ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics
More details
Hide details
Higher Colleges of Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Faculty of Education & Arts, Sohar University, Sohar, OMAN
Al-Huson University College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, JORDAN
King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAUDI ARABIA
Emirates College for Advanced Education, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Online publication date: 2023-05-15
Publication date: 2023-07-01
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(7):em2286
This study aims to examine the perspectives of various stakeholders, such as students and educators, on the use of artificial intelligence in teaching mathematics, specifically after the launch of ChatGPT. The study adopts a qualitative case study approach consisting of two stages: content analysis of interviews and investigation of user experience. The first stage of the study shows that ChatGPT is recognized for its improved math capabilities and ability to increase educational success by providing users with basic knowledge of mathematics and various topics. ChatGPT can offer comprehensive instruction and assistance in the study of geometry, and the public discourse on social media is generally positive, with enthusiasm for the use of ChatGPT in teaching mathematics and educational settings. However, there are also voices that approach using ChatGPT in educational settings with caution. In the second stage of the study, the investigation of user experiences through three educational scenarios revealed various issues. ChatGPT lacks a deep understanding of geometry and cannot effectively correct misconceptions. The accuracy and effectiveness of ChatGPT solutions may depend on the complexity of the equation, input data, and the instructions given to ChatGPT. ChatGPT is expected to become more efficient in resolving increasingly complex mathematical problems. The results of this investigation propose a number of avenues for research that ought to be explored in order to guarantee the secure and conscientious integration of chatbots, especially ChatGPT, into mathematics education and learning.
Abukmeil, M., Ferrari, S., Genovese, A., Piuri, V., & Scotti, F. (2021). A survey of unsupervised generative models for exploratory data analysis and representation learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(5), 1-40.
Ali, J., Shamsan, M., Hezam, T., & Mohammad, A. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: Teachers and students’ voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41-49.
Aljanabi, M. (2023). ChatGPT: Future directions and open possibilities. Mesopotamian Journal of Cybersecurity, 2023, 16-17.
Aljanabi, M., Ghazi, M., Ali1, A., & Abed, S. (2023). ChatGpt: Open possibilities. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, 4(1), 62-64.
Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. (2023). Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing, Cureus, 15(2), pe35179.
Arrabal Platero, P. (2022). Los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible y la inteligencia artificial en el proceso judicial [The sustainable development goals and artificial intelligence in the judicial process]. Tirant lo Blanch.
Beccari, M. N., & Oliveira, T. L. (2011). A philosophical approach about user experience methodology. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 13-22). Springer.
Bin-Hady, W., Al Kadi, A., Hazaea, A., & Ali, J. (2023). Exploring the dimensions of ChatGPT in English language learning: A global perspective.
Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). ChatGPT in physics education: A pilot study on easy-to-implement activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep430.
Bozkurt, A. (2022). Biased binaries. Postdigital Science and Education.
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv.
Crust, G. (2023). ChatGPT employability study skills and curriculum development.
Daqar, M., & Smoudy, A. (2019). The role of artificial intelligence on enhancing customer experience. International Review of Management and Marketing, 9(4), 22-28.
De Winter, J. (2023). Can ChatGPT pass high school exams on English language comprehension?
Deng, J., Lam, C., Wong, M., Sin, S., & Martins, R. (2019). Instantaneous power quality indices detection under frequency deviated environment. IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 13(8), 1111-1121.
Deng, J., Lam, C., Wong, M., Wang, L., Sin, S., & Martins, R. (2018). A power quality indexes measurement system platform with remote alarm notification. In Proceedings of the IECON 2018–44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (pp. 3461-3465).
El Fallahi, F., Ibenrissoul, A., & Adil, E. L. (2022). Does innovation play a role in the relationship between corporate social and financial performance? A systematic literature review. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 4(3), 315-334.
El-Azhari, K., Hilal, I., Daoudi, N., & Ajhoun, R. (2023). Chatbots in e-learning: Advantages and limitations. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Connected Objects and Systems.
Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93-99.
Firat, M. (2023). How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education?
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE.
Frieder, S., Pinchettil, L., Griffiths, R., Salvatori, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Petersen, P., Chevalier, A., & Berner, J. (2023). Mathematical capabilities of ChatGPT. arXiv.
García-Peñalvo, F., Vázquez-Ingelmo, A., García-Holgado, A., Sampedro-Gómez, J., Sánchez-Puente, A., Vicente-Palacios, V., Dorado-Diaz, P. I., & Sánchez, P. L. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence algorithms within the medical context for non-specialized users: The CARTIER-IA platform. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 6(6), 46-53.
