Reshaping technology-based projects and their exploration of creativity
More details
Hide details
Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, INDONESIA
Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan, Malang, INDONESIA
Publication date: 2023-01-07
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(1):em2217
This study explores how reshaping technology-based projects in learning designed using SAMR framework (substitution, augmentation, modification, redefinition) can influence students’ creativity. This research is a mixed method, combining quantitative data and qualitative data. The researcher analyzed the results of the students’ pretest and posttest scores and questionnaires and coded the interviews’ results. The research participants were 175 Indonesian students who took a hybrid learning class. This study uses the results of structural equation modeling to determine the contribution of technology to student creativity. The results showed that the most explored creativity indicator was flexibility and the least explored was elaboration. Based on the level of technology use in the SAMR framework, the modification level has the most influence on students’ creativity, while the substitution level has the least influence. Technology tends to be used as a substitute for traditional learning. Our research shows that the level of technology use in SAMR influences the level of creativity in students’ projects with varying impacts. This study concludes that integrating technology into learning in stages contributes to exploring students’ creativity and automatically increases their mastery of technology.
Ahmadi, S. D., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). Social software in the classroom: The case of wikis for scaffolding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 100-108.
Ahmed, I., & Chao, T. (2018). Assistive learning technologies for students with visual impairments: A critical rehumanizing review. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(3), 173-185.
Alzahrani, J. I., & Emsley, M. W. (2013). The impact of contractors’ attributes on construction project success: A post construction evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 313-322.
Apriwanda, W., & Hanri, C. (2022). Level of creative thinking among prospective chemistry teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Journal of Indonesian Science Education], 11(2), 296-302.
Ayu, H. D., & Sarwanto, S. (2019). Analysis of seismic signal in order to determine subsurface characteristics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1375, 012079.
Ayu, H. D., Jufriadi, A., Mustika, S. E., Kurniawati, M., Pratiwi, H. Y., Sundaygara, C., & Hudha, M. N. (2021). How to learn oscillation and wave in SAMR framework? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869, 012160.
Azid, N., & Md-Ali, R. (2020). The effect of the successful intelligence interactive module on Universiti Utara Malaysia students’ analytical, creative and practical thinking skills. South African Journal of Education, 40(3), 1-11.
Barker, R. (2019). Creatives talk technology: Exploring the role and influence of digital media in the creative process of advertising art directors and copywriters. Media Practice and Education, 20(3), 244-259.
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1-18.
Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research–A systematic review of recent trends. Computers and Education, 114, 255-273.
Canton, A., Torrents, C., Ric, A., & Guerrero, I. (2021). Exploratory behavior and the temporal structure of soccer small-sided games to evaluate creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal, 33(1), 16-25.
Capraro, M., Whitfield, J. G., Etchells, M. J., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). A companion to interdisciplinary STEM project based learning. Sense.
Chan, Z. C. Y. (2013). Critical thinking and creativity in nursing: Learners’ perspectives. Nurse Education Today, 33(5), 558-563.
Chien, Y. C., Liu, M. C., & Wu, T. T. (2020). Discussion-record-based prediction model for creativity education using clustering methods. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100650.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design. SAGE.
Cserháti, G., & Szabó, L. (2014). The relationship between success criteria and success factors in organizational event projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 613-624.
Cummings, J. B., & Blatherwict, M. L. (2017). Creative dimensions of teaching and learning in the 21st century. Sense.
Dwiyogo, W. D. (2018). Developing a blended learning-based method for problem-solving in capability learning. TOJET: Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 51-61.
Elastika, R. W., Sukono, & Dewanto, S. P. (2021). Analysis of factors affecting students’ mathematics learning difficulties using SEM as information for teaching improvement. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 281-300.
Ernawati, M. D. W., Sudarmin, S., Asrial, A., Muhammad, D., & Haryanto, H. (2022). Creative thinking of chemistry and chemistry education students in biochemistry learning through problem based learning with scaffolding strategy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Journal of Indonesian Science Education], 11(2), 282-295.
Genlott, A. A., Grönlund, Å., Viberg, O., & Andersson, A. (2021). Leading dissemination of digital, science-based innovation in school–a case study. Interactive Learning Environments.
Glaveanu, V. P., Ness, I. J., & de Saint Laurent, C. (2020). Creativity, learning and technology: Opportunities, challenges and new horizons. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 1-3.
Gube, M., & Lajoie, S. (2020). Adaptive expertise and creative thinking: A synthetic review and implications for practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100630.
Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H. P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1-16.
Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433-441.
Han, S., Yalvac, B., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76.
Hashimi, S. Al, Muwali, A. Al, & Zaki, Y. (2019). The effectiveness of social media and multimedia-based pedagogy in enhancing creativity among art, design, and digital media students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(21), 176-190.
Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 27-37.
Hernawan, A. H., Septiana, A. I., Rachman, I., Darmawan, D., & Kodama, Y. (2022). Environmental education in elementary school with Kamiholo: Kamishibai and hologram as teaching multimedia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Journal of Indonesian Science Education], 11(2), 229-236.
Hilton, J. T. (2016). A case study of the application of SAMR and TPACK for reflection on technology integration into two social studies classrooms. The Social Studies, 107(2), 68-73.
