Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
LITERATURE REVIEW
A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of information and communication technologies in science education
1
Institute of Light Industry, Fashion and Design, Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, RUSSIA
2
Department of State Legal and Criminal Law Disciplines, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
3
Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, RUSSIA
4
Institute of Foreign Languages, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, RUSSIA
5
Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RUSSIA
Online publication date: 2023-09-07
Publication date: 2023-10-01
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(10):em2343
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Using information and communication technologies (ICTs) in science education is presented in this article along with a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Relevant articles are extracted using specific keywords related to ICT and science education from data in the Scopus Database. Data is then analyzed using various bibliometric markers such as publication citation and collaboration patterns. In this study you will find things like publication types, author keywords, author geography and journals. The bibliometric analysis aims to uncover the publishing pattern and trends at the intersection of science education and ICT. The results of this study show the growth of ICT-related research and innovation in science education during the previous ten years. The bibliometric examination uncovers a huge expansion in the quantity of distributions, showing a developing interest around here. In general, this article enhances our comprehension of the current state of ICT innovation and use in science education. The results can make it simpler for educators, researchers, and policymakers to grasp current trends and priority areas, making it simpler to develop effective ICT integration strategies for science education. Future research areas and their consequences for practice are also highlighted.
REFERENCES (49)
1.
Akhmedova, M. G., Ibragimov, G. I., Kryukova, N. I., Galchenko, N. A., Lutskovskaia, L. Y., Sizova, Z. M., & Minkin, M. R. (2023). Uncovering patterns and trends in online teaching and learning for STEM education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep444. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedte....
2.
Al Sultan, A., Henson Jr, H., & Lickteig, D. (2021). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate....
3.
Alkhabra, Y. A., Ibrahem, U. M., & Alkhabra, S. A. (2023). Augmented reality technology in enhancing learning retention and critical thinking according to STEAM program. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599....
4.
Al-Rsa’i, M. S. (2013). Promoting scientific literacy by using ICT in science teaching. International Education Studies, 6(9), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6....
5.
Altin, H., & Pedaste, M. (2013). Learning approaches to applying robotics in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(3), 365. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/....
6.
Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre‐service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 552-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.1....
7.
Barak, M. (2014). Closing the gap between attitudes and perceptions about ICT-enhanced learning among pre-service STEM teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
8.
Bayadilova-Altybayeva, A., Tektigul, Z., Sadykova, S., Akkenzhe, T. & Akmaral, O. (2023). Language symbols for conveying culture. XLinguae, 16(1), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.20....
9.
Biasutti, M. (2011). The student experience of a collaborative e-learning university module. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1865-1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
10.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmst....
11.
Burkett, V. C., & Smith, C. (2016). Simulated vs. hands-on laboratory position paper. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 20(9), 8-24.
12.
Capone, R. (2022). Blended learning and student-centered active learning environment: A case study with STEM undergraduate students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 210-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330....
13.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
14.
Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H., & Wiegand, C. (2017). Virtual laboratories in science education: Students’ motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 358-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/002192....
15.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0250....
16.
Estriegana, R., Medina-Merodio, J. A., & Barchino, R. (2019). Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers & Education, 135, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
17.
Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142, 103635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
18.
Gunawan, G., Suranti, N. M. Y., Nisrina, N., & Herayanti, L. (2018). Students’ problem-solving skill in physics teaching with virtual labs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 10-87. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte....
19.
Heradio, R., De La Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 98, 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
20.
Herodotou, C. (2018). Mobile games and science learning: A comparative study of 4 and 5 years old playing the game Angry Birds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.1....
21.
Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The impact of digital technology on learning: A summary for the Education Endowment Foundation. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED6121....
22.
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
23.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
24.
Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
25.
Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., & Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 668-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20....
26.
Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers’ professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
27.
Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Aksela, M., & Meisalo, V. (2009). Adoption of ICT in science education: A case study of communication channels in a teachers’ professional development project. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmst....
28.
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A. I. (2021). Gamification in science education. A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsc....
29.
Kamalova L. А., Gaifullina R., Umbetova M. Zh., Novgorodtseva I. V. (2022). Telehealth communication strategies of medical students in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Self Development, 17(3), 242-263. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.1....
30.
Kara, N. (2021). A systematic review of the use of serious games in science education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), ep295. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedte....
31.
Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21....
32.
Kennedy-Clark, S. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on using scenario-based virtual worlds in science education. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2224-2235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
33.
King, K. P. (2002). Educational technology professional development as transformative learning opportunities. Computers & Education, 39(3), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-....
34.
Lok, W. F., & Hamzah, M. (2021). Student experience of using mobile devices for learning chemistry. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 893-900. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere....
35.
Muñoz, K., Noguez, J., Mc Kevitt, P., Neri, L., Robledo-Rella, V., & Lunney, T. (2009). Adding features of educational games for teaching physics. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.20....
36.
Niyazova, A. Y., Chistyakov, A. A., Volosova, N. Y., Krokhina, J. A., Sokolova, N. L., & Chirkina, S. E. (2023). Evaluation of pre-service teachers’ digital skills and ICT competencies in context of the demands of the 21st century. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(3), e202337. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt....
37.
Palomares-Ruiz, A., Cebrián, A., López-Parra, E., & García-Toledano, E. (2020). ICT integration into science education and its relationship to the digital gender gap. Sustainability, 12(13), 5286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1213....
38.
Ranjan, A. K. A. S. H. (2017). Effect of virtual laboratory on development of concepts and skills in physics. International Journal of Technical Research & Science, 2(1), 15-21.
39.
Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
40.
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
41.
Taconis, R., Ferguson‐Hessler, M. G., & Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: An overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 442-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10....
42.
Tuysuz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37-53.
43.
Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
44.
Watters, J. J., & Diezmann, C. M. (2013). Models of community partnerships for fostering student interest and engagement in STEM. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 47-55.
45.
Webb, M. E. (2005). Affordances of ICT in science learning: implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705-735. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
46.
Wiseman, A. W., & Anderson, E. (2012). ICT-integrated education and national innovation systems in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Computers & Education, 59(2), 607-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
47.
Zaw, M. C. M., & Alpatova P. N. (2023). Ambiguity in the Russian terminology of the energy industry. XLinguae, 16(1), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.20....
48.
Zeng, J., Parks, S., & Shang, J. (2020). To learn scientifically, effectively, and enjoyably: A review of educational games. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.1....
49.
Zourmpakis, A. I., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Education of preschool and elementary teachers on the use of adaptive gamification in science education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
