RESEARCH PAPER
Cognitive obstacles in the learning of complex number concepts: A case study of in-service undergraduate physics student-teachers in Zimbabwe
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, SOUTH AFRICA
 
 
Publication date: 2022-09-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(10):em2158
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Physics and mathematics are interrelated as part of the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. The learning of science is supported by mathematical skills and knowledge. The aim of this paper is to determine the cognitive obstacles of in-service undergraduate physics student-teachers’ understanding of the concept of complex numbers which is part of linear algebra. A case study is presented involving 10 undergraduate student-teachers at a university in Zimbabwe studying for a Bachelor of Science Education Honours Degree in physics. Data were generated from the 10 participants’ answers to structured activity sheets and interviews. Action, process, object, schema (APOS) theory was used to explore the possible ways that students may follow to understand the concepts of complex numbers and how they concur with the preliminary genetic decomposition. It was observed that most of the participants were operating at the action level, with a few operating at the process and object levels of understanding. Recommendations are made in this study that instructors should pay more attention to the prerequisite concepts and the “met afters” so that students can encapsulate processes into object understanding of division of complex numbers and polar form.
 
REFERENCES (55)
1.
Ahmad, A. W., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Improving post-secondary students’ algebraic skills in the learning of complex numbers. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(8), 273‑279.
 
2.
Anevska, K., Gogovska, V., & Malcheski, R. (2015). The role of complex numbers in interdisciplinary integration in mathematics teaching. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2573-2577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp....
 
3.
Anton, H. (2010). Elementary linear algebra. Wiley.
 
4.
Antwi, S. K., & Hamza, K. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), 217‑226.
 
5.
Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Fuentes, S. R., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory. A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
 
6.
Bansilal, S., Brijlall, D., & Trigueros, M. (2017). An APOS study on pre-service teachers’ understanding of injections and surjections. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
7.
Bertram, C., & Christiansen, I. (2014). Understanding research: An introduction to reading research. Van Schaik.
 
8.
Bogomolny, M. (2007). Raising students’ understanding: Linear algebra. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 65‑72).
 
9.
Borji, V., Erfani, H., & Font, V. (2020). A combined application of APOS and OSA to explore undergraduate students’ understanding of polar coordinates. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(3), 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
10.
Brijlall, D. (2015). Innovative pedagogy: Implications of genetic decompositions for problem solving in management courses. Nitte Management Review, 23-31.
 
11.
Chauraya, M., & Brodie, K. (2018). Conversation in a professional learning community: An analysis of teacher learning opportunities in mathematics. Pythagoras, 39(1), a363. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythag....
 
12.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Surveys, longitudinal, cross sectional and trend studies. Routledge.
 
13.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. SAGE.
 
14.
De Lima, R. N., & Tall, D. (2008). Procedural embodiment and magic in linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
15.
DeVries, D., & Arnon, I. (2004). Solution–What does it mean? Helping linear algebra students develop the concept while improving research tools. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 55-62).
 
16.
Dorier, J. L., & Sierpinska, A. (2001). Research into the teaching and learning of linear algebra. In D. Holton, M. Artigue, U. Kirchgräber, J. Hillel, M. Niss, & A. Schoenfield (Eds.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 255-273). Springer.
 
17.
Dubinsky, E. (1984). A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Hoton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 275-282). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-....
 
18.
Dubinsky, E. (2004). Towards a theory of learning advanced mathematical concepts. In Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 121‑123). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020....
 
19.
Dubinsky, E. D. (1997). Some thoughts on a first course in linear algebra at the college level. Purdue University Press.
 
20.
Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton, M. Artigue, U. Kirchgräber, J. Hillel, M. Niss, & A. Schoenfield (Eds.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 275-282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-....
 
21.
Dubinsky, E., & Wilson, R. T. (2013). High school students’ understanding of the function concept. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(1), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
22.
Egan, K. (2008). Complex numbers. https://education.nsw.gov.au/t....
 
23.
Foster, C. (2014). “Can’t you just tell us the rule?” Teaching procedures relationally. In S. Pope (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th British Congress of Mathematics Education, 34(2), 151-158. University of Nottingham.
 
24.
Habre, S. (2017). Students’ challenges with polar functions: Covariational reasoning and plotting in the polar coordinate system. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(1), 48-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
25.
Hannah, J., Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2016). Developing conceptual understanding and definitional clarity in linear algebra through the three worlds of mathematical thinking. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 35(4), 216-235. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat....
 
