RESEARCH PAPER
Discourse analysis on understanding the differential concept of high school students in a dynamic geometry environment
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mathematics, University of Ulsan, SOUTH KOREA
 
2
Daegu Girls' High School, SOUTH KOREA
 
3
Department of Mathematics Education, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, SOUTH KOREA
 
 
Publication date: 2022-06-07
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(7):em2127
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study investigated the cognitive and social processes through which high school students acquire the differential concepts through communication in a dynamic geometry environment through some cases. Additionally, we observed how a dynamic geometry environment affects these processes. To achieve this objective, eight students were recruited by using the pre-test results and divided into an experimental group and a control group. The learning environment for the two groups was designed to be the same except for jointly manipulating Geogebra on the laptop in the experimental group. Students’ discourse was analyzed using an analysis framework that applied both Piaget’s (1959) linguistic categories and Rutherford’s (2011) neo-Piagetian model. We found that the dynamic geometry environment improved communication among students and their achievement levels. In particular, graphic and dynamic representations created by dragging stimulated students’ interest and increased communication among them. Although the quality of communication was somewhat different in the discourse analysis of the two groups, each participant’s role was confirmed in the co-construction of knowledge among all cases of eight students. We expect that precise verbal information on various representations of mathematical content in the process of understanding the concepts of students could be an opportunity to prepare educational environments corresponding thereto.
 
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Bormanaki, H. B., & Khoshhal, Y. (2017). The role of equilibration in Piaget’s theory of cognitive development and its implication for receptive skills: A theoretical study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 996-1005. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr. 0805.22.
 
2.
Devries, R. (1997). Piaget’s social theory. American Educational Research Association, 26(2), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
3.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
 
4.
Gucler, B. (2013). Examining the discourse on the limit concept in a beginning-level calculus classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
5.
Hollebrands, K. (2003). High school students’ understandings of geometry transformations in the context of a technological environment. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-....
 
6.
Hwang, H. J., & Kim, M. H. (2016). An experimental study on the understanding of the differential concept based on the historical-genetic process using a technological device. School Mathematics, 18(2), 277-300.
 
7.
Kang, H. I. (2012). Students’ reinvention of derivative concept through construction of tangent lines in the context of mathematical modeling. School Mathematics, 14(4), 409-429.
 
8.
Kim, D. J., Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Sfard, A. (2012). How does language impact the learning of mathematics? Comparison of English and Korean speaking university students’ discourses on infinity. International Journal of Educational Research, 51-52(0), 86-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer....
 
9.
Lee, S. G., Shin, J. K., & Kim, K. W. (2014). A case study of perceptions on storytelling mathematics textbooks with computer algebra system. Communications of Mathematical Education, 28(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee....
 
10.
Lewis, K. E. (2017). Designing a bridging discourse: Re-mediation of a mathematical learning disability. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(2), 320-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/105084....
 
11.
Mariotti, M. (2000). Introduction to proof: The mediation of a dynamic software environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1-2), 25-53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012....
 
12.
Mayer, S. J. (2005). The early evolution of Jean Piaget’s clinical method. History of Psychology, 8(4), 362-382. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4....
 
13.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 
14.
Oh, H. Y. (2018). A study on understanding of differentiation. Communications of Mathematical Education, 19(4), 639-661. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee....
 
15.
Park, E. J. (2017). Analysis of understanding of tangent and differential coefficients of high school students [Master’ thesis, Chonnam National University].
 
16.
Piaget, J. (1928). Judgment and reasoning in the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
 
17.
Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
 
18.
Robert, A., & Speer, N. (2001). Research on the teaching and learning of calculus/elementary analysis. In D. Holton (ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 283-299). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-....
 
19.
Rutherford, G. D. (2011). A model of assimilation and accommodation in the cognitive & cultural realms. Dynamical Psychology.
 
20.
Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 567-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/105084....
 
21.
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communication. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
 
22.
Sierpinska, A. (1987). Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(4), 371-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0024....
 
23.
Sierpinska, A. (1990). Some remarks on understanding in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(3), 24-36.
 
24.
Sinclair, N., & Moss, J. (2012). The more it changes, the more it becomes the same: The development of the routine of shape identification in dynamic geometry environment. International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer....
 
25.
Sinclair, N., & Yurita, V. (2008). To be or to become: How dynamic geometry changes discourse. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/147948....
 
26.
Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limit and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0030....
 
27.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber, & A. C. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (pp. 39-285). Plenum Press.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top