraamidou, L. (2014). The use of mobile games in formal and informal learning settings: A review of the literature. Educational Media International, 51(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/095239....
 
18.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Social Learning: Everyday Practices and Social Learning. McGraw-Hill International.
 
19.
Lenhart, A., Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Macgill, A. R., Evans, C., & Vitak, J. (2008). Teens, Video Games, and Civics: Teens’ Gaming Experiences Are Diverse and Include Significant Social Interaction and Civic Engagement. Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
 
20.
Linehan, C., Lawson, S., Doughty, M., & Kirman, B. (2009). Thereʼs no ʻIʼ in ʻEmergency Management Team: ʼ Designing and evaluating a serious game for training emergency managers in group decision making skills. In Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the Society for the Advancement of Games & Simulations in Education and Training (pp. 20-27). Innovation North-Leeds Metropolitan University.
 
21.
Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1893-1906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
22.
McCallum, S. (2012). Gamification and serious games for personalized health. Stud Health Technol Inform, 177, 85-96.
 
23.
McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. London: Penguin.
 
24.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: a guide to design and interpretation. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
 
25.
Mishra, R. K. (2014). Social constructivism and teaching of social science. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 5(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser....
 
26.
Montanaro, E., Fiellin, L. E., Fakhouri, T., Kyriakides, T. C., & Duncan, L. R. (2015). Using videogame apps to assess gains in adolescents’ substance use knowledge: new opportunities for evaluating intervention exposure and content mastery. Journal of medical Internet research, 17(10), e245. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4....
 
27.
Montgomery, K., Gottlieb-Robles, B., & Larson, G. O. (2004). Youth as e-citizens: Engaging the digital generation. Washington DC: Center for Social Media School of Communication, American University.
 
28.
Muntean, C. I. (2011, October). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. In Proc. 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL (pp. 323-329).
 
29.
Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G. N., & Sharples, M. (2004). Mobile technologies and learning. hal-00190143.
 
30.
Olson, C. K. (2010). Children’s motivations for video game play in the context of normal development. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00189....
 
31.
O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851....
 
32.
Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrod....
 
33.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
 
34.
Raphael, C., Bachen, C., Lynn, K. M., Baldwin-Philippi, J., & McKee, K. A. (2010). Games for civic learning: A conceptual framework and agenda for research and design. Games and Culture, 5(2), 199-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/155541....
 
35.
Ray, B., Caroline Faure EDD, A. T. C., & Kelle, F. (2013). Using social impact games (SIGS) to support constructivist learning: Creating a foundation for effective use in the secondary social studies education. American Secondary Education, 41(2), 60.
 
36.
Robertson, J., & Howells, C. (2008). Computer game design: Opportunities for successful learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 559-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
37.
Schugurensky, D., & Myers, J. P. (2008). Informal Civic Learning Through Engagement in Local Democracy: The Case of the Seniors’ Task Force of Healthy City Toronto. In Learning through Community (pp. 73-95). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
 
38.
Sherry, J. L., Lucas, K., Greenberg, B. S., & Lachlan, K. (2006). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 213-224). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
 
39.
Shin, N., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). Mobile Gaming Environment: Learning and motivational effects. In P. Felicia (Ed.), Handbook of research on improving learning and motivation through educational games: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 467-481). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-....
 
40.
Stake, R. E. (2011). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
 
41.
Stokes, B. (2012). Restructuring civic engagement: Meaningful choice and game design thinking. In A. Delwiche & J. J. Henderson (Eds.), The Participatory Cultures Handbook. New York, NY: Routledge.
 
42.
Strack, R. W., Magill, C., & McDonagh, K. (2004). Engaging youth through photovoice. Health promotion practice, 5(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/152483....
 
43.
Walker, K. (2006). Introduction: Mapping the landscape of mobile learning. In M. Sharples (Ed.), Big issues in mobile learning: Report of a workshop by the kaleidoscope network of excellence mobile learning initiative. University of Nottingham.
 
44.
Whitton, N., & Hollins, P. (2008). Collaborative virtual gaming worlds in higher education. Research in learning technology, 16(3). 221-229. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v1....
 
45.
Wilson, K. A., Bedwell, W. L., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Estock, J. L., & Conkey, C. (2009). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes review and research proposals. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2), 217-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/104687....
 
46.
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO; 2013). Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe. Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA): Cologne.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top