26.
Hillel, J. (2000). Modes of description and the problem of representation in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 191-207). Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-....
 
27.
Kazunga, C., & Bansilal, S. (2017). Zimbabwean in-service mathematics teachers’ understanding of matrix operations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 47, 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
28.
Kazunga, C., & Bansilal, S. (2020). An APOS analysis of solving systems of equations using the inverse matrix method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103, 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
29.
Klapsinou, A., & Gray, E. (1999). The intricate balance between abstract and concrete in linear algebra. PME Conference, 3, 3-153.
 
30.
Lev, F. M. (2006). Why is quantum physics based on complex numbers? Finite Fields and Their Applications, 12(3), 336-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ffa.....
 
31.
Maharaj, A. (2010). An APOS analysis of students’ understanding of the concept of a limit of a function. Pythagoras, 71, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythag....
 
32.
Maharaj, A. (2015). A framework to gauge mathematical understanding: A case study on linear algebra concepts. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/097511....
 
33.
Moore, K. C., Paoletti, T., & Musgrave, S. (2014). Complexities in students’ construction of the polar coordinate system. The Journal of mathematical behavior, 36, 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
34.
Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Allen, E., Baszczewski, S., Swearingen, A., Wei, L., & Butler, A. M. (2018). Fostering high school students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through Quality Talk discussions. Science Education, 102(6), 1239-1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
 
35.
Mustafa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., & Mohamad Said, M. N. H. (2016). A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225-4228. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.20....
 
36.
Mutambara, L. H. N., & Bansilal, S. (2021). A case study of in-service teachers’ errors and misconceptions in linear combinations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
37.
Mynbaev, D. K., Bo, C. C., Rashvili, R. Y. K., & Liou-Mark, J. (2008). Support of study on engineering technology from physics and mathematics [Paper presentation]. The ASEE Mid-Atlantic Conference.
 
38.
Naidoo, K. (2007). First year students’ understanding of elementary concepts in differential calculus in a computer laboratory teaching environment. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 4(9), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v....
 
39.
Ndlovu, D., & Brijlall, D. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ mental constructions of concepts in matrix algebra. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/102884....
 
40.
Ndlovu, Z., & Brijlall, D. (2016). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ mental constructions of the determinant concept. International Journal of Educational Science, 14(2), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/097511....
 
41.
Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, T. K. (2020). STEM education in secondary schools: Teachers’ perspective towards sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(21), 8865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1221....
 
42.
Nordlander, M. C., & Nordlander, E. (2012). On the concept image of complex numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(5), 627‑641.
 
43.
Salgado, H., & Trigueros, M. (2015). Teaching eigenvalues and eigenvectors using models and APOS theory. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 39, 100-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
44.
Siyepu, S. W. (2013). Students’ interpretations in learning derivatives in a university mathematics classroom. In Z. Davis, & S. Jaffer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa (pp. 183‑193).
 
45.
Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2010). Student learning of basis, span and linear independence in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(2), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
46.
Stewart, S., Andrews-Larson, C., & Zandieh, M. (2019). Linear algebra teaching and learning: Themes from recent research and evolving research priorities. ZDM, 51(7), 1017-1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
47.
Tall, D. (2014). Making sense of mathematical reasoning and proof. In M. N. Fried, & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics & mathematics education: Searching for common ground (pp. 223-235). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
48.
Tan, S. H., & Toh, T. L. (2013). On the teaching of the representation of complex numbers in the Argand diagram. Learning Science and Mathematics, 8, 75-86.
 
49.
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-dePauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejste....
 
50.
Trigueros, M. (2019). The development of a linear algebra schema: Learning as result of the use of a cognitive theory and models. ZDM, 51(7), 1055-1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
51.
Wan, T., Emigh, P. J., & Shaffer, P. S. (2019). Probing student reasoning in relating relative phase and quantum phenomena. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020139. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRe....
 
52.
Wawro, M. (2014). Student reasoning about the invertible matrix theorem in linear algebra. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(3), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
53.
Weller, K., Clark, J., Dubinsky, E., Loch, S., McDonald, M., & Merkovsky, R. (2003) Student performance and attitudes in courses based on APOS Theory and the ACE Teaching Cycle. In A. Selden, E. Dubinsky, G. Harel, & F. Hitt (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education V (pp. 97-131). American Mathematical Society, Providence.
 
54.
Weyer, R. S. (2010). APOS theory as a conceptualisation for understanding mathematics learning. Summation, 9-15.
 
55.
Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). An overview of conceptual understanding in science education curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top