STEM technology-based model helps create an educational environment for developing students' technical and creative thinking
More details
Hide details
Department of Humanities, Dimitrovgrad Engineering-Technological Institute, Dimitrovgrad, RUSSIA
Department of Psychology and Human Capital Development, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RUSSIA
Department of Pedagogy and Medical Psychology, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, RUSSIA
Department of Advertising, Public Relations, and Design, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
Department of the English Language for Professional Activities, Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, RUSSIA
Department of Customs Law and Organization of Customs Affairs, Russian University of Transport, Moscow, RUSSIA
Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law, Moscow Region State University, Moscow, RUSSIA
Publication date: 2022-04-21
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(5):em2110
For successful technology adaptation today, individuals need not so much acquired experience and knowledge as certain personality traits in the form of skills, competencies, and abilities for collaborative problem solving, as well as achievement motivation and self-development. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a model for the formation of personality traits associated with the development of technical and creative thinking. The study was conducted using the modeling method and a psychodiagnostic approach based on the characteristics of creative thinking. An experimental study was conducted with a sample of 120 students from Plekhanov Russian College of Economics. The age range of the respondents was from 19 to 21 years. The results showed 1) the characteristics and dynamics of students' value systems and creative thinking, 2) a developed program for the development of intrinsic motivation, 3) a model for designing a pedagogical environment for students' engineering and creative thinking in education STEM; 4) testing the developed programs and models. The results also showed that there is a statistically significant relationship between the development of students' intrinsic motivation and the reorientation from normative-limited to creative-free thinking. Considering the results of this study, it was concluded that the model developed by the authors helped to shape and develop students' engineering and creative thinking. Implications for further research and teaching are drawn.
Aeschlimann, B., Herzog, W., & Makarova, E. (2016). How to foster students’ motivation in mathematics and science classes and promote students’ STEM career choice. A study in Swiss high schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 31-41.
Akiri, E., Tor, H. M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Teaching and assessment methods: STEM teachers’ perceptions and implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6), em1969.
Alsmadi, M. A. (2020). Requirements for application of the STEM approach as perceived by science, math and computer teachers and their attitudes towards it. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(9), em1879.
Andreeva, I. V., Mikhailik, E. V., Dobrynina, M. A. (2021). STEM education as a key factor in the development of engineering and technical competencies of students in educational institutions. The World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 9(1), 1-9.
Aniskin, V. N., Aniskin, S. V., Zamara, E. V., & Yankevich, O. A. (2019). Using the didactic potential of STEM and STEAM technologies in solving the problems of digitalization of education. In the collection: Higher Humanitarian Education of the 21st Century: Problems and Prospects. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 19-24).
Bahrum, S. & Wahid, N. & Ibrahim, N. (2017). Integration of STEM Education in Malaysia and Why to STEAM. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7, 646-654.
Banerjee, P. A. (2016). A longitudinal evaluation of the impact of STEM enrichment and enhancement activities in improving educational outcomes: Research protocol. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 1-11.
Bogdanova, A. N. (2018). STEM education at school in the context of industry 4.0. Science and education: problems, ideas, innovations, 6(9), 14-16.
Botnaru, D., Orvis, J., Langdon, J., Niemiec, Ch. P. & Landge Sh. M. (2021). Predicting final grades in STEM courses: A path analysis of academic motivation and course-related behavior using self-determination theory. Learning and Motivation, 74, 101723.
Chaika, S. A. (2017). Possibilities of the STEM approach in teaching natural sciences. Problems of modern science and education, 22(104), 74-77.
Chemenkov, V. N., & Krylov, D. A. (2015). STEM - a new approach to engineering education. Bulletin of the Mari State University, 5(20), 59-64.
Cortázar, C., Nussbaum, M., Harcha, J., Alvares, D., López, F., Goñi, J., & Cabezas, V. (2021). Promoting critical thinking in an online, project-based course. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106705.
Cover, R. (2021). Identity in the disrupted time of COVID-19: Performativity, crisis, mobility and ethics. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 4, 1-8.
De Meester, J., De Cock, M., Langie, G., & Dehaene, W. (2021). The process of designing integrated STEM learning materials: Case study towards an evidence-based model. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 10.
Dreessen, K., & Schepers, S. (2019). Foregrounding backstage activities for engaging children in a FabLab for STEM education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 20, 35-42.
Fagan, M. A., Hul, D. M., Gray, R. & Bolen, J. A. (2019). Predicting STEM performance in a Hispanic serving institution. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 18-24.
