RESEARCH PAPER
Serious Games in High School Mathematics Lessons: An Embedded Case Study in Europe
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mathematics, University of Salerno, ITALY
 
2
IIS “L. Da Vinci-Nitti”, Potenza, ITALY
 
 
Publication date: 2021-04-27
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(5):em1963
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In this article, we will describe the embedded case study of the European project “E-Magic” carried out within the Erasmus+ project and which involved 12-16 years old students and teachers from three nations: “Acharnes Special Education Vocational School” in Athens (Greece), IIS “L. Da Vinci-Nitti”, a high school in Potenza (Italy), and from Gabinete de Modernizao das Tecnologias Educativas (G.M.T.E.) in Madeira Islands (Portugal). The project is finalized to enhance Mathematical Competencies by Serious Games learning. We carried out both empirical qualitative and quantitative methods to highlight Serious Games’ effectiveness, as a teaching methodology, in motivating students to learn mathematics. We also hypothesize that prompting a strategic way of thinking within a didactical intervention by game-approach could improve students’ proving processes and support them in mathematical thinking production. Rabardel’s cognitive ergonomics and the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge model are the lenses for reading educational experiments’ data. Data seems to show that simulation helps students find alternative and creative solutions to problems. Therefore, Serious Games’ use in education promotes significant changes and mental resources activation.
 
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Arnab, S., Berta, R., Earp, J., De Freitas, S., Popescu, M., Romero, M., Popescu, M., Stefan, I. A., & Usart, M. (2012). Framing the adoption of serious games in formal education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(2), 159-171.
 
2.
Barbieri, G., Barbieri, R., & Capone, R. (2019). I serious games per una didattica della matematica inclusiva [Serious games for inclusive mathematics education]. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica, 2, 95-96.
 
3.
Bellotti, F., Berta, R., & De Gloria, A. (2010). Designing effective serious games: Opportunities and challenges for research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5(SI3), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v....
 
4.
Beutner, M., & Pechuel, R. (2018). Game-based learning for teachers-A journey through a world of new ideas. Game on Consortium and Ingenious Knowledge GmbH.
 
5.
Brom, C., Sisler, V., & Slavík, R. (2010). Implementing digital game-based learning in schools: augmented learning environment of `Europe 2045’. Multimedia Systems, 16(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530....
 
6.
Campos, H., & Moreira, R. (2016) Games as an educational resource in the teaching and learning of mathematics: an educational experiment in Portuguese middle schools, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(3), 463-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
7.
Capone, R., & Lepore, M. (2020). Augmented Reality to Increase Interaction and Participation: A Case Study of Undergraduate Students in Mathematics Class. In International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics (pp. 185-204). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
8.
Capone, R., Adesso, M. G., Del Regno, F., Lombardi, L., & Tortoriello, F. S. (2020, 14 February). Mathematical competencies: A case study on semiotic systems and argumentation in an Italian High School. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
9.
Capone, R., Del Regno, F., & Tortoriello, F. (2018). E-Teaching in mathematics education: The teacher’s role in online discussion. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 14(3), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-....
 
10.
Chen J. (2007), Flow in games (and everything else). Communications of the AMC-Association for Computing Machinery, 50(4), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/123274....
 
11.
Clark A. (2001). Mindware: An Introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. Oxford University Press.
 
12.
D’Amore, B., & Fandino Pinilla, M. I. (2007) How the sense of mathematical objects changes when their semiotic representations undergo treatment and conversion. La matematica e la sua didattica (Bologna, Italy), 21(1), 87-92.
 
13.
De Grove, F., Van Looy, J., & Courtois, C. (2010). Towards a serious game experience model: Validation, extension, and adaptation of the G.E.Q. for use in an educational context. In Playability and player experience (Vol. 10, pp. 47-61). Breda University of Applied Sciences.
 
14.
Devlin, K., Kill, K., & Multisilta, J. (2015). Editorial: Is game-based math learning finally coming of age? International Journal of Serious Games, 2(4), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.....
 
15.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think, a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (No. 370.15 D48).
 
16.
Easley, D., & Ghosh, A. (2016) Incentives, Gamification, and Game Theory: An Economic Approach to Badge Design. A.C.M. Transactions on Economics and Computation, 4(3), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1145/291057....
 
17.
Ferrarello, D., Gallo, G., Lombardo, M., Mammana, M. F., Pennisi, M., Stanco, F., & Viagrande, L. C. (2018). FunGo: un serious game per la matematica. A cura di: Marina Rui [FunGo: a serious math game. Curated by: Marina Rui]. In Proceedings della Multiconferenza EM&M ITALIA: Progress to work - Contesti, processi educativi e mediazioni tecnologiche (pp. 425-432). Genova University Press.
 
18.
Ferrarello, D., Mammana, M. F., & Pennisi, M. (2014). Teaching by doing. Proceedings of C.I.E.A.E.M. 2013: Q.R.D.M., 24(1), 429-433.
 
19.
Ferrarello, D., Mammana, M. F., Pennisi, M., & Taranto, E. (2017). Teaching intriguing geometric loci with D.G.S. Aldon, G., Hitt, F. Bazzini, L., Gellert, U. (Eds.): Mathematics and Technology. A C.I.E.A.E.M. Sourcebook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
20.
Ferrarello, D., Mammana, M. F., Pennisi, M., Taranto, E., & Turrisi, A. (2019). Serious Games in Teaching/Learning Mathematics: The Experience of FunGo. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Mathematics Education for the Future Project Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.37626/GA978....
 
21.
Forman, E. (1989). The role of peer interaction in the social construction of mathematical knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0....
 
22.
Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-....
 
23.
Kara, N. (2021). A Systematic Review of the Use of Serious Games in Science Education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), ep295. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedte....
 
24.
Kolb, B. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
 
25.
Matos, J. M. (2020). Construing Professional Knowledge of Secondary School Teachers of Mathematics: A Historical Perspective. Pedagogical Research, 5(3), em0058. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/78....
 
26.
Mishra, P., & Kohler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 8(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
 
27.
Ozudogru, M., & Ozudogru, F. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Mathematics Teachers and the Effect of Demographic Variables. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.5....
 
28.
Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology Integration Practice as a Function of Pedagogical Expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/088865....
 
29.
Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. A.C.M. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/950566....
 
30.
Rabardel P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains [Men and technologies; cognitive approach to contemporary instruments]. Armand Colin.
 
31.
Rabardel, P., & Samurçay, R. (2001, March). From artifact to instrument-mediated learning. In Symposium on New challenges to research on learning (pp. 21-23).
 
32.
Shaffer, D. W., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Before every child is left behind: How epistemic games can solve the coming crisis in education. WCER Working Paper No. 2005-7.
 
33.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
34.
Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., Bauer, M., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2009). Melding the Power of Serious Games and Embedded Assessment to Monitor and Foster Learning: Flow and Grow. In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.). Serious Games Mechanisms and Effects (pp. 295-321). Routledge.
 
35.
Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCAUSE review, 41(2), 16.
 
36.
Zyda, M. (2005). From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer, 38(9), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.200....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top