RESEARCH PAPER
Using Interactive Technology to Develop Preservice Teachers’ STEAM Competencies in Early Childhood Education Program
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Education Studies, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
 
 
Publication date: 2022-02-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(2):em2079
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Using interactive technology leads to an interactive learning environment where learners develop their STEAM competencies, including critical thinking, collaboration, communication, creativity and innovation, self-direction, connection, and the use of interactive technology tools effectively. This research aims to investigate the use of interactive technology in developing preservice teachers’ STEAM competencies. The participants were preservice teachers (n=80) in an early childhood education program at a Federal University in the United Arab Emirates. An explanatory sequential mixed-method approach used quantitative analysis (quasi-experiment) followed by a qualitative approach (a focus group discussion was conducted). An online survey was used to collect the quantitative data from the participants before the semester started. It was sent again to participants at the end of the semester. The focus group discussions were used to collect the data from selected participants from the experimental group (n=18). The study results reveal a significant positive impact on the development of preservice teachers’ STEAM competencies after using the interactive technology.
 
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Abykanova, B. Nugumanova, S. Yelezhanova, S. Kabylkhamit, Z., & Sabirova, Z. (2016). The use of interactive learning technology in institutions of higher learning. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(18), 12528-12539.
 
2.
Bowen, G., Gordon, N., & Chojnacki, M. (2017). Advocacy through social media: Exploring student engagement in addressing social issues. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21(3), 5-30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1156....
 
3.
Capone, R., & Leopre, M. (2021). From distance learning to integrated digital learning: A fuzzy cognitive analysis focused on engagement, motivation, and participation during COVID‐19 pandemic. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758....
 
4.
Chai, C. S., Rahmawati, Y., & Jong, M. S. (2020). Indonesian science, mathematics, and engineering preservice teachers’ experiences in STEM-TPACK design-based learning. Sustainability, 12(21), 9050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1221....
 
5.
Daniela, L. Visvizi, A., Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., & Lytras, M. (2018). Sustainable higher education and technology-enhanced learning (TEL). Sustainability, 10(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1011....
 
6.
Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. (2017). Interdisciplinary assessment in the 21st century. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 21(1), 1096-1453. http://www.rapidintellect.com/....
 
7.
El Sayary, A. M. A. (2014). The effectiveness of problem-based learning strategy in STEM education for enhancing students’ 21st century skills. The British University in Dubai (BUID) Digital Repository.
 
8.
García-Sanz, M. P., & Morillas, L. R. (2011). La planificación de evaluación de competencias en educación superior [Competency assessment planning in higher education]. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado [Interuniversity Electronic Journal of Teacher Training], 14(1), 113-124. http://www.aufop.com/aufop/upl....
 
9.
Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-....
 
10.
Handal, B., Campbell, C., Cavanagh, M., Petocz, P., & Kelly, N. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 22-40.
 
11.
Hirsh, R. A., & Baronak, K. (2020). Empowering early childhood pre-service teachers with tech fluency. Creative Education, 11, 2730-2748. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.202....
 
12.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method. SAGE.
 
13.
Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48, 185-204. https://doi:10.1016/j.compedu.....
 
14.
Meda, L., & ElSayary, A. (2021). Establishing social, cognitive and teacher presences during emergency remote teaching: Reflections of certified online instructors in the United Arab Emirates. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(4), ep318. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedte....
 
15.
Mezirow, J. (2009). An overview on transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists...in their own words (pp. 90-105). Routledge.
 
16.
Mirete, A. B., Maquilon, J. J., Mirete, L., & Rodriguez, R. A. (2020). Digital competence and university teachers’ conceptions about teaching. A structural causal model. Sustainability, 12(12), 2842. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1212....
 
17.
Mohebi, L. (2018). Investigating perceptions of pre-service teachers and instructors about TPACK capabilities of pre-service teachers: An explanatory study among selected UAE universities [PhD thesis, The British University in Dubai (BUiD)]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3....
 
18.
Perronoud, P. (2004). Diez nuevas competencias a enseñar [Ten new skills to teach]. Magisterio Editorial.
 
19.
Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/088865....
 
20.
Rybakova, A., Shcheglova, A., Bogatov, D., & Alieva, L. (2021). Using interactive technologies and distance learning in sustainable education. E3S Web of Conferences, 250(07003), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scon....
 
21.
Scanlon, E., Anastopoulou, S., Conole, G., & Twiner, A. (2019). Interdisciplinary working methods: Reflections based on technology-enhanced learning (TEL). Frontiers in Education, 4, 134. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.....
 
22.
Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass.
 
23.
Schwab, K., & Zahidi, S. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/W....
 
24.
Soroka, O. (2018) The concept of “interactive technology” in educational science and practice. Azerbaijan Journal of Educational Studies, 685(4), 55-76. http://doi.org/10.32906/AJES/6....
 
25.
Stupina, S. B. (2009). Tekhnologii interaktivnogo obucheniya v vysshei shkole: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [Interactive learning technology in college: A teaching guide]. Science, p. 52.
 
26.
UAE Government. (2015). Science, technology and innovation policy in the United Arab Emirates. UAE Government.
 
27.
UAE National Committee on SDGs. (2017). UAE and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: Excellence in implementation. https://sustainabledevelopment....
 
28.
UAE Vision 2021. (2009). Vision 2021: United in ambition and determination. Abu Dhabi: United Arab Emirates. http://www.vision2021.ae.
 
29.
Yakman, G. (2010). STEAM: A framework for teaching across the disciplines. Virginia Polytechnic and State University.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top