Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
Entrepreneurial Education: The Effect of Entrepreneurial Political Skill on Social Network, Tacit Knowledge, and Innovation Capability
1
Department of Business Administration, Social Enterprise Research Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, TAIWAN
Online publication date: 2017-08-11
Publication date: 2017-08-11
Corresponding author
Kai-Ping Huang
Department of Business Administration, Social Enterprise Research Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510 Zhongzheng Rd, Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City, 24205 Taiwan, R.O.C.
Department of Business Administration, Social Enterprise Research Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510 Zhongzheng Rd, Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City, 24205 Taiwan, R.O.C.
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(8):5061-5072
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to examine the role of political skills in entrepreneurship education and the impact of social network, tacit knowledge, and innovation constructs. This study sought to investigate the conceptual relationship between political skills and tacit knowledge, social network and tacit knowledge, as well as innovation and tacit knowledge. The existence of the three construct and their effect on entrepreneur skill has been reviewed and discussed. This has been corroborated across studies that sought to establish the role of social networks, tacit knowledge, and innovation in influencing entrepreneurship. The performance of enterprise has closely being linked on the ability of individuals to take advantage of the social network and the individual as well as collective tacit knowledge to understand the business environment and come up with practical skills to counter the potential entrepreneurship risks. This study also addresses the impact of tacit knowledge on innovation. Tacit knowledge has both negative and positive effects on innovation, emanating from the transferability of innovations across individuals and firms.
REFERENCES (44)
1.
Banister, C. M., & Meriac, J. P. (2015). Political Skill and Work Attitudes: A Comparison of Multiple Social Effectiveness Constructs. The Journal of Psychology, 149(8), 775-79.
2.
Baron, R. A., & Markman, G. D. (2003). Beyond social capital: The role of entrepreneurs’ social competence in their financial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 41-60.
3.
Blickle, G., Meurs, J. A., Zettler, I., Solga, J., Noethen, D., Kramer, J., & Ferris, G. R. (2008). Personality, political skill, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 377-387.
4.
Bolander, W., Satornino, C. B., Hughes, D. E., & Ferris, G. R. (2015). Social Networks within Sales Organizations: Their Development and Importance for Salesperson Performance. Journal of Marketing, 79(6), 1-16.
5.
Brouer, R. L., Badaway, R. L., Gallagher, V. C., & Haber, J. A. (2015). Political Skill Dimensionality and Impression Management Choice and Effective Use. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 217-233.
6.
Chuang, C., Jackson, S. E., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Can Knowledge-Intensive Teamwork Be Managed? Examining the Roles of HRM Systems, Leadership, and Tacit Knowledge. Journal of Management, 42(2), 524-554.
7.
Dietz, G. (2004). Partnership and the development of trust in British workplaces. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(1), 5-24.
8.
Elmuti, D., Khoury, G., & Omran, O. (2012). Does Entrepreneurship Education Have A Role in Developing Entrepreneurial Skills and Ventures’ Effectiveness? Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 15, 83-98.
9.
Fang, R., Chi, L, Chen, M., & Baron, R. A. (2015). Bringing Political Skill into Social Networks: Findings from a Field Study of Entrepreneurs. Journal of Management Studies, 52(2), 175-212.
10.
Ferris, G. R., Perrewé, P. L., & Douglas, C. (2002). Social Effectiveness in Organizations: Construct Validity and Research Directions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 49-63.
11.
Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., & Frink, D. D. (2005). Development and Validation of the Political Skill Inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126-152.
12.
Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., Zivnuska, S., & Shaw, J. D. (2007). The Impact of Political Skill on Impression Management Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 278-285.
13.
Holste, J. S., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of knowledge management, 14(1), 128-140.
14.
Jafari, M., Akhavan, P., & Nourizadeh, M. (2013). Classification of human resources based on measurement of tacit knowledge: An empirical study in Iran. Journal of Management Development, 32(4), 376-403.
15.
Johannessen, J. A., Olaisen, J., & Olsen, B. (2001). Mismanagement of tacit knowledge: the importance of tacit knowledge, the danger of information technology, and what to do about it. International Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 3-20.
