RESEARCH PAPER
Teaching life sciences while integrating teachers’ and learners’ cultural belief systems
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Johannesburg, Gauteng, SOUTH AFRICA
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-11-26
 
 
Publication date: 2024-01-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(1):em2379
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The paper reports a study, which explored teachers’ perceptions and experiences on integration of cultural belief systems when teaching life sciences. Beliefs have been found to influence teachers’ pedagogical practices and ultimately impact on learning and understanding of concepts. These beliefs can be classified as originating from one’s religion or one’s culture. Life sciences is a subject that deals with real life issues hence has topics that challenge or impact on one’s belief systems. In a qualitative case study research design, 20 experienced life sciences (biology) teachers were purposively selected for the study. Each teacher was interviewed, and data was subjected to content analysis. Findings showed that though teachers strive to suppress their own belief systems in the classrooms, both teachers’ and learners’ beliefs need to be integrated when teaching certain topics. The practice enhances development of critical thinking skills and ultimately learner understanding. These findings allude to the need for teachers’ development in employing contextually relevant pedagogical strategies.
 
REFERENCES (44)
1.
Annuah-Mensah, J. (1998). Native science beliefs among Ghanaian students. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
2.
Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 713-770. https://doi.org/10.1017/S01405....
 
3.
Baxter, P. E., & Jack, S. M. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-....
 
4.
Bensley, D. A., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Powell, L. A. (2014). A new measure of psychological misconceptions: Relations with academic background, critical thinking, and acceptance of paranormal and pseudoscientific claims. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lind....
 
5.
Bering, J. (2011). The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. W. W. Norton.
 
6.
Cobern, W. W. (1994). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education [Paper presentation]. The National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
 
7.
Cochran-Smith, M. (1997). Knowledge, skills and experiences for teaching culturally diverse learners: A perspective for practicing teachers. In J. J. Irvine (Ed.), Critical knowledge for diverse teachers and learners (pp. 27-87). American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
 
8.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods approach (4th Edn.). Sage Publications.
 
9.
David, M. (2017). Principles of learning that works. College of Public Affairs and Development, University of the Philippines, Los Baños.
 
10.
Ebbenshade, D. (1993). Student perceptions about science and religion. The American Biology Teacher, 55(6), 334-338. https://doi.org/10.2307/444967....
 
11.
Eniayeju, P. (2010). Where is the STEM? Reflection on the missing content in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics instruction. In Proceedings of 51st Annual Conference of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria (pp. 3-7). HEBN Publishers.
 
12.
Hansson, S. O. (1996). Defining pseudoscience. Philosophia Naturalis, 33, 169-176.
 
13.
Hansson, S. O. (2017). Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 63, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shps....
 
14.
Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/978946....
 
15.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973....
 
16.
Keraro, F. N., & Okere, M. I. O. (2008). Cultural influences on the learning of science: An African perspective. In J. E. Larson (Ed.), Educational psychology (pp. 1-37). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
 
17.
Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of General Psychology, 10(4), 302-317. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2....
 
18.
Lambie, J. (2014). Open-mindedness, science, and religion. In J. Lambie (Ed.), How to be critically open-minded: A psychological and historical analysis (pp 198-206). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/978113....
 
19.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Socio-cultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2...<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R.
 
20.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1....
 
21.
Mansour, N. (2013). Science teachers’ cultural beliefs and diversities: A socio-cultural perspective to science education. In N. Mansour, & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Theory and practice, cultural studies of science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
22.
Martin-Hansen, L. M. (2008). First-year college students’ conflict with religion and science. Science Education, 17, 317-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
23.
Mattila, M., & Aaltio, I. (2006). From tools to social construction of organizational reality: Studying value dissemination in three case companies. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 11, 15-23.
 
24.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
 
25.
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently ... and why. The Free Press.
 
26.
Northover, S. B., & Cohen, A. B. (2017). Understanding Religion from cultural and biological perspectives. In J. M. Causadias, E. H. Telzer, & N. A. Gonzales (Eds.), The handbook of culture and biology (pp. 55-76). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111....
 
27.
Odhiambo, T. R. (1972): Understanding of science: The impact of the African view of the nature of science. In P. G. S. Gilbert, & M. N. Lovegrove (Eds.), Science education in Africa. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
 
28.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (1988). Adapting western science to traditional African culture. International Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
29.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (1998). Effects of science and technology on traditional beliefs and cultures. In M. B. Ogunniyi (Ed), Promoting public understanding of science and technology in Southern Africa. SSME, University of the Western Cape.
 
30.
Okafor, N. (2011). Cultural influence on science education: The dilemma of basic science students in Nigeria. MSTA Journal MSTA-MICH.ORG, 9-18.
 
31.
Packer, M. (1999). Interpretive research. http://www.mathcs.duq.edu/~pac....
 
32.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE.
 
33.
Ponterotto, J. G. (2005) Qualitative research in counselling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0....
 
34.
Pyysiainen, I. (2009). Supernatural agents: Why we believe in souls, gods, and buddhas. Oxford University Press. ttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001.
 
35.
Reiss, M. J. (2009). Imagining the world: The significance of religious worldviews for science education. Science & Education, 18, 783-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
36.
Reiss, M. J. (2013). Religion in science education. In N. Mansour, & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Cultural studies of science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
37.
Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Small-group interaction and gender. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001, 14185-14189. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-....
 
38.
Roth, W. M., & Alexander, T. (1997). The integration of students’ scientific and religious discourses: Two case studies. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 125-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
39.
Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1320-1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202....
 
40.
Shumba, O. (1995). Science teachers’ assessment of the interaction of indigenous African culture with science education in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 258-299.
 
41.
Taber, K. S. (2013). Conceptual frameworks, metaphysical commitments and worldviews: The challenge of reflecting the relationships between science and religion in science education. In N. Mansour, & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Cultural studies of science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
42.
Vygotsky, L. (1963). Thought and language. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-....
 
43.
Wilson, J. A. (2018). Reducing pseudoscientific and paranormal beliefs in university students through a course in science and critical thinking. Science & Education, 27, 183-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
44.
Zietsman, A., & Naidoo, S. (1997&. Girls’ understanding of concepts of thermal properties of matter. Nairobi Academy Press.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top