RESEARCH PAPER
Implementation of E-Learning in New Taipei City During COVID-19
 
More details
Hide details
1
Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, TAIWAN
 
2
Department of Machine Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, TAIWAN
 
 
Publication date: 2022-03-09
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(4):em2092
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic, educational institutions around the world have closed, affecting more than 60% of students and causing massive disruption to the education system. Taiwan is no exception. For this sudden and dramatic change, teachers, students, and parents all confront significant challenges. In order to make specific suggestions for improvement, the study aims to explore the current state of e-learning in Taiwan and to understand the difficulties faced by teachers, parents, and students. The study conducted in-depth interviews with 20 teachers, 12 parents, and 24 students. The research results show that in New Taipei City, there are barely any online courses for grades 1 and 2, blended learning is mainly for grades 3 and 4, and synchronous e-learning is designed for grades 5 and 6. The main challenges in adopting e-learning in primary schools include, as follows: (i) Teachers, parents, and students are unfamiliar with the user interface of the e-learning platform. (ii) Insufficient hardware and software equipment at home. (iii) Teachers cannot take care of special students. (iv) Communication between teachers and parents is not smooth. (v) Difficulty in assessing learning progress online. (vi) Students are easily distracted from their studies. Based on the above research results, the researchers put forward specific suggestions for future online teaching practices.
 
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Abbasi, S., Ayoob, T., Malik, A., & Memon, S. I. (2020). Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during COVID-19 at a private medical college. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S57-S61. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.....
 
2.
Aboagye, E., Yawson, J. A., & Appiah, K. N. (2021). COVID-19 and e-learning: The challenges of students in tertiary institutions. Social Education Research, 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.2....
 
3.
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/104948....
 
4.
Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijed....
 
5.
Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29-42.
 
6.
Bencheva, N. (2010). Learning styles and e-learning face-to-face to the traditional learning. Nauchni Trudove Na Rusenskiya Universitet [Scientific Papers of the University of Ruse], 49(3.2), 63-67.
 
7.
Boon, M. (2006). How science is applied in technology. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 20(01), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/026985....
 
8.
Chung, W. M., & Chang, C. Y. (2014, May). A study of using mobiles in a climate change course [Paper presentation]. The 18th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education, Shanghai, China.
 
9.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajt....
 
10.
Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
 
11.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
 
12.
Maryanti, R., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Hufad, A., & Sunardi, S. (2021). Science education for students with special needs in Indonesia: From definition, systematic review, education system, to curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijcsn....
 
13.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
 
14.
Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. SAGE.
 
15.
Permanasari, A. (2016). STEM education: Inovasi dalam pembelajaran sains [STEM education: Innovation in science learning]. In Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains) [Proceedings of SNPS (National Seminar on Science Education)] (pp. 23-34).
 
16.
Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06....
 
17.
Seok, S. (2008). Teaching aspects of e-learning. International Journal on E-learning, 7(4), 725-741.
 
18.
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-....
 
19.
Woods, R. H. Jr. (2002). How much communication is enough in online courses? Exploring the relationship between frequency of instructor-initiated personal email and learners’ perceptions of and participation in online learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 377-394.
 
20.
Zahrawati, F., & Nurhayati, N. (2021). The challenge of online learning in curriculum-2013 during COVID-19 pandemic: Study of social science teachers at MAN 2 prepare. Sociological Education, 2(1), 9-14.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top