RESEARCH PAPER
Pre-service teachers’ ideas about obtaining electricity in nuclear power stations in a role play context
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Science Education, University of Malaga, Malaga, SPAIN
 
 
Publication date: 2022-10-06
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(11):em2176
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study examined whether participation in a role play on the socio-scientific issue of the use of nuclear power had an impact on pre-service primary teachers’ ideas regarding the process of obtaining electricity in a nuclear power station. Before and after the role play, 78 pre-service primary teachers were asked to describe this process to analyze the ideas they displayed about the stages involved in it. The results showed, overall, an increased presence of more scientifically informed ideas in some of these stages following the role play, although a number of non-scientifically informed ideas persisted, for example, regarding the way in which heat is obtained or the final transformation of energy into electricity. These results support the potential value of role play for developing more scientifically informed ideas, although some modifications of the role play are recommended for further development of them.
 
REFERENCES (66)
1.
Agell, L., Soria, V., & Carrió, M. (2015). Using role play to debate animal testing. Journal of Biological Education, 49(3), 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/002192....
 
2.
Atabey, N., & Arslan, A. (2020). The effect of teaching socioscientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. Elementary Education Online, 19(2), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkon....
 
3.
Ates, H., & Saracoglu, M. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ views about nuclear energy with respect to gender and university providing instruction. Science Education International, 27(2), 238-252.
 
4.
Belova, N., Eilks, I., & Feierabend, T. (2015). The evaluation of role-playing in the context of teaching climate change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
5.
Bossér, U., & Lindahl, M. G. (2020). Students’ use of open-minded attitude and elaborate talk in group discussion and role-playing debate on socioscientific issues. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1910. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
6.
Brown, K. (2018). The effects of a university research reactor’s outreach program on students’ attitudes and knowledge about nuclear radiation. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 484-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/026351....
 
7.
Cakici, Y., & Bayir, E. (2012). Developing children’s views of the nature of science through role play. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7), 1075-1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
8.
Cansiz, N., & Cansiz, M. (2015). Views and knowledge of preservice science teachers about nuclear power plants. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(2), 216-224.
 
9.
Casas-Quiroga, L., & Crujeiras-Pérez, B. (2020). Epistemic operations performed by high school students in an argumentation and decision-making context: Setrocia’s alimentary emergency. International Journal of Science Education, 42(16), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
10.
Coolican, H. (2009). Research methods and statistics in psychology. Hodder Education Group.
 
11.
Craciun, D. (2010). Role-playing as a creative method in science education. Journal of Science and Arts, 1(12), 175-182.
 
12.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
 
13.
Crujeiras-Pérez, B., Martín-Gámez, C., Díaz-Moreno, N., & Fernández-Oliveras, A. (2020). Trabajar la argumentación a través de un juego de rol: ¿debemos instalar un cementerio nuclear? [Teaching argumentation through role play: Should we create a nuclear cemetery?]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias [Science Education], 38(3), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/en....
 
14.
Cruz-Lorite, I. M., Acebal, M. C., Cebrián, D., & Blanco, A. (2020). El juego de rol como estrategia didáctica para el desarrollo de la conciencia ambiental. Una Investigación Basada en el Diseño (IBD) [Role play as a way of developing students' environmental awareness: A study of design-based learning (DBL)]. Revista de Educación Ambiental y Sostenibilidad, 2(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_e....
 
15.
de Sá Ibraim, S., & Justi, R. (2016). Teachers’ knowledge in argumentation: Contributions from an explicit teaching in an initial teacher education programme. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 1996-2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
16.
de Sá Ibraim, S., & Justi, R. (2022). Actions that contribute to science teaching involving argumentation and their relationships with pedagogical content knowledge. Investigações Em Ensino de Ciências [Investigations in Science Teaching], 27(1), 388-414. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-....
 
17.
Domínguez, J. M., de Pro, A., & García-Rodeja, E. (1998). Las partículas de la materia y su utilización en el campo conceptual de calor y temperatura: un estudio transversal [Particles of matter and their use in the conceptual field of heat and temperature: A cross-sectional study]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias [Science Education], 16(3), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/en....
 
18.
Ercan, O., Ural, E., & Tekbiyik, A. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards nuclear energy and the effect of Fukushima nuclear disaster on their attitudes. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 11(2), 1669-1678. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijssh....
 
19.
Es, H., Mercan, S. I., & Ayas, C. (2016). A new socio-scientific issue for Turkey: Life with nuclear. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(2), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje....
 