Gui, J., Sun, Z., Wen, Y., Tao, D., & Ye, J. (2021). A review on generative adversarial networks: Algorithms, theory, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(4), 3313-3332.
Guo, B., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Jiang, M., Nie, J., Ding, Y., Yue, J., & Wu, Y. (2023). How close is ChatGPT to human experts? Comparison corpus, evaluation, and detection. arXiv.
Han, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining. Concepts and techniques. Morgan-Kaufmann.
Hidayat, R., Syed Zamri, S. N. A., Zulnaidi, H., Abdullah, M. F. N. L., & Adnan, M. (2021). The interrelationships between metacognition and modeling competency: The moderating role of the academic year. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1853-1866.
Hu, Y. H. (2022). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the online learning behaviors of university students in Taiwan. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 469-491.
Jyoti, R., & Kuppuswamy, R. (2022). Worldwide artificial intelligence software forecast, 2022-2026 (US49571222). IDC.
Lin, C., Huang, A., & Yang, S. (2023). Review of AI-driven conversational chatbots implementation methodologies and challenges (1999-2022). Sustainability, 15, 4012.
Minsky, M. (1998). Consciousness is a big suitcase. A talk with Marvin Minsky. Conversations at Edge.
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model].
Pardos, Z., & Bhandari, S. (2023). Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hints. arXiv.
Qu, J., Zhao, Y., & Xie, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence leads the reform of education models. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(3), 581-588.
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewed or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6, 1.
Shahriar, S., & Hayawi, K. (2023). Let’s have a chat! A conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, applications, and limitations. arXiv.
Shakarian, P., Koyyalamudi, A., Ngu, N., & Mareedu, L. (2023). An independent evaluation of ChatGPT on mathematical word problems. arXiv.
Singh, A., Tiwari, A. K., & Sharma, R. K. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) based educational tools: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(6), 3887-3919.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research: Perspective in practice. SAGE.
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv.
Tashtoush, M., Wardat, Y., & Elsayed, A. (2023). Mathematics distance learning and learning loss during COVID-19 pandemic: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(5), 162-174.
Tashtoush, M., Wardat, Y., Aloufi, F., & Taani, O. (2022a). The effect of a training program based on (TIMSS) to developing the levels of habits of mind and mathematical reasoning skills among pre-service mathematics teachers. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(11), em2182.
Tashtoush, M., Wardat, Y., Aloufi, F., & Taani, O. (2022b). The effectiveness of teaching method based on the components of concept-rich instruction approach in students achievement on linear algebra course and their attitudes towards. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(7), 41-57.
Tenhundfeld, N., & ChatGPT (2023). Two birds with one stone: Writing a paper entitled “ChatGPT as a tool for studying human-AI interaction in the wild” with ChatGPT.
Thorp, H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313-313.
Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253-258. 1547-5069.2001.00253.x.
Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, 236, 433-460.
von Hippel, P. T. (2023).ChatGPT is not ready to teach geometry (yet). Education Next.
Vose, J. M., Peterson, D. L., Fettig, C. J., Halofsky, J. E., Hiers, J. K., Keane, R. E., Loehman, R., & Stambaugh, M. C. (2021). Fire and forests in the 21st century: Managing resilience under changing climates and fire regimes in USA forests. In C. H. Greenberg, & B. Collins (Eds.), Fire ecology and management: Past, present, and future of US forested ecosystems (pp. 465-502). Springer.
Walker, C., & Noorden, R. (2023). What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature, 614(7947), 214-216.
Wang, L., Pang, Y., Lam, C., Deng, J., & Wong, M. (2018). Design and analysis of single-phase adaptive passive part coupling hybrid active power filter (HAPF). In Proceedings of the IECON 2018–44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (pp. 3615-3620). IEEE.
Wardat, Y., Belbase, S., Tairab, H., Takriti, R., Efstratopoulou, M., & Dodeen, H.(2023). The influence of students factors on students’ achievement on international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) in Abu Dhabi Emirate schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1561.
Xie, K., Sun, Y., & Liu, X. (2021). The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems in improving academic performance: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 161, 104017.
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE.
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4312418.
Zhang, B. (2023). Preparing educators and students for ChatGPT and AI technology in higher education: Benefits, limitations, strategies, and implications of ChatGPT & AI technologies.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top