RESEARCH PAPER
The effect of the activity-based approach on grade 11 learners’ performance in solving two-dimensional trigonometric problems
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, SOUTH AFRICA
 
 
Publication date: 2022-08-27
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(10):em2155
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The study explored the effect of the activity-based approach (ABA) on grade 11 learners’ performance in solving two-dimensional (2D) trigonometric problems. A sequential explanatory design was used, starting with the quantitative, followed by the qualitative method. The experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG) were facilitated using ABA, while CG was taught using traditional teaching approach. A 2D trigonometry test was used as a pre- and post-test to measure learners’ performance. EG’s experiences of using ABA were captured through focus group interviews. The study findings reveal significant differences between EG and CG post-tests [t(100)=.3. 95; p=.05] with Cohen d=.79. Also, ABA did not segregate between boys and girls. Despite ABA being time-consuming, learners in EG developed collaborative skills, trigonometry vocabulary, the ability to solve trigonometric problems, and learning autonomy, which improved their performance. The study recommends ABA to improve learners’ performance.
 
REFERENCES (45)
1.
Barai, B. (2018). A study on effectiveness of learning physical science through activity-based methods at secondary level in Alipurduar district of West Bengal. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 6(1), 289-294. http://doi.one/10.1729/IJCRT.1....
 
2.
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ, 314(7080), 572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.31....
 
3.
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research, 42(4), 1758-1772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475....
 
4.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer.
 
5.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally & Company.
 
6.
Celik, H. C. (2018). The effects of activity-based learning on sixth grade students’ achievement and attitudes towards mathematics activities. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1963-1977.https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
7.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
8.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
 
9.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
 
10.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
 
11.
DBE. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement (CAPS) grades 10-12: Mathematics. Department of Basic Education.
 
12.
DBE. (2017). South African Schools Act (84/1996): Amended National Norms and Standards for School Funding. Government Gazette, 622(40818).
 
13.
DBE. (2020). National senior certificate-diagnostic report. Department of Basic Education.
 
14.
Deringol, Y., Ugurluel, M., & Eren, S. B. (2021). The effect of activity-based teaching approach on the attitudes of math-activities and their beliefs about mathematics of elementary school fourth graders. Acta Didactica Napocensia [Napocensia Didactic Act], 14(2), 284-298. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.1....
 
15.
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2013). An applied reference guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. SAGE.
 
16.
Emaikwu, S. O. (2012). Assessing the relative effectiveness of the three teaching methods in the measurement of students’ achievement in mathematics. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(4), 479-486. https://doi.org/10520/EJC12655....
 
17.
Estes, C. A. (2004). Promoting student-centred learning in experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(2), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382....
 
18.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
 
19.
Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940....
 
20.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
21.
Kagenyi, D. G. (2016). Pedagogical factors affecting the learning of trigonometry [Doctoral dissertation, Kenyatta University].
 
22.
Kaur, H., & Sankhian, A. (2017). Effect of activity-based method on achievement motivation and academic achievement in mathematics at secondary level. Educational Quest: An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 8(2), 475-480. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-7....
 
23.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2001). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. Social Analysis Selected Tools and Techniques, 36, 4-23.
 
24.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: evidence-based inquiry. Pearson.
 
25.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
 
26.
Mosese, N., & Ogbonnaya, U. I. (2021). GeoGebra and students’ learning achievement in trigonometric functions graphs representations and interpretations. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 827-846. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.....
 
27.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/978141....
 
28.
Ngcobo, A. Z., Madonsela, S. P., & Brijlall, D. (2019). The teaching and learning of trigonometry. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 72-91.
 
29.
Noreen, R., & Rana, A. M. K. (2019). Activity-based teaching versus traditional method of teaching in mathematics at elementary level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2), 145-159.
 
30.
Pokhrel, T. R. (2018). Activity-based mathematics instruction: Experiences in addressing the 21st-century skills. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.26711/00757....
 
31.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20....
 
32.
Radford, L. (2008). Connecting theories in mathematics education: Challenges and possibilities. ZDM, 40(2), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
33.
Regmi, K. (2012). A review of teaching methods--Lecturing and facilitation in higher education (HE): A summary of the published evidence. Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(3), 61-76.
 
34.
Serpe, A., & Frassia, M. G. (2021). Artefacts teach-math. the meaning construction of trigonometric functions. Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti-Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali [Proceedings of the Peloritana Academy of Pericolanti-Class of Physical, Mathematical and Natural Sciences], 99(S1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1478/AAPP.9....
 
35.
Simons, M. D., & Wibawa, K. A. (2021). An ethnomethodological analysis of students’ understanding of the concept of trigonometry in a high-stakes examination in South Africa. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika [Journal of Tadris Mathematics], 14(2), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.20414/betaj....
 
36.
Spangenberg, E. D. (2021). Manifesting of pedagogical content knowledge on trigonometry in teachers’ practice. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2....
 
37.
Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268-275. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.3....
 
38.
Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size-or why the p value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279-282. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D....
 
39.
Suter, W. N. (2011). Introduction to educational research: a critical thinking approach. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/978148....
 
40.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research. SAGE.
 
41.
Usman, A. N., Musta’ámal, A. H., & Muhammad, H. A. (2020). Effects of place-based and activity-based approaches in technical education, interest and retention. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5A), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.....
 
42.
Warfield, V. M. (2006). Invitation to didactique. http://www.math.washington.edu.
 
43.
Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., & Purnama, A. (2020a). Using Hawgent dynamic mathematic software in teaching trigonometry. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(10), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v....
 
44.
Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., Cunhua, L., & Zulfah, Z. (2020b). Using VBA learning media to improve students’ mathematical understanding ability. Journal On Education, 2(3), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v....
 
45.
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., & Alavi, H. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(5), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top