20.
España, E., & Prieto, T. (2005). Controversia sobre los alimentos transgénicos: ¿la llevarías a tu clase? [The controversy over genetically modified foods: Would you address it in your classroom?]. Kikiriki: Cooperación Educativa [Kikiriki: Educational Cooperation], 78, 71-75.
 
21.
España, E., Rueda, J. A., & Blanco, A. (2013). Juegos de rol sobre el calentamiento global. Actividades de enseñanza realizadas por estudiantes de ciencias del Máster en Profesorado de Secundaria [Role play on global warming: Teaching activities carried out by preservice science teachers]. Revista Eureka sobre enseñanza y divulgación de las ciencias, 10, 763-779. http://hdl.handle.net/10498/15....
 
22.
European Commission. (2009). Special Eurobarometer 324: Europeans and nuclear safety. https://data.europa.eu/data/da....
 
23.
European Commission. (2022). Public opinion on the war in Ukraine. https://www.europarl.europa.eu....
 
24.
Evagorou, M., & Dillon, J. (2011). Argumentation in the teaching of science. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 189-203). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90....
 
25.
Evren, A., & Aycan, S. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ decisions and types of informal reasoning about the socioscientific issue of nuclear power plants. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategy Research, 13(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr....
 
26.
Fernández-Oliveras, A., Martín-Gámez, C., Díaz-Moreno, N., & Crujeiras-Pérez, B. (2022). Cementerio nuclear, ¿sí o no? Una propuesta para la formación docente inicial en pensamiento crítico [Nuclear cemetery, yes or no? A proposal for initial teacher training in critical thinking]. Estudios Pedagógicos [Pedagogical Studies], 48(1), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-....
 
27.
Ferreira, M. A., & Faustino, H. (2013). Learning through role-playing games: An approach for active learning and teaching. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica [Brazilian Journal of Medical Education], 37(1), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-....
 
28.
Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons.
 
29.
Franciosi, S. J., & Mehring. J. (2015). What do students learn by playing an online simulation game? In F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouësny (Eds), Critical CALL–Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference (pp. 170-176). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet....
 
30.
Freire, S., Baptista, M., & Freire, A. (2016). Sustainability and science learning: Perceptions from 8th grade students involved with a role playing activity. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 1757-1763. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.....
 
31.
Howes, E. V., & Cruz, B. C. (2009). Role-playing in science education: An effective strategy for developing multiple perspectives. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(3), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0317....
 
32.
Iordanou, K., & Kuhn, D. (2020). Contemplating the opposition: Does a personal touch matter? Discourse Processes, 57(4), 343-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/016385....
 
33.
Iscan, Y., & Seyhan, H. (2021). The effect of the 5E learning model supported with material ensuring conceptual change on science achievement: the example of “heat and temperature”. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar [Elementary School Pulpit], 8(3), 250-280. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimba....
 
34.
Jho, H., Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. (2014). The relationship of science knowledge, attitude and decision making on socio-scientific issues: The case study of students’ debates on a nuclear power plant in Korea. Science and Education, 23, 1131-1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
35.
Kilinc, A., Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2013). Exploring students’ ideas about risks and benefits of nuclear power using perception theories. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 252-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
 
36.
Kohnle, A., Mclean, S., & Aliotta, M. (2011). Towards a conceptual diagnostic survey in nuclear physics. European Journal of Physics, 32(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0....
 
37.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1997). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/252931....
 
38.
Maharaj-Sharma, R. (2008). Using role-play to develop science concepts. Caribbean Curriculum, 15, 25-43.
 
39.
Mikeska, J. N., & Howell, H. (2020). Simulations as practice‐based spaces to support elementary teachers in learning how to facilitate argumentation‐focused science discussions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1356-1399. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21....
 
40.
Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge. (2019). Nuclear energy. https://energia.gob.es/Nuclear....
 
41.
Ministry of Education and Vocational Training. (2022). Real Decreto 157/2022, de 1 de marzo, por el que se establecen la ordenación y las enseñanzas mínimas de la educación primaria [Royal Decree 157/2022, of 1 March, establishing the organization and minimum teachings of primary education]. BOE. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2....
 
42.
Nakiboglu, C. & Tekin, B. B. (2006). Identifying students’ misconceptions about nuclear chemistry a study of turkish high school students. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(11), 1712-1718. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p....
 