Hoffmann, J., Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2016). Creativity in the age of technology: Measuring the digital creativity of millennials. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 149-153.
Janthon, U., Songkram, N., & Koraneekij, P. (2015). Work-based blended learning and technological scaffolding system to enhance communication skills for caregivers under local administrative organization, Ministry of Interior, Thailand (part I). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 984-991.
Jude, L., Kajura, M., & Birevu, M. (2014). Adoption of the SAMR model to asses ICT pedagogical adoption: A Case of Makerere University. International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 4(2), 106-115.
Jufriadi, A., & Ayu, H. D. (2019). Investigation of resistivity for delineation aquifer layers and subsurface structures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1381, 012067.
Jufriadi, A., Ayu, H. D., & Pratiwi, H. Y. (2019). Developing e-scaffolding integrated with e- assessment to improve student’s mastery of concept. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (pp. 176-179).
Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., Patston, T., Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). The creative student in the eyes of a teacher: A cross-cultural study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100636.
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387-2404.
Ma, W. W. K., Kwan, R., Lee, G., Lam, J., & Au, O. (Eds.). (2013). Hybrid learning: Theory, application & practice. City University of Hong Kong & University of Toronto School of Continuing.
Martínez-Cerdá, J. F., Torrent-Sellens, J., & González-González, I. (2020). Socio-technical e-learning innovation and ways of learning in the ICT-space-time continuum to improve the employability skills of adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 105753.
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469-486.
Mbatha, B. (2013). Adoption of web-based technologies in pursuit of work productivity and creativity within the public sector in South Africa. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 18(3), 8.
Mihardi, S., Harahap, M. B., & Sani, R. A. (2013). The effect of project based learning model with KWL worksheet on student creative thinking process in physics problems. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(25), 188-200.
Nakano, T. C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2018). Creativity and innovation: Skills for the 21st century. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) [Psychology Studies (Campinas)], 35(3), 237-246.
Netolicka, J., & Simonova, I. (2017). SAMR model and bloom’s digital taxonomy applied in blended learning/teaching of general English and ESP. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (pp. 277-281).
Nissen, J. M., Talbot, R. M., Nasim Thompson, A., & Van Dusen, B. (2018). Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for analyzing gains on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10115.
Ogbonna, C. G., Ibezim, N. E., & Obi, C. A. (2019). Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word processing: An experimental approach. South African Journal of Education, 39(2), 1-15.
Onyango, G., & Gitonga, R. (2017). Exploring how technology complements constructivism using a lesson plan. In Proceedings of the 2017 IST-Africa Week Conference (pp. 1-11).
Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. Bloomsbury.
Pheeraphan, N. (2013). Enhancement of the 21st century skills for Thai higher education by integration of ICT in classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 365-373.
Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR and TPCK: A hands-on approach to classroom practice.
Rubenstein, L. D. V., Callan, G. L., Speirs Neumeister, K., & Ridgley, L. M. (2020). Finding the problem: How students approach problem identification. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100635.
Said-Metwaly, S., Kyndt, E., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2020). The factor structure of the verbal torrance test of creative thinking in an Arabic context: Classical test theory and multidimensional item response theory analyses. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100609.
Skains, R. L. (2018). Creative practice as research: Discourse on methodology. Media Practice and Education, 19(1), 82-97.
Sothayapetch, P., & Lavonen, J. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of primary school science teachers during the COVID-19 in Thailand and Finland. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(7), em2124.
Stein, S., Ware, J., Laboy, J., & Schaffer, H. E. (2013). Improving K-12 pedagogy via a cloud designed for education. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 235-241.
Such, B. (2022). Blended, active, and persistent: An investigative study of blended learning affordances for active learning and student persistence in university-level introductory science courses. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(2), em010.
Tan, J. C. L., & Chapman, A. (2016). Project-based learning for academically-able student. Sense.
Taylor, D. B., Handler, L. K., FitzPatrick, E., & Whittingham, C. E. (2020). The device in the room: Technology’s role in third grade literacy instruction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 515-533.
Trisnayanti, Y., Khoiri, A., Miterianifa, & Ayu, H. D. (2019). Development of Torrance test creativity thinking (TTCT) instrument in science learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194, 020129.
Tseng, J.-J. (2019). Do EFL teachers transform their teaching with iPads? A TPACK-SAMR approach. In C. N. Giannikas, E. Kakoulli Constantinou, S. Papadima-Sophocleous, & J.-J. Tseng (Eds.), Professional development in CALL: A selection of papers (pp. 71-85.
Wang, X.-H., Kim, T.-Y., & Lee, D.-R. (2016). Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3231-3239.
Welsh, K. E., Mauchline, A. L., Park, J. R., Whalley, W. B., & France, D. (2013). Enhancing fieldwork learning with technology: Practitioner’s perspectives. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(3), 399-415.
Wu, T. T., & Wu, Y. T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631.
Yen, T.-F. (2020). The performance of online teaching for flipped classroom based on COVID-19 aspect. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 8(3), 57-64.
Zhou, J., & Yao, X. (2017). Hybrid teaching–learning-based optimization of correlation-aware service composition in cloud manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing, 91, 3515-3533.