RESEARCH PAPER
User acceptance and adoption dynamics of ChatGPT in educational settings
 
More details
Hide details
1
John Abbott College, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, CANADA
 
2
Cerence Inc., Montreal, CANADA
 
3
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, CANADA
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-01-25
 
 
Publication date: 2024-02-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(2):em2393
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Recent developments in natural language understanding have sparked a great amount of interest in the large language models such as ChatGPT that contain billions of parameters and are trained for thousands of hours on all the textual data of the internet. ChatGPT has received immense attention because it has widespread applications, which it is able to do out-of-the-box, with no prior training or fine-tuning. These models show emergent skill and can perform virtually any textual task and provide glimmers, or “sparks”, of artificial general intelligence, in the form of a general problem solver as envisioned by Newell and Simon in the early days of artificial intelligence research. Researchers are now exploring the opportunities of ChatGPT in education. Yet, the factors influencing and driving users’ acceptance of ChatGPT remains largely unexplored. This study investigates users’ (n=138) acceptance of ChatGPT. We test a structural model developed using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model. The study reveals that performance expectancy is related to behavioral intention, which in turn is related to ChatGPT use. Findings are discussed within the context of mass adoption and the challenges and opportunities for teaching and learning. The findings provide empirical grounding to support understanding of technology acceptance decisions through the lens of students’ use of ChatGPT and further document the influence of situational factors on technology acceptance more broadly. This research contributes to body of knowledge and facilitates future research on digital innovation acceptance and use.
 
REFERENCES (34)
1.
Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2023). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/104948....
 
2.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00319....
 
3.
Bazelais, P., Doleck, T., & Lemay, D. J. (2018). Investigating the predictive power of TAM: A case study of CEGEP students’ intentions to use online learning technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
4.
Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., & Doleck, T. (2016). How does grit impact college students’ academic achievement in science? European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.30935/scima....
 
5.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
 
6.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
7.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
 
8.
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., & Lemay, D. J. (2017a). Examining CEGEP students’ acceptance of CBLEs: A test of acceptance models. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2523-2543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
9.
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, & Baznet, R. B. (2017b). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: Exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4, 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692....
 
10.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., …, & Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin....
 
11.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796....
 
12.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/315131....
 
13.
Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., Zaefarian, G., & Cartwright, S. (2023). Improving PLS-SEM use for business marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indm....
 
14.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-0....
 
15.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., …, & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? on opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lind....
 
16.
Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., & Ndjambou, P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model: Eleven years later. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 33(2), 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1....
 
17.
Kock, N. (2022a). WarpPLS. https://www.scriptwarp.com/war....
 
18.
Kock, N. (2022b). WarpPLS 8.0 user manual. ScripWarp Systems. https://www.scriptwarp.com/war....
 
19.
Lee, H. (2023). The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.22....
 
20.
Lemay, D. J., Doleck, T., & Bazelais, P. (2019). Context and technology use: Opportunities and challenges of the situated perspective in technology acceptance research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 2450-2465. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.1....
 
21.
Maruping, L., Bala, H., Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. (2016). Going beyond intention: Integrating behavioral expectation into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 623-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23....
 
22.
Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials and limitations. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chba....
 
23.
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsc....
 
24.
Microsoft Research. (2023). Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv....
 
25.
Newell, A. & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
 
26.
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT. OpenAI Help Center. https://help.openai.com/en/col....
 
27.
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotc....
 
28.
Reuters. (2023). ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base–Analyst note. https://www.reuters.com/techno....
 
29.
Stringer, A., & Wiggers, K. (2023). ChatGPT: Everything you need to know about the AI-powered chatbot. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2023/05....
 
30.
Teo, T., Doleck, T., & Bazelais, P. (2018). The role of attachment in Facebook usage: A study of Canadian college students. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 256-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/104948....
 
31.
Teo, T., Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., & Lemay, D. J. (2019). Exploring the drivers of technology use: A study of Nepali high school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 495-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423....
 
32.
van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: Five priorities for Research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586....
 
33.
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., &Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv....
 
34.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/300365....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top