43.
Namdar, B., & Shen, J. (2016). Intersection of argumentation and the use of multiple representations in the context of socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1100-1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
44.
Nuclear Safety Council. (2019). Nuclear energy. https://www.csn.es/la-energia-....
 
45.
Ozturk, N., & Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2017). Preservice science teachers’ epistemological beliefs and informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1275-1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
46.
Pontes, A. (2000). Aprendizaje reflexivo y enseñanza de la energía: Una propuesta metodológica [Reflective learning and teaching about energy: A proposed approach]. Alambique: Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales [Alembic: Didactics of Experimental Sciences], 25, 80-94.
 
47.
RTVE. (2019). Las grandes eléctricas pactan el cierre escalonado de las centrales nucleares españolas entre 2025 y 2035 [Electricity giants agree gradual shutdown of Spain’s nuclear plants between 2025 and 2035]. https://www.rtve.es/noticias/2....
 
48.
Saad, L. (2022). Americans divided on nuclear energy. Gallup News. https://news.gallup.com/poll/3....
 
49.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20....
 
50.
Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 1-9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
51.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89, 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
 
52.
Saglam, H. I., & Eroglu, B. (2022). A mixed-method study on pre-service teachers’ informal reasoning regarding nuclear energy use. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 594-607. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused....
 
53.
Santamaría-Cárdaba, N. (2020). Families, experiments, and nature: Learning science through project-based learning. School Science and Mathematics, 120(8) 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12....
 
54.
Schnurr, M. A., De Santo, E. M., Green, A. D., & Taylor, A. (2015). Investigating student perceptions of knowledge acquisition within a role-play simulation of the convention on biological diversity. The Journal of Geography, 114(3), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/002213....
 
55.
Siersma, P. T., Pol, H. J., van Joolingen, W. R., & Visscher, A. J. (2021). Pre-university students’ conceptions regarding radiation and radioactivity in a medical context. International Journal of Science Education, 43(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
56.
Simonneaux, L. (2001). Role-play or debate to promote students’ argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 903-927. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
57.
Simonneaux, L. (2008). Argumentation in socio-scientific contexts. In S. Erduran, & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 179-199). Sense.
 
58.
Skamp, K., Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M., Rodriguez, M., Malandrakis, G., Fortner, R., Kilinc, A., Taylor, N., Chhokar, K., Dua, S., Ambusaidi, A., Cheong, I., Kim, M., & Yoon, H.-G. (2019). Renewable and nuclear energy: An international study of students’ beliefs about, and willingness to act, in relation to two energy production scenarios. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 295-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
59.
Soekarjo, M., & van Oostendorp, H. (2015). Measuring effectiveness of persuasive games using an informative control condition. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(2), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.....
 
60.
Solbes, J. (2007). Una propuesta para la enseñanza aprendizaje de la energía y su conservación basada en la investigación en didáctica de las ciencias [An inquiry-based approach to teaching and learning about energy and its conservation]. Revista de Enseñanza de la Física [Journal of Physics Education], 20(1), 65-90. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/in....
 
61.
Solbes, J., & Tarín, F. (1998). Algunas dificultades en torno a la conservación de la energía [Some difficulties in relation to energy conservation]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias [Science Education], 16(3), 387-397. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/en....
 
62.
Solbes, J., & Torres, N. (2018). Energía nuclear: Una cuestión sociocientífica para el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico [Nuclear energy: A socio-scientific issue for developing critical thinking]. In D. Melissa-Conrado, & N. Nunes-Net (Eds.), Questões sociocientíficas: Fundamentos, propostas de ensino e perspectivas para ações sociopolítica [Socio-scientific issues: Fundamentals, teaching proposals and ideas for sociopolitical action] (pp. 375-394). Editora da UFBA. https://doi.org/10.7476/978852....
 
63.
Solomon, J. (1985). Teaching the conservation of energy. Physics Education, 20, 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9....
 
64.
Verdugo, J. J., Solaz, J. J., & Sanjosé, V. (2019). Evaluación del conocimiento científico en maestros en formación inicial: El caso de la Comunidad Valenciana [Assessing scientific knowledge among preservice teachers: The case of the Valencian Community]. Revista de Educación [Education Magazine], 383, 133-162. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-5....
 
65.
Wijaya, S. A., & Fanani, M. B. (2019). Comparing role playing model and group guidance to improve students’ entrepreneurship skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis dan Manajemen [Journal of Business and Management Education], 5(2), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.17977/um003....
 
66.
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 711-740). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top