Research trends on learning environment in science education
More details
Hide details
Department of Pedagogy of Higher Education, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, RUSSIA
Department of Hospitality, Tourism and Sports Industry, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
Department of Psychology and Pedagogical Anthropology, Moscow State Linguistic University, Moscow, RUSSIA
Department of Informatics, Management and Technology, Moscow City University, Moscow, RUSSIA
Department of Nervous Disease, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RUSSIA
Online publication date: 2023-09-13
Publication date: 2023-11-01
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(11):em2351
The bibliometric approach examines the science education learning environment by analyzing annual counts, keywords, most cited authors, institutions, funding agencies, and leading journals. 133 articles were indexed in Scopus Database through the use of learning environment and science education keywords from 1989 to 2022. By analyzing the quality and quantity of changes. The focus of the study was to discover patterns in the learning environment of science education publications in Scopus Database. The most commonly used keywords are science education, learning environment(s) and computer science education from the bibliometric analysis. Released in 2021, the study showed that the learning environment in science education was introduced in 1989. A trend of fluctuating distribution regarding articles has been observed. Proposals for future research on the learning environment in science education are made by this study, which takes a global approach.
Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hwang, J. (2010). Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: Two indices, the RC-index, and the CC-index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities. Scientometrics, 83(1), 1-13.
Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2021). Scientific production and thematic breakthroughs in smart learning environments: A bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1-25.
Ahmi, A. (2021). Bibliometric analysis for beginners: A starter guide to begin with a bibliometric study using Scopus Dataset and tools such as Microsoft Excel, Harzing’s Publish or Perish and VOSviewer software. Google Books.
Andersen, P. A., Goodwin, M., & Granmo, O. C. (2018). The dreaming variational autoencoder for reinforcement learning environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 143-155). Springer.
Archer-Kuhn, B., Wiedeman, D., & Chalifoux, J. (2020). Student engagement and deep learning in higher education: Reflections on inquiry-based learning on our group study program course in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 24(2), 107-122.
Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, S., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647.
Ashton, C. (2001). Life skills project implementation in the American education system. UNICEF.
Aslam, S., Saleem, A., Hali, A. U., & Akram, H. (2020). Science students’ perceptions of the learning environment in Science degree programs. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 13(38), 4003-4012.
Ball, R. (2017). An introduction to bibliometrics: New development and trends. Chandos Publishing.
Bornmann, L., Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1507-1513.
Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719-726.
Cavanagh, R. F., & Fisher, W. P. (2018, August). The science in human science research: The case for Rasch measurement in learning environment research. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1065, No. 7, p. 072010). IOP Publishing.
Cetin-Dindar, A. (2015). Student motivation in constructivist learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 233-247.
Chen, Y. C., Lu, Y. L., & Lien, C. J. (2021). Learning environments with different levels of technological engagement: a comparison of game-based, video-based, and traditional instruction on students’ learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(8), 1363-1379.
Dhanapala, R. M., & Premaratne, C. D. H. M. (2021). Perceived satisfaction on learning environment of science-based and non-science based ESL learners of peripheral universities of Sri Lanka. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 11(3), 282.
Green, J. H., Passarelli, R. E., Smith‐Millman, M. K., Wagers, K., Kalomiris, A. E., & Scott, M. N. (2019). A study of an adapted social-emotional learning: Small group curriculum in a school setting. Psychology in the Schools, 56(1), 109-125.
Ioseliani, A. D., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Svintsova, M. N., Panov, E. G., Skvortsova, E. M., & Bayanova, A. R. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of articles on digital educational environments. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep426.
Jones, W. M., & Dexter, S. (2014). How teachers learn: The roles of formal, informal, and independent learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(3), 367-384.
Kalyon, D. Ş. (2020). The science learning environment primary school students’ imagine. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(4), 605-627.
Kampinga, E., O’Connor, C., Goedhart, M., & Ryan, B. (2021). The effect of a change in virtual learning environment on innovative digital teaching practice: A case study of academic staff in an Irish university. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 101-127.
