Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
RESEARCH PAPER
Relationship between Teaching Context and Teachers’ Orientations to Science Teaching
1
University of Johannesburg, Gauteng, SOUTH AFRICA
Online publication date: 2018-06-01
Publication date: 2018-06-01
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(8):em1564
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The social context available to science teachers is known to influence their classroom practices or pedagogical orientation. This study investigated how social context influences pedagogical orientations at three township schools in South Africa. The study employed a qualitative case-study design involving three Grade 9 Natural Sciences teachers. Data collection involved pre-lesson interviews; lesson observations using the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP); post-lesson interviews; and analysis of documents. Data were analysed using a constant comparative method. Findings revealed that learners’ socio-cultural practices, experiences and beliefs influenced teachers’ pedagogical orientations in two important ways. Firstly, their teaching became more process- and activity-driven. Secondly, teachers’ views about the goals of science teaching changed. Rather than a focus purely on curriculum coverage and exam preparation, building learner confidence, stimulating appreciation for the relevance of science, and motivating learners also became important. Implications drawn for in-service and pre-service teacher development programmes are discussed.
REFERENCES (62)
1.
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. A. Lederman, (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105‒1150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
Abell, S. K., Rogers, P., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. (2009). Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: A model for developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 77‒93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972....
3.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Prospects for research in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843....
4.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269‒287. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...<269::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T.
5.
Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1987). Teaching science. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators’ handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84‒111). New York: Longman.
6.
Appleton, K., & Harrison, A. (2001). Outcomes-based science units that enhance primary and secondary science teachers’ PCK. Fremantle: Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Conference.
7.
Basili, P. A., & Sanford, J. P. (1991). Conceptual change strategies and cooperative group work in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 293‒304. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.36....
8.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544‒559.
9.
Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., & Lubben, F. (2003). A systematic review of the effects of context-led and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science. Version 1.1 In Research evidence in education library. London: EPPICentre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
10.
Brickhouse, N., & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of research in science teaching, 29(5), 471‒485. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.36....
11.
Bush, T., & Heystek, J. (2003). School governance in the new South Africa. Compare, 3, 127‒138. https://doi.org/10.1080/030579....
12.
Chisholm, L., & Sujee, M. (2006). Tracking racial desegregation in South Africa Schools. Journal of Education, 40, 441–159.
13.
Çimer, A. (2007). Effective teaching in science: A review of literature. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(1), 20‒44.
14.
Creswell, J. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, evaluating quantitative and qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
15.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). California: Sage Publications Inc.
16.
Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2011). National Curriculum Statement (NCS) Grades 9-12. Republic of South Africa: Department of Education. Pretoria: Government Printer.
17.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147‒164). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
18.
Frempong, G., Reddy, V., & Kanjee, A. (2011). Exploring equity and quality education in South Africa using multilevel models. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(6), 819‒835. https://doi.org/10.1080/030579....
19.
Friedrichsen, P. J., Van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358‒376. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
20.
Goodrum, D. H., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2002). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs: Canberra.
21.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
22.
Hammett, D. (2008). Disrespecting teacher: The decline in social standing of teachers in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 340‒347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijed....
23.
Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M.G. (1988). An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning. Science Education, 72(5), 597‒614. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.37....
24.
Ho, E., Holmes, P., & Cooper, J. (2004). Review and evaluation of international literature on managing cultural diversity in the classroom. Prepared for the Ministry of Education and Education New Zealand. University of Waikato.
25.
Johnson, S. D. (1995). Will our research hold up under scrutiny? Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 32(3), 3‒6.
26.
Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067‒1104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Kellner, E., Gullberg, A., Attorps, I., Thorẽn, I., & Tӓrneberg, R. (2011). Prospective teachers’ initial conceptions about pupils’ difficulties in science and mathematics: A potential resource in teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 843‒866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
28.
Lantz, O., & Kass, H. (1987). Chemistry teachers’ functional paradigms. Science Education 71(1), 117‒134. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.37....
29.
Laplante, B. (1997). Teachers’ beliefs and instructional strategies in science: Pushing analysis further. Science Education, 81, 277‒294. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...<277::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-A.
30.
Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2008). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38(2002), 115‒142. https://doi.org/10.1080/030572....
31.
Lee, O., & Luyks, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
32.
Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105, 913‒945. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9....
33.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. S., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95‒132). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
34.
Mansour, N. (2010). Impact of the knowledge and beliefs of Egyptian science teachers in integrating an STS based curriculum: A socio-cultural perspective. Journal of Science Education, 21, 513‒534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972....
35.
Masondo, G. (2013). The race connections in South African Education. Naptosa Insight, 7(2), 14–16.
36.
Mavuru, L., & Ramnarain, U., (2017). Teachers’ knowledge and views on the use of learners’ socio-cultural background in teaching natural sciences in Grade 9 township classes. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 176‒186. https://doi.org/10.1080/181172....
37.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education. A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
38.
Mensah, F. M. (2011). A case for culturally relevant teaching in science education and lessons learned or teacher education. The Journal of Negro Education, 80(3), 296‒309.
39.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Meyer, X., & Crawford, B. A. (2011). Teaching science as a cultural way of knowing: Merging authentic inquiry nature of science, and multicultural strategies. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(3), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422....
41.
Odora-Hoppers, C. A. (2001). Indigenous knowledge systems and academic institutions in South Africa. Perspectives in Education, 19(1), 73–85.
42.
Onwu, G., & Stoffels, N. (2005). Instructional functions in large, under-resourced science classes: Perspectives of South African teachers. Perspectives in Education, 23, 79–91.
43.
Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465....
44.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
45.
Prinsloo, E. (2005). Socio-economic barriers to learning in contemporary society. In E. Landsberg, D. Kruger & N. Nel (eds.), Addressing barriers to learning: A South African perspective. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
46.
Ramnarain, U., & Schuster, D. (2014). The pedagogical orientations of South African physical sciences teachers towards inquiry or direct instructional approaches. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 627–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
47.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
49.
Sarrason, S. B. (1996). Revisiting “The culture of the school and the problem of change.” New York: Teachers College Press.
50.
Savinainen, A., & Scott, P. (2002). The force concept inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning. Physics Education, 37(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9....
51.
Sawada, D., Piburn, M., Falconer, K., Turley, J., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2000). Arizona collaborative for excellence in the preparation of teachers. Technical Report No. IN00. Phoenix: Arizona State University.
52.
Smith, L. K. (2005). The impact of early life history on teachers’ beliefs: In-school and out-of school experiences as learners and knowers of science. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11, 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406....
53.
Smith, L. K., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 45–77. https://doi.org/10.3102/009173....
54.
Suh, Y. (2005). Pedagogical content knowledge development in teaching science: A case of an elementary school teacher in an urban classroom. Columbia, NY: Columbia University Press.
55.
Thomas, J. A., & Pedersen, J. E. (2003). Reforming elementary teacher preparation: What about extant teaching beliefs? School Science and Mathematics, 103, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949....
56.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first-year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0138....
57.
Upadhyay, R. B. (2005). Using students’ lived experiences in an urban science classroom: An elementary school teacher’s thinking. Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
58.
Weinstein, C. S. (1989). Teacher education students’ preconceptions of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248....
59.
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
60.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465....
61.
Wubbels, T. (1992). Taking account of student teachers’ preconceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-0....
62.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
