A Case Study of Children’s Interaction Types and Learning Motivation in Small Group Project-Based Learning Activities in a Mathematics Classroom
More details
Hide details
Department of Elementary Education, Ewha Womans University, SOUTH KOREA
Publication date: 2021-12-12
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(12):em2051
As collaborative problem-solving skills are increasing in importance, Project-Based Learning (PBL) is being implemented in various ways, but the results differ depending on the participants. This study shows that the results of PBL depend on student interaction type and learning motivation. The difference in the levels of interaction and learning motivation between two groups of students utilizing different discussion processes was qualitatively explored. The participants in this study consisted of 8 students in the 6th grade of elementary school, and the intervention was conducted over the course of 10 lessons. The group for which the leader arbitrarily resolved conflicts had a type of inactive interaction and the level of motivation for learning was outside of the acceptable range compared to the group that took part in a democratic discussion. As the project progressed, it changed to a type of inactive interaction. Thus, the results suggest that the roles of individuals in a group should be adjusted to account for to the characteristics of PBL and the structure of the task; furthermore, an inquiry into how learning motivation changes according to social interactions with others should be conducted.
Anderson, T., Howe, C., Soden, R., Holliday, J., & Low, J. (2001). Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students. Instructional Science, 29, 1-32.
Barker, L. L., Wahlers, K. J., & Watson, K. W. (1987). Groups in process: An introduction to small group communication (3rd ed). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369-398.
Bong, M., Kim, E., Park, S. H., & Lee, M. J. (2011). Effects of the ARCS-based career experience program on motivation and career decision-making of college students. Korea Lifelong Education & HRD Institute, 7(4), 68-88.
Brophy, J. E. (1999). Teaching: educational practices series (Vol. 1). International academy of education & international bureau of education.
Evans, R., Friedman, J., McGrath, L., Myers, P., & Ruiz, A. (2018). Math path: encouraging female students in mathematics through project-based learning. PRIMUS, 28(4), 287-299.
Holmes, V. L., & Hwang, Y. (2014). Exploring the effects of project-based learning in secondary mathematics education. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 449-463.
Intel Innovation in Education (2013). Intel teach elements: Project-based approaches.
Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., Langrall, C. W., Mooney, E. S., & Putt, I. J. (2000). A framework for characterizing children’s statistical thinking. Mathe-matical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 269-307.
Jucks, R., Paechter, M., & Tatar, D. (2003). Learning and collaboration in online discourses. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research & Practice, 4, 117-146.
Kang, M. H., Park, M. S., Jung, J. Y., & Park, H. J. (2009). The effect of interaction and learning presence on learning outcome in web-based project learning. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Informa-tion and Media, 15(2), 67-85.
Kang, M., Park, Y. J., Choi, S. Y., & Lee, S. J. (2018). The effects of PBL (Problem-Based Learning) on aca-demic resilience, learning flow, and academic motivation of nursing students. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 19(6), 291-298.
Kang, S. J. (2000). Concept learning strategy emphasizing social consensus during discussion: instructional effect and verbal interaction in small group discussion (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The arcs model. Springer.
Keller, J. M., & Song, S. H. (1999). Attractive teaching design: Attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfac-tion. Kyoyookbook.
Kim, J. H., Jeong, J. S., Park, K. T., & Jeong, J. W. (2005). The effects of STS instruction using arcs strategies on 5th graders learning motivation and scientific attitude. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 26(3), 175-182.
Kim, M. E., Kim, M. J., Oh, Y., & Jung, S. Y. (2020). The effect of online substitution class caused by coronavirus (COVID-19) on the learning moti-vation, instructor-learner interaction, and class satisfaction of nursing students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(17), 519-541.
Kim, M. H., & Kim, Y. S. (2015). An analysis of the verbal interaction patterns of science-gifted students in science inquiry activity. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 333-342.
Kim, M. K. (2018). Analysis of learner interaction patterns in team activities of project-based learning: Based on activity theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Kim, M. K., & Kim, H. W. (2011). A study on children’s statistical thinking based on survey activities. Journal of Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics, 13(1), 207-227.
Kim, S. H. (2014). A study on the contents constructing of talk for learning education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Kim, S., & Cho, K. (2018). The network centrality in collaborative interaction groups on group synergy and achievement. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 383-406.
Kim, Y. C., & Jeong, S. W. (2017). Qualitative inquiry Ⅴ: Data analysis. Academy Press.
Lee, H. J., & Kim, Y. T. (2001). Turn-taking characteristics of children with specific language impairment and normal children. Communication Sciences and Disorders, 6(2), 294-312.
Lee, J. H. (2019). The mediating effects of co-regulation in team project-based learning: Focusing on the relationships between self-efficacy for group work, shared mental model and satisfaction (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Lee, J. H., & Ha, J. (2016). Effects of academic self-efficacy, learning motivation, and learning strategy on academic achievement: Comparison of instructor-centered instruction and learner-centered instruction. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(5), 259-278.
Lee, S. Y., & Song, J. (2018). Academic motivation factors and learning and instructional strategies for increasing learners’ interaction in K-MOOC courses. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(3), 77-99.
Lim, K. Y., Heo, H., & Kim, Y. (2009). Team leaders’ interaction patterns in online team project. The Journal of Educational and Media, 15(4), 295-317.
MacKay, R. J., & Oldford, R. W. (2000). Scientific method, statistical method and the speed of light. Statistical Science, 15(3), 254-278.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Meyer, D. K., Turner, J. C, & Spencer, C. A. (1997). Challenge in a mathematics classroom: Student’s motivation and strategies in project-based learning. The Elementary school Journal, 97(5), 501-521.
Min, S. J. (2015). The effects the arcs model applied to math classes on motivation to learn and academic achievement of students at-risk for LD in elementary schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ewha Wo-mans University.
Ministry of Education (2020, September 5). After COVID-19, 10 policy tasks for future education transition (proposal).
OECD (2017). PISA 2015 results (Volume V). Collaborative problem solving.
Ok, S. (2009). The effects of learning, emphasizing social interaction on the metacognition and learning motive in elementary science students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Busan National University of Education, Busan, Korea.
Ryu, E. S., & Seo, M. S. (2014). The structural equation model analysis on e-PBL teaching-learning design model affecting the student outcome and the motivation factors through the medium of arcs model. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 27(3), 727-756.
Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group dynamics. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Shunk, D. H., Printrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Sim, H. Y., & Song, H. D. (2014). The effects of goal-oriented context on learning engagement and knowledge construction process in online discussion. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 777-803.
Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223-265.
Yeo, H. J., Kim, S. M., & Kim, Y. S. (2018). Exploring project-based physical education class experiences of elementary students. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(3), 973-993.
Yoo, D. Y. (2004). A study on disagreements in dispute (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Yoo, D. Y. (2014). Analysis of semantic network and communication status according to communication structure of science gifted students in small group activity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chongbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top