LITERATURE REVIEW
Bibliometric review of articles related to context-based learning in science education
 
More details
Hide details
1
Kazan Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
 
2
Almetyevsk State Oil Institute, Almetyevsk, RUSSIA
 
3
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
4
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
5
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
6
Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-08-06
 
 
Publication date: 2023-09-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(9):em2330
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study provides a bibliometric study of publications on context-based learning in science education to give readers a better understanding of the current state of the field’s research. The major goal of this study is to provide bibliometric information on articles on context-based learning in science education published in periodicals listed in the Scopus Database between 2005 and 2023. A bibliometric analysis based on seven categories–number of articles and citations per year, most influential countries, most productive authors, most significant affiliations, funding institutions, and subject areas was performed on the information gathered from publications scanned and published within the study’s parameters. Network diagrams and bibliometric analyses were produced using the Scopus Database. The year in which the most articles were published is 2022. The top three most productive countries were the Netherlands, Germany, and Turkey, respectively. The number of citations to papers included in the Scopus Database grew steadily, reaching its peak in 2022 with 410 citations. Pilot, A., who published 13 times, was the most productive author on this subject. Most publications are affiliated with Universiteit Utrecht, Freudenthal Institute and Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. Horizon 2020 framework program was the top funding source in terms of articles published. Additionally, it was examined how the publications were distributed by subject. The publications’ respective topic areas were social sciences and computer sciences. This study offers a global view of context-based learning in science education as well as a vision for future research.
 
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Akcay, B. (2009). Problem-based learning in science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 28-38.
 
2.
Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Teaching thinking skills in context-based learning: Teachers’ challenges and assessment knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
 
3.
Balci, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(3), 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20....
 
4.
Baran, M., & Sozbilir, M. (2018). An application of context-and problem-based learning (C-PBL) into teaching thermodynamics. Research in Science Education, 48, 663-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
5.
Brown, J. C., & Crippen, K. J. (2016). Designing for culturally responsive science education through professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 470-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
6.
Cetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, O. (2017). Conceptual understanding of acids and bases concepts and motivation to learn chemistry. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/002206....
 
7.
Chowdhury, M. A. (2016). The integration of science-technology-society/science-technology-society-environment and socio-scientific-issues for effective science education and science teaching. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 19-38.
 
8.
De Putter-Smits, L. G. A., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2013). Mapping context-based learning environments: The construction of an instrument. Learning Environments Research, 16, 437-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984....
 
9.
Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Complex constructivism: A theoretical model of complexity and cognition. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 485-498.
 
10.
Fensham, P. J. (2009). Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context‐based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 884-896. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20....
 
11.
Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2005). Design‐based science and real‐world problem‐solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855-879. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
12.
Furberg, A., & Arnseth, H. C. (2009). Reconsidering conceptual change from a socio-cultural perspective: Analyzing students’ meaning making in genetics in collaborative learning activities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(1), 157-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422....
 
13.
Gebre, E., Saroyan, A., & Bracewell, R. (2014). Students’ engagement in technology rich classrooms and its relationship to professors’ conceptions of effective teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.1....
 
14.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
15.
Karakus, M., Ersozlu, A., & Clark, A. C. (2019). Augmented reality research in education: A bibliometric study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(10), em1755. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
16.
King, D., & Henderson, S. (2018). Context-based learning in the middle years: achieving resonance between the real-world field and environmental science concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1221-1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
17.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2...<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R.
 
18.
Lupión-Cobos, T., López-Castilla, R., & Blanco-López, Á. (2017). What do science teachers think about developing scientific competences through context-based teaching? A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 937-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
19.
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4....
 
20.
Nagarajan, S., & Overton, T. (2019). Promoting systems thinking using project-and problem-based learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2901-2909. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
 
21.
Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). “Chemie im kontext”: A symbiotic implementation of a context‐based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041-1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
22.
Patterson, E. A., Campbell, P. B., Busch-Vishniac, I., & Guillaume, D. W. (2011). The effect of context on student engagement in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(3), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/030437....
 
23.
Rodriguez, S., Allen, K., Harron, J., & Qadri, S. A. (2019). Making and the 5E learning cycle. The Science Teacher, 86(5), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst1....
 
24.
Schultz, M., Young, K., K. Gunning, T., & Harvey, M. L. (2022). Defining and measuring authentic assessment: A case study in the context of tertiary science. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/026029....
 
25.
Sevian, H., Dori, Y. J., & Parchmann, I. (2018). How does STEM context-based learning work: What we know and what we still do not know. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1095-1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
26.
Srinivasa, K. G., Kurni, M., & Saritha, K. (2022). Context-based learning. In K. G. Srinivasa, K. Saritha, & M. Kurni (Eds.), Learning, teaching, and assessment methods for contemporary learners: Pedagogy for the digital generation (pp. 87-115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98....
 
27.
Vaino, K., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2012). Stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation for learning chemistry through the use of context-based learning modules. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4), 410-419. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20....
 
28.
Valdmann, A., Rannikmae, M., & Holbrook, J. (2016). Determining the effectiveness of a CPD program for enhancing science teachers’ self-efficacy towards motivational context-based teaching. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 284. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/....
 
29.
van Dulmen, T. H. H., Visser, T. C., Pepin, B., & McKenney, S. (2022). Teacher and student engagement when using learning materials based on the context of cutting-edge chemistry research. Research in Science & Technological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/026351....
 
30.
Vogelzang, J., Admiraal, W. F., & van Driel, J. H. (2019). Scrum methodology as an effective scaffold to promote students’ learning and motivation in context-based secondary chemistry education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1783. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
31.
Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M., & Pilot, A. (2011). Classroom implementation of context‐based chemistry education by teachers: The relation between experiences of teachers and the design of materials. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1407-1432. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
32.
Vos, M. A., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M., & Pilot, A. (2010). Teachers implementing context-based teaching materials: A framework for case-analysis in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1039/C00546....
 
33.
Yilmaz, S. S., Yildirim, A., & Ilhan, N. (2022). Effects of the context-based learning approach on the teaching of chemical changes unit. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 218-241. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused....
 
34.
Yu, K. C., Fan, S. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2015). Enhancing students’ problem-solving skills through context-based learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 1377-1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
35.
Zhang, F., Wang, H., Bai, Y., & Zhang, H. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the landscape of problem-based learning research (1981-2021). Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top