RESEARCH PAPER
Students Conception of Voltage and Resistance Concepts after Conventional Instruction
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
PhD Candidate, Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, ETHIOPIA
 
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, ETHIOPIA
 
 
Online publication date: 2018-05-12
 
 
Publication date: 2018-05-12
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(7):3021-3033
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to determine the level of conceptions reached by students’ who learnt the concepts of voltage and resistance with the conventional direct instruction. To answer the research questions, descriptive non-experimental research design was used. A two tier test on the concepts of voltage and resistance was administered to 49 physics and chemistry major first year students in Medda Walabu University, Ethiopia. Students’ responses to the five items were qualitatively compared to those found in literature for secondary school and university students. The result showed that the conception of students formed at school level about voltage and resistance were not that much affected even by learning the same concepts at advanced levels and with mathematical rigor at university. Besides, the analysis revealed that students hold multiple opposing ideas regarding the same concept, which contradicts the classical conceptual change perspective. Further, the average conception level reached by the students after learning university level physics courses was “partial understanding”. Therefore, attending advanced but traditional course would not enhance students’ conceptual understanding. Hence, teachers should have to investigate students’ conceptions, as a first step, to subsequently design and implement appropriate instructional interventions.
 
REFERENCES (50)
1.
Adula, B., & Kasahun, M. (2010). Enactment of Student-Centered Approach in Teaching Mathematics and Natural Science: The Case of Selected General Secondary Schools in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 5(2), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesc.....
 
2.
Başer, M., & Geban, Ö. (2007). Effect of instruction based on conceptual change activities on students’ understanding of static electricity concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(2), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/026351....
 
3.
Bekalo, S. A., & Welford, A. G. (1999). Secondary pre-service teacher education in Ethiopia: its impact on teachers’ competence and confidence to teach practical work in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(12), 1293-1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
4.
Bilal, E., & Erol, M. (2009). Investigating students’ alternative conceptions of some electricity concepts. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 3(2), 193 – 201.
 
5.
Chee, C. T. (1996). Common misconceptions in frictional force among university physics students. Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 107-116.
 
6.
Cocstu, B., & Ayas, A. (2005). Evaporation in different liquids: secondary students’ conceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/026351....
 
7.
Dalaklioğlu, S., Demirci, N., & Şekercioğlu, A. (2015). Eleventh Grade Students’ Difficulties and Misconceptions about Energy and Momentum Concepts. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(1), 13 – 21.
 
8.
Dilber, R., Karaman, I., & Duzgun, B. (2009). High school students’ understanding of projectile motion concepts. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(3), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/138036....
 
9.
Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481 - 490. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
10.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science education, 25(6), 671 - 688. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
11.
Duit, R., Treagust, D. F., & Mansifield, H. (1996). Investigating students’ understanding as a prerequisite to improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit & B. J. Fraser (eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 1-14). New York: Teachers College Press.
 
12.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic and Social Learning Goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/009173....
 
13.
Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ Understanding of Direct Current Resistive Electrical Circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1614....
 
14.
Esayas, B. (1995). A look at problems of science Education in secondary schools. In IER (eds.), Proceedings of the National Work shop on strengthening Educational Research (pp. 110-115). Addis Ababa: Institute for Educational Research, Addis Ababa University.
 
15.
Federal Ministry of Education. (2015). Education Sector Development Program V (ESDP V):2008 - 2012 E.C. (2015/16 - 2019/20 G.C). Federal Ministry of Education, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
 
16.
Getinet, T. (2006). Causes of High Attrition among Physics PPC Students of Dilla College. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, 26, 53-66.
 
17.
Getinet, T. (2007). Students understanding of the basic concepts of Newtonian mechanics vis-a-vis lecture method. The Ethiopian Journal of Higher Education, 4, 23-35.
 
18.
Getinet, T. (2012). Effect of instructional interventions on students learning gains: An experimental research. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ., 6(2), 187-195.
 
19.
Gurel, D. K., Eryılmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
20.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1880....
 
21.
Kaltakçı, D., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Identifying Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Misconceptions with Three-Tier Test. In W. Kaminski & M. Michelini (eds.), Proceedings of selected papers of the GIREP - ICPE-MPTL International conference. Reims, France.
 
22.
Kim, E., & Pak, S. (2002). Students do not Overcome Conceptual Difficulties after Solving 1000 Traditional Problems. American Journal of Physics, 70(7), 759-765. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1484....
 