Farrell, L., & McHugh, L. (2020). Exploring the relationship between implicit and explicit gender-STEM bias and behavior among STEM students using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 142-152.
Ferguson, F. J., & Austin, E. J. (2011). The factor structures of the STEM and the STEU. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(6), 791-794.
Fong, C. J., Kremer, K. P., Cox, Ch.H.-T., & Lawson, Ch. A. (2021). Expectancy-value profiles in math and science: A person-centered approach to cross-domain motivation with academic and STEM-related outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101962.
Gafurov, I. R., Ibragimov, H. I., Kalimullin, A. M., & Alishev, T. B. (2020). Transformation of higher education during the pandemic: pain points. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii= Higher Education in Russia, 29(10), 101-112.
Glaveanu, V. P., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). Creativity, identity, and representation: Towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 12-21.
Good, J. J., Bourne, K. A., & Drake, R. G. (2020). The impact of classroom diversity philosophies on the STEM performance of undergraduate students of color. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 104026.
Grigoriev, S. G., Sadykova, A. R., & Kurnosenko, M. V. (2018). STEM-technologies in the preparation of masters of pedagogical direction. Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series: Informatics and informatization of education, 3(45), 8-13.
Hashemi, N., Abu, M., Kashefi, H., Mokhtar, M., & Rahimi, K. (2015). Designing Learning Strategy to Improve Undergraduate Students’ Problem Solving in Derivatives and Integrals: A Conceptual Framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11, 227-238.
He, X., Li, T., Turel, O., Kuang, Y., Zhao, H., & Hea, Q. (2021). The impact of STEM education on mathematical development in children aged 5-6 years. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101795.
Jeng, Hi-L., & Liu, G.-F. (2016). Test interactivity is promising in promoting gender equity in females' pursuit of STEM careers. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 201-208.
Kareem, J., Thomas, R. S., & Nandini, V. S. (2022). A conceptual model of teaching efficacy and beliefs, teaching outcome expectancy, student technology use, student engagement, and 21st-century learning attitudes: A STEM education study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2282.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. IJ STEM Ed, 3, 11.
Kelly, G. A. (1963). A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. W.W. Norton and Company. p. 190.
Konyushenko, S. M., Petrushenkov, A. V., & Zhukova, M. S. (2017). STEM approach in education: Russian and foreign educational practices. Proceedings of the Baltic State Academy of the Fishing Fleet: Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, 4(42), 96-101.
Kostina, I. B., & Gladkikh, Yu. P. (2019). The degree of effectiveness of the use of STEM technologies in the framework of the educational environment. Proceedings of the Baltic State Academy of the Fishing Fleet: Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, 3(49), 126-131.
Lazareva, S. A., & Marchuk, T. L. (2019). STEM-technology as a means of forming the engineering thinking of schoolchildren. Perm Pedagogical Journal, 10, 76-79.
León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156-163.
Loyalka, P., Liu, O. L., Li, G., Kardanova, E., Chirikov, I., Hu, S., Yu, N., Ma, L., Guo, F., Beteille, T., Tognatta, N., Gu, L., Ling, G., Federiakin, D., Wang, H., Khanna, S., Bhuradia, A., Shi, Z., & Li, Y. (2021). Skill levels and gains in university STEM education in China, India, Russia and the United States. Nat Hum Behav, 5(7), 892-904.
Luneva, E. V., Bobkova, N. D., Bryzgalova, O. N., Khripunova, O. G. (2020). Formation of professional value orientations of students. Alma mater (High School Bulletin), 8, 38-42.
Ma, Y. (2021). Reconceptualizing STEM Education in China as Praxis: A Curriculum Turn. Sustainability, 13(9), 4961.
Mackay, C. M. I., Cristoffanini, F., Wright, J. D., & Neufeld, S. D. (2021). Connection to nature and environmental activism: Politicized environmental identity mediates a relationship between identification with nature and observed environmental activist behavior. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 2, 1-10.
Marinyuk, A. A., & Serebrennikova, Yu. A. (2018). Preparing Future Primary School Teachers to Use STEM Education Resources. Proceedings of the Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 3. 37-41.
McIntyre, M. M., Gundlach, J. L., & Graziano, W. G. (2021). Liking guides learning: The role of interest in memory for STEM topics. Learning and Individual Differences, 85, 101960.
Merzlyakova, S. V., Golubeva, M. G., & Bibarsova, N. V. (2020). Dynamics of value orientations of boys and girls in the process of studying at a university. Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy, 6(74), 103-110.