Kervinen, A., Roth, W. M., Juuti, K., & Uitto, A. (2020). The resurgence of everyday experiences in school science learning activities. Cultural studies of science education, 15, 1019-1045.
Khobotova, E. B., Ihnatenko, M. I., Hraivoronska, I. V., & Kaliuzhna, I. S. (2022). A competency-based approach to environmental education: learning about “radioecology”. Education and Self Development, 17(1), 10-27.
Kilei, J. K. (2012). Factors influencing quality training in public primary TTC in Rift Valley Zone, Kenya. Executive Med project, Moi University.
Kim, H. H. S., & Chun, J. (2020). Bullying victimization, school environment, and suicide ideation and plan: Focusing on youth in low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(1), 115-122.
Knight, S. B., Owens, E. W., & Waxman, H. C. (1991). Comparing the classroom learning environments of traditionally and alternatively certified teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 12(4), 29-34.
Knight, S. L., & Waxman, H. C. (1991). Students’ cognition and classroom instruction. In Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 239-255).
Kocak, M., & Soylu, Y. (2022). Examining the general structure of learning environments designed in education: Bibliometric analysis between 1970 and 2022. Learning Environments Research.
Kolb, D. A., & Kolb, A. Y. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.
Newman, M. E., Barabasi, A. L., & Watts, D. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404-409.
Niyazova, A. A., & Khuziakhmetov, A. N. (2021). Continuous social and environmental education of the future teacher in the interests of sustainable development of society. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania [Perspectives Sciences and Education], 52(4), 147-159.
Patel, P., Torppa, M., Aro, M., Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2018). GraphoLearn India: The effectiveness of a computer-assisted reading intervention in supporting struggling readers of English. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1045.
Pramathevan, G. S., & Fraser, B. J. (2020). Learning environments associated with technology-based science classrooms for gifted Singaporean females. Learning Environments Research, 23(2), 195-215.
Seref, I., & Karagoz, B. (2020). Citation analysis of graduate theses on teaching of Turkish as a foreign language (1988-2019). Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 49(2), 1145-1183.
Shudayfat, E. A., & Alsalhi, N. R. I. (2023). Science learning in 3D virtual environment multi-users online in basic education stage. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2216.
Singer, A., Montgomery, G., & Schmoll, S. (2020). How to foster the formation of STEM identity: Studying diversity in an authentic learning environment. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-12.
Smith, S. M. (2011). Creating safe learning environments for at-risk students in urban schools. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(4), 123-126.
Smolyaninova, O. G., Gruzdeva, E. A., & Smolyaninov, A. A. (2021). Online mediation in the socialization of children with disabilities: Environmental conditions in the arctic and the north of the Krasnoyarsk territory. Education and Self Development, 16(3), 346-361.
Softa, V. (2011). Learning environment effect and use of technology in the study of English language. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 35, 127.
Supriadi, U., Supriyadi, T., Abdussalam, A., & Rahman, A. A. (2022). A decade of value education model: a bibliometric study of Scopus Database in 2011-2020. European Journal of Educational Research, 11, 557-571.
Tang, K. Y., Wang, C. Y., Chang, H. Y., Chen, S., Lo, H. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The intellectual structure of metacognitive scaffolding in science education: A co-citation network analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 249-262.
Thomas, G. P., & Chantharanuwong, W. (2022). Factor structure and dimensionality of an instrument designed to measure the metacognitive orientation of Thai science classroom learning Environments. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 805-818.
Turkmen, H. (2022). The effect of emotional status on children’s learning in an informal environment: Case of Sasali Wildlife Park. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 2(2), 43-50.
Umar, A. A. (2017). The effect of classroom environment on achievement in English as a foreign language (EFL): A case study of secondary school students in Gezira State: Sudan. World Journal of English Language, 7(4), 1-10.
Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 381-419.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249-294.