23.
Kock, Z., Taconis, R., Bolhuis, S., & Gravemeijer, K., (2015). Creating a Culture of Inquiry in the Classroom While Fostering an Understanding of Theoretical Concepts in Direct Current Electric Circuits: A Balanced Approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 45-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
24.
Kock, Z. J., Taconis, R. Bolhuis, S., & Gravemeijer, K. (2013). Some Key Issues in Creating Inquiry-Based Instructional Practices that Aim at the Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits. Research in Science Education, 43, 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
25.
Li, J., & Singh, C. (2016). Students’ Common Difficulties and Approaches While Solving Conceptual Problems with Non identical Light Bulbs in Series and Parallel. European Journal of Physics, 37, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0....
 
26.
Martin, R., Sexton, C., & Gerlovich, J. (2002) Teaching Science for all Children: Methods for Constructing Understanding. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
 
27.
Mekonnen, S. (2014). Problems Challenging the Academic Performance of Physics Students in Higher Governmental Institutions in the Case of Arbaminch, Wolayita Sodo, Hawassa and Dilla Universities. Natural Science, 6, 362-375. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.201....
 
28.
Osborne, R. (1985). Children’s own concepts. In W. Harlen (ed.), Primary Science: Taking the Plunge. London: Heinemann.
 
29.
Ozdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2007). An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 351-361.
 
30.
Ozkan, G., & Selcuk, G., (2015). The Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Texts and Context-Based Learning on Students’ Conceptual Achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(6), 753-763.
 
31.
Özkan, G., & Selçuk, G. (2012). How effective is “Conceptual Change Approach” in Teaching Physics? Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2(2), 182-190.
 
32.
Ross, K., Lakin, L., & Callaghan, P. (2000). Teaching secondary science. London: David Fulton Publishers.
 
33.
Semela, T. (2010). Who is joining physics and why? Factors influencing the choice of physics among Ethiopian University Students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(3), 319-340.
 
34.
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2008). Physics for Scientists and Engineers, With Modern Physics (7th Edition). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Brooks/Cole.
 
35.
Shibeshi, A., Mekonnen, D., Semela, T., & Endawoke, Y. (2009). Assessment of science education quality indicators in Addis Ababa, Bahir Dar, and Hawassa Universities. In A. Taye (Ed.), Quality of Higher Education in Ethiopian Public Higher Education Institutions (pp. 161-263). Addis Ababa: Forum for Social Studies.
 
36.
Singh, A. (2014). Emergence and Evolution of Learning Gaps across Countries: Panel Evidence from Ethiopia, India, Peru and Vietnam, Working Paper 124. Oxford, UK: Young Lives.
 
37.
Staver, J. R. (2007). Teaching science. Geneva: Educational Practices Series, The International Academy of Education (IAE) and the International Bureau of Education (UNESCO).
 
38.
Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edur....
 
39.
Taconis, R., & Kessels, U. (2009). How choosing science depends on students’ individual fit to ‘Science Culture’. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1115–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
40.
Tanel, Z., & Erol, M. (2008). Students’ Difficulties in Understanding the Concepts of Magnetic Field Strength, Magnetic Flux Density and Magnetization. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ., 2, 184 -191.
 
41.
Tarakçı, M., Hatipoğlu, S., Tekkaya, C., & Özden, M. Y. (1999). A Cross-Age Study of High School Students’ Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 84-93.
 
42.
Treagust, D. (1986). Evaluating students’ misconceptions by means of diagnostic multiple choice items. Research in Science Education, 16, 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0235....
 
43.
Treagust, D., & Duit, R. (2009). Multiple Perspectives of Conceptual Change in Science and the Challenges Ahead. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 32(2), 89-104.
 
44.
Treagust, D. F., & Haslam, F. (1986). Evaluating secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. Paper presented at the 59th annual meeting of the National Association for research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, California, March 28 – 31.
 
45.
Tsai, C.-C. (2003). Using a conflict map as an instructional tool to change student alternative conceptions in simple series electric-circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
46.
Urban-Woldron, H. (2013). Testing student conceptual understanding of electric circuits as a system. In C. P. Constantinou, N. Papadouris, & A. Hadjigeorgiou (Eds.), Proceedings of ESERA 2023, Strand 11 – Evaluation and assessment of student learning and development (pp.101-111). Retrieved from https://www.esera.org/media/eB....
 
47.
Vatansever, O. (2006). Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Instruction on Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions of Electric Field, Electric Potential and Electric Potential Energy at Tenth Grade Level (Unpublished MSc thesis), Middle East Technical University.
 
48.
Walker, J., Resnick, R., & Halliday, D. (2014). Fundamentals of Physics (Tenth edition.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
 
49.
Wang, J. (2004). Development and validation of a two-tier instrument to examine understanding of internal transport in plants and the human circulatory system. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 131 - 157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
50.
Woldeghebriel, H., & Tenaw, T. (2013). National Modular Curriculum for the Degree of Bachelor of Science (B.Sc) in Physics. Federal Ministry of Education, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top