Moè, A., Jansen, P., & Pietsch, S. (2018). Childhood preference for spatial toys. Gender differences and relationships with mental rotation in STEM and non-STEM students. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 108-115.
Murodkhodzhaeva, N. S., Averin, S. A., Romanova, M. A., & Serebrennikova, Yu. A. (2021). Continuity of preschool and primary school education by means of STEM education. Hominum, 2, 84-99.
Nourooz, H., Mohd, A., Hamidreza, K., Mahani, M., & Khadijeh, R. (2015). Designing Learning Strategy to Improve Undergraduate Students’ Problem Solving in Derivatives and Integrals: A Conceptual Framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11, 227-238.
Panyushkin, D. A. (2021). Review of practices and approaches in STEM education in Russia and abroad. Artemovsky readings. Materials of the XIII International Scientific Conference (pp. 157-164). Samara.
Park, J.-Y. & Nuntrakune, T. (2013). A conceptual framework for the cultural integration of cooperative learning: A Thai primary mathematics education perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 247-258.
Parks, M. B., Hendryx, E. P., & Taylor, A. T. (2021). The study of stream litter accumulation as a model for cross-disciplinary, transformative, affordable, and scalable undergraduate research experiences in STEM. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(3), e2245.
Pryor, B. W., Pryor, C. R., & Kang, R. (2016). Teachers’ thoughts on integrating STEM into social studies instruction: Beliefs, attitudes, and behavioral decisions. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 40(2), 123-136.
Purvis, A. J., Rodgers, H. M., & Beckingham, S. (2020). Experiences and perspectives of social media in learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 1-9.
Rikel, A. M. (2020). Perception of social maturity criteria, self-perception and value orientations among Russian millennials. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 17(3), 491-503. https://10.22363/2313-1683-202....
Robinson, K. A., Perez, T., Carmel, J. H., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2019). Science identity development trajectories in a gateway college chemistry course: Predictors and relations to achievement and STEM pursuit. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 180-192.
Sabirova, F. M., & Deryagin A. V. (2018). The creation of junior schoolchildren’s interest in the experimental study of physical phenomena using the elements of the technology of problem-based. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.13), 150-154.
Sahagun, M. A., Moser, R., Shomaker, J., & Fortier, J. (2021). Developing a growth-mindset pedagogy for higher education and testing its efficacy. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 4, 1-9.
Sakellariou, Ch., & Fang, Zh. (2021). Self-efficacy and interest in STEM subjects as predictors of the STEM gender gap in the US: The role of unobserved heterogeneity. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101821.
Salakhova, V. B., Masalimova, A. R., Belyakova, N. V., Morozova, N. S., Osipova, N. V., & Prokopyev, A. I. (2021). Competitive teacher for higher education: Risk-based models of its development. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(10), em2021.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and social psychology, 103, 663-688.
Shaidullina, A. R., Zakirova, V. G., Kashurnikov, S. N., Arestova, E. N., Shmidt, A. N., & Kovaleva, N. I. (2018). Students training for innovative entrepreneurial activity: social responsibility competences. Espacios, 39(02), 15-26.
Shmeleva, Zh. N. (2020). The use of heuristic teaching methods in the study of the discipline “marketing” to increase the creative thinking level in students of secondary professional education. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 9(3), 208-212.
Steinberg, M., & Diekman, A. B. (2018). Considering “why” to engage in STEM activities elevates communal content of STEM affordances. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 107-114.
Stratton, D. H. (2021). Negative transfer in implicit differentiation. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2(2), 100051.
Tavukcu, T., Kalimullin, A., Litvinov, A., Shindryaeva, N., Abraukhova, V., & Abdikeev, N. (2020). Analysis of articles on education and instructional technologies (Scopus). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(23), 108-120.
Tunick, E. E. (2003). Modified Williams creative tests. St. Petersburg: Rech, 96 p.
Vanykina, G. V., & Sundukova, T. O. (2020). Educational robotics in educational institutions: an empirical study of motivation and STEM skills. Pedagogika Informatiki, 3, 1-10.
Vershinina, T. S., & Ilyushkina, M. Y. (2020). Social practices of advertising disclosure: influence of stylistic expressive means of forming value orientations. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 3(23), 94-101.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, p. 159.
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304-340.
Zubenko, N. Yu., & Sukhova, E. I. (2018). Features of building a STEM module "Designing educational programs for preschool education" for bachelors in the direction of training "Pedagogical education". Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy, 11(55), 76-80.