Life-Experiences of Female Students in Physics: The Outsiders Within
More details
Hide details
University of Groningen, NETHERLANDS
Publication date: 2021-06-19
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(7):em1983
The purpose of this multiple case study was to examine the kinds of experiences that were critical to the physics trajectories of four purposefully selected undergraduate female physics students in central Europe. The data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews and were analyzed following an inductive approach and a combination of open and in-vivo coding. The findings showed that: (a) all participants experienced a lack of sense of belonging in physics because of stereotypes and biases about the role of women in physics, which were evident both in classroom discourses and lack of recognition by their instructors and their male peers; (b) the intersection of gender and physics identity served as a barrier to the participants’ perceived recognition (by others) as competent physics persons as well as their sense of belonging in physics; and, (c) all participants pointed to the lack of role-models and specifically women of color in academia.
Archer, L., Moote, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Learning that physics is ‘not for me’: Pedagogic work and the cultivation of habitus among advanced level physics students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(3), 347-384.
Avraamidou, L. (2020). "I am a young immigrant woman doing physics and on top of that I am Muslim": Identities, intersections, and negotiations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 311-341.
Barthelemy, R., McCormick, M., & Henderson, C. (2016). Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020119.
Bettinger, E., & Long, B. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. The American Economic Review, 95(2), 152-157.
Blackburn, H. (2017). The status of women in stem in higher education: A review of the literature 2007-2017. Science & Technology Libraries, 36(3), 235-273.
Blickenstaff, J. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369-386.
Danielsson, A. (2012). Exploring woman university physics students ‘doing gender’ and ‘doing physics’. Gender and Education, 24(1), 25-39.
European Commission. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship. Directorate-General for Research and innovation, Science with and for Society.
Francis, B., Archer, L. Moote, J., DeWitt, J., MacLeod, E., & Yeomans, L. (2017). The construction of physics as a quintessentially masculine subject: Young people’s perceptions of gender issues in access to physics. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 76(3-4), 156-174.
Gonsalves, A. J., & Danielsson, A. (2020). Physics education and gender: Identity as an analytic lens for research. Springer.
González, D., Mateu, A., Pons, E., & Domínguez, M. (2017). Women scientists as decor: The image of scientists in Spanish press pictures. Science Communication, 39(4), 535-547.
Hazari, Z., & Cass, C. (2018). Towards meaningful physics recognition: What does this recognition look like? Physics Teacher, 56(7), 442-446.
Hazari, Z., Brewe, E., Goertzen, R., & Hodapp, T. (2017). The importance of high school physics teachers for female students’ physics identity and persistence. Physics Teacher, 55(2), 96-99.
Hazari, Z., Potvin, Gl., Lock, R.M., Lung, F., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P.M. (2013). Factors that affect the physical science career interest of female students: Testing five common hypotheses. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020115.
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P., & Shanahan, M. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978-1003.
Hyater-Adams, S., Fracchiolla, C., Williams, T., Finkelstein, N., & Hinki, K. (2019). Deconstructing Black physics identity: Linking individual and social constructs using the critical physics identity framework. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020115.
Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Singh, C. (2020). Damage caused by women’s lower self-efficacy on physics learning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010118.
Lederman, M., and Bartsch, I. (2001). The gender and science reader. Routledge.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Miller, D., Eagly, A., & Linn, M. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631-644.
Nehmeh, G., & Kelly, A. M. (2020). Facilitating the self-determination of undergraduate women in physics: the role of external validation. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-22.
Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of colour in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social problems, 52(4), 593-617.
Parson, L. (2018). An institutional ethnography of higher education: The experiences of undergraduate women majoring in math and physics. Journal of Etnographyic & Qualitative Research, 13, 18-33.
Rittmayer, A. D., & Beier, M. E. (2008). Overview: Self-efficacy in STEM. In B. Bogue & E. Cady (Eds.), Applying Research to Practice (ARP) Resources.
UNESCO. (2015). Unesco science report: Towards 2030. United National Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top