RESEARCH PAPER
Toward Understanding the Structure of the Historical Controversy: Atomic Models as an Exemplar
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Physics Education, Seoul National University, SOUTH KOREA
 
2
Department of Chemistry, Universidad de Oriente, VENEZUELA
 
 
Publication date: 2020-11-06
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2020;16(12):em1914
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Many researchers have suggested that incorporating history and philosophy of science in the science curriculum can be helpful for students’ understanding of scientific concepts and effective for developing their scientific thinking. Recently, in this context, there have been studies on historical controversies which show that history of science promotes debate and controversy and thus sustains students’ effort to understand what is being taught. However, existing studies have only searched and selected what the historical controversial issues exist and have not dealt with more practical issues such as how to use them in the classroom. In this study, for finding guide to teach controversial issues in history of science, we analyzed controversial issues related to the structure of the atom to understand their structure by using the ‘framework of knowledge and belief’. As a result, it was confirmed that the structures of the historical controversies consisted of various forms from the conceptual level to the belief level. Finally, the implications related to the use of the result of this study in the classroom, and to science education research were discussed.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Archila, P. A., Molina, J., & de Mejía, A. T. (2020). Using historical scientific controversies to promote undergraduates’ argumentation. Science and Education, 29(3), 647-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
2.
Dickerson, R. E., Gray, H. B., Darensbourg, M. Y., & Darensbourg, D. J. (1984). Chemical principles (4th ed.). CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
 
3.
Garritz, A. (2013). Teaching the philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry through controversies. Science and Education, 22(7), 1787-1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
4.
Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a Philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.37....
 
5.
Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
 
6.
Jenkins, E. (1989). Why the history of science? In M. Shortland and A. Warwick (Eds.), Teaching the history of science. Basil Blackwell.
 
7.
Jones, B. F., Pierce, J., & Hunter, B. (1988-1989). Teaching students to construct graphic representations. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 20-25.
 
8.
Justi, R. & Mendonça, P. C. C. (2016). Discussion of the controversy concerning a historical event among pre-service teachers: Contributions to their knowledge about science, their argumentative skills, and reflections about their future teaching practice. Science and Education, 25(7-8), 795-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
9.
Kim, S. Y., & Irving, K. E. (2010). History of science as an instructional context: Student learning in genetics and nature of science. Science and Education, 19(2), 187-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
10.
Lee, G. & Yi, J. (2013). Where cognitive conflict arises from?: The structure of creating cognitive conflict. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 601-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
11.
Machamer, P., Pera, M., & Baltas, A. (2000). Scientific controversies: An introduction. In P. Machamer, M. Pera & A. Baltas (Eds.), Scientific controversies: Philosophical and historical perspectives (pp. 3-17). New York: Oxford University Press.
 
12.
Matthews, M. R. (2015). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science 20th anniversary revised and expanded edition. New York: Routledge.
 
13.
Nahum, K. (2001). Scientific controversies in teaching science: The case of Volta. Science and Education, 10(1-2), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008....
 
14.
Niaz, M. (1998). From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: A rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Science Education, 82(5), 527-552. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...<527::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-B.
 
15.
Niaz, M. (2009). Critical appraisal of physical science as a human enterprise: dynamics of scientific progress. Dordrecht: Springer.
 
16.
Niaz, M. & Coştu, B. (2009). Presentation of atomic structure in Turkish general chemistry textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1039/B91450....
 
17.
Niaz, M. (2010). Are we teaching science as practiced by scientists? American Journal of Physics, 78(1), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3238....
 
18.
Niaz, M. & Rodríguez, M. A. (2002). Improving learning by discussing controversies in 20th century physics. Physics Education, 37(1), 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9....
 
19.
Niaz, M., Kwon, S., Kim, N., & Lee, G. (2013). Do general physics textbooks discuss scientists’ ideas about atomic structure? A Case in Korea. Physics Education, 48(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9....
 
20.
Rodríguez, M. A. & Niaz, M. (2004). A reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for general physics textbooks: A history and philosophy of science perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST....
 
21.
Sequeira, M., & Leite, L. (1991). Alternative conceptions and history of science in physics teacher education. Science Education, 75(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.37....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top