RESEARCH PAPER
The Impact of Pre-Service Teachers’ Orientation on the Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science Instruction
 
More details
Hide details
1
Illinois State University, USA
 
 
Publication date: 2021-10-05
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(11):em2028
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study is to investigate how pre-service elementary teachers’ orientation about science inquiry impacts their implementation of inquiry-based instruction. Teaching orientation is one of the levels of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) which impacts on teachers’ instructional practice. With thirty-one pre-service teachers, data are collected using a survey and three vignettes and are analyzed using a correlational coefficient. The results show that (a) there is a moderate relationship between pre-service teachers’ view of inquiry-based instruction and their willingness to implement it; (b) pre-service teachers’ confidence in implementing inquiry-based instruction increases as they gain experience with inquiry-based methods through coursework; (c) the participants favor using inquiry methods, but they feel more comfortable with a more teacher-centered approach. It implies that one science method course may not suffice to produce teachers who are self-efficacious about teaching inquiry-based science. Thus, they need additional instruction to implement a more student-centered inquiry approach.
 
REFERENCES (37)
1.
Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 31-54). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
2.
Bell, R.L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher 72(7), 30-33.
 
3.
Boesdorfer, S. B., & Lorsbach, A. (2014). PCK in action: Examining one chemistry teacher’s practice through the lens of her orientation toward science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2111-2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
4.
Chen, C., & She, H. (2015). The effectiveness of scientific inquiry with/without integration of scientific reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 1-20.
 
5.
Cobern, W., Schuster, D. G., Adams, B., Skjold, B. A., Zeynep, E. M., Bentz, A., & Sparks, K. (2014). Pedagogy of science teaching tests: Formative assessments of science teaching orientations. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2265-2288. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
6.
Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
 
7.
De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using practice models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947-964. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20....
 
8.
Feyzioglu, E. Y. (2015). Pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical orientations of science inquiry continuum. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6, 1-36. http://webb.deu.edu.tr/baed/gi....
 
9.
Friedrichsen, P. M., Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95, 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
 
10.
Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
 
11.
Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
 
12.
Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. School Review, 79, 171-212. https://doi.org/10.1086/442968.
 
13.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10....
 
14.
Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2011). Constructing CoRes—a strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41, 341-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
15.
Kind, V. (2016). Preservice science teachers’ science teaching orientation and beliefs about science. Science Education, 100(1), 122-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
 
16.
Klaiwong, K., Hewson, M. G., & Praphairaksit, N. (2011). Identifying pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in an undergraduate inquiry-based biology laboratory program. The International Journal of Learning, 17(12), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-....
 
17.
Lakin, J., & Wallace, C.S. (2015). Assessing teachers’ use of inquiry methods in the middle school science classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(2), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972....
 
18.
Lee, C. K., & Shea, M. (2016). An analysis of pre-service elementary teachers’ understanding of inquiry-based science teaching. Science Education International, 27(2), 217-237.
 
19.
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/978908....
 
20.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-....
 
21.
Marshall, J. M., & Alston, D. (2014). Effective, Sustained Inquiry-Based Instruction Promotes Higher Science Proficiency Among All Groups: A 5-Year Analysis. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(7), 807-821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972....
 
22.
McConney, A., Oliver, M., Woods-McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Inquiry, engagement, and literacy in science: A retrospective cross-national analysis using PISA 2006. Science Education, 98(6), 963-980. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
 
23.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
 
24.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications. Arizona State University Press.
 
25.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20....
 
26.
Miranda, R. R., & Damico, J. B. (2015). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices concerning inquiry-based instruction following a year-long RET-PLC program. Science Educator, 24(1), 23-35.
 
27.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
 
28.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide to teaching and learning. National Academy Press.
 
29.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
 
30.
Pilitsis, V., & Duncan, R. G. (2012). Changes in belief orientations of preservice teachers and their relation to inquiry activities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(8), 909-936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972....
 
31.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand; Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
32.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching; Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.....
 
33.
Taylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 6(1), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/875647....
 
34.
van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998).Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J.
 
35.
Walan, S., & Rundgren, S.C. (2015). Student responses to a context- and inquiry-based three-step teaching model. Teaching Science, 61(2), 33-39.
 
36.
Windschitl, M. (2008). What is Inquiry? A framework for thinking about authentic scientific practice in the classroom. In J. Luft, R. Bell, & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting (pp. 1-10). NSTA Press.
 
37.
Zervas, P., Sotirius, S., Tiemann, R., & Sampson, D. (2015). Assessing problem solving competence through inquiry-based teaching in school science education [Paper presentation]. 12th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (pp. 355-358). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fullt....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top