16.
Johannessen, J., & Olsen, B. (2011). Aspects of a cybernetic theory of tacit knowledge and innovation. Kybernetes, 40(1/2), 141-165.
17.
Lans, T., Blok, V., & Gulikers, J. (2016). Show me your network and I’ll tell you who you are: social competence and social capital of early-stage entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(7/8), 458-473.
18.
Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132.
19.
Levy, D. A., Collins, B. E., & Nail, P. R. (1998). A new model of interpersonal influence characteristics. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(4), 715-733.
20.
Li, J., Sun, G., & Cheng, Z. (2017).The Influence of Political Skill on Salespersons’ Work Outcomes: A Resource Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 551-562.
21.
Lucas, L. (2005). The impact of trust and reputation on the transfer of best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 87-101.
22.
Meyer, D., & Dunphy, S. (2016). The role of knowledge-based psychological climates in human resource management systems. Management Decision, 54(5), 1222-1246.
23.
Michele Kacmar, K., & Tucker, R. (2016). The Moderating Effect of Supervisor’s Behavioral Integrity on the Relationship between Regulatory Focus and Impression Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 87-98.
24.
Ngah, R., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Tacit Knowledge Sharing and SMEs’ Organizational Performance. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 216-220.
25.
Nonaka, I., & Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635-652.
26.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
Park, C., Vertinsky, I., & Lee, C. (2012). Korean international joint ventures: how the exchange climate affects tacit knowledge transfer from foreign parents. International Marketing Review, 29(2), 151-174.
28.
Perez-Luno, A., Saparito, P., & Gopalakrishman, S. (2016). Small and medium-sized enterprise’s Entrepreneurial versus market orientation and the creation of tacit knowledge. Journal of small business management, 54(1), 262-278.
29.
Perraton, J., & Tarrant, I. (2007). What does tacit knowledge actually explain? Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(3), 353-370.
30.
Phipps, S. T. A., &, Prieto, L. C. (2015). Politicking and Entrepreneurship: Determining the Critical Political Skill Dimensions for High Entrepreneurial Intentions. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 21(2), 73-86.
32.
Rachwał, T., Kurek, S., & Boguś, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship Education at Secondary Level in Transition Economies: A Case of Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(1), 61-81.
33.
Ravetz, J. (1971). Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
Schenkel, A., & Teigland, R. (2008). Improved organizational performance through communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 106-118.
35.
Soo, C., Tian, A. W., Teo, S. T. T., & Cordery, J. (2017). Intellectual Capital-Enhancing HR, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation. Human Resource Management, 56(3), 431-454.
36.
Spulber, D. F. (2012). Tacit knowledge with innovative entrepreneurship. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30(6), 641–653.
37.
Tamzini, K., Ayed, T. L., & Boulanouar, A. W. (2016). How to Measure Tacit Knowledge?: The V.R.I.N Model’s Method. Knowledge Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 1-17.
38.
Tocher, N., Oswald, S. L., Shook, C. L., & Adams, G. (2012). Entrepreneur political skill and new venture performance: Extending the social competence perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(5-6), 283-305.
39.
Todd, S. Y., Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2009). Career success implications of political skill. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(3), 279-304.
40.
Tödtling, F., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Does Combinatorial Knowledge Lead to a Better Innovation Performance of Firms? European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1741-1758.
41.
Wang, H., Choi, J., Wan, G., & Dong, J. Q. (2016). Slack Resources and the Rent-Generating Potential of Firm-Specific Knowledge. Journal of Management, 42(2), 500-523.
42.
Wang, Z., Wang, N., Cao, J., & Ye, X. (2016). The impact of intellectual capital-knowledge management strategy fit on firm performance. Management Decision, 54(8), 1861-1885.
43.
Wihler, A., Blickle, G., Ellen, P. B., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2017). Personal Initiative and Job Performance Evaluations: Role of Political Skill in Opportunity Recognition and Capitalization. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1388-1420.
44.
Zhao, X., Frese, M., & Giardini, A. (2010). Business owners’ network size and business growth in China: The role of comprehensive social competency. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(7-8), 